Not exact matches
We're are saying that He didn't see things through the lens of
political or economic
labels.
Of course, another possibility is that antiabortion people are
not really interested in developing a «pro-life» philosophy but rather are just using the «pro-life»
label because it will enhance their
political effectiveness.
When the constitution of 1917 was drafted, therefore, «Catholic» representation was nonexistent, and the resulting document
not only repeated earlier material restrictions on the Church (such as government ownership of all church property, civil registry of priests, and making marriage a civil matter) but also got in a symbolic lick or two (for example, religious garb was
not to be worn in public; worship was to be only an indoor affair; alien priests were forbidden; and no religious
labels were allowed for
political parties).
We don't like
labels to begin with, and evangelicalism already carries a lot of
political and theological baggage.
But trying to
label conservative
political speech has hate and then trying to illegalize hate speech won't solve the real problem.
It can
not be
labeled national in the sense that it stems from one state or
political institution, for only for the comparatively short period of the reigns of David and Solomon was the people of Israel contained within one kingdom.
I believe some will argue the alliance is just a mere opportunistic move to gain ground with a
political party thats so desperate to absorb a black candidate to counter the
labels they have earned as a party that does
not subscribe to Blacks interest.
Further, it's gotten to the point where any comment made in support of an argument made by the right is
labeled racist, etc., as if someone in a
political position one doesn't share can never be right about anything (a problem shared by both those on the left and right).
However, that it avoids
labelling itself as
political does
not neutralise the
political nature of its actions.
You don't get to become one of them unless they as a class approve of you - which typically strongly transcends
political labels.
In a presidential cycle that has featured nothing but big upsets, almost daily controversies, and a willingness by much of the American public to forgive and forget that which was once
labeled as «out of bounds,» it would
not be surprising to see the pendulum of
political polls swing once more.
It has been used
not only to identify a wide range of anti-established and anti-neoliberalism movements, but also as an evergreen «offensive tool» of
labelling every type of
political opponent.
«Minor parties in New York have oftentimes
not been what their
labels suggest,» said Michael Haselswerdt, a Canisius College
political science professor.
The fact that the state doesn't want any
political party to call itself «Independent Party» has nothing to do with ballot
labels for independent candidates.
My assumption was that anybody who is
not registered on behalf of a recognised
political party would be
labelled as Independent.
«Fear of being
labelled «racist» has paralysed the entire
political class — leaving the way clear for Labour ideologues to use mass immigration to remake British identity, all but collapsing public services under the weight of numbers and driving down wages to undercut British workers... whereas Labour concealed what it was doing to dupe its core vote, the Tories have concealed what they are
not doing in order to dupe their core vote» — Melanie Phillips, Daily Mail
Political rivals and commentators have
labeled the comments «offensive», while others have questioned whether the comparison is historically valid or
not.
Most people almost certainly use
political labels wrong as they simply don't have the reflex of opening a dictionary and encyclopedia.
At times, it was difficult to ignore the
political upheavals on campus — as a black person, if you did
not take part in
political protests, you were often intimidated and
labelled a sellout.
She brings a new twist to the issue of the gap between American minority low - income children and middle - class children; what has engaged her passions and formidable abilities is
not the academic gap, though of course she is fully aware of it, but the gap in the ability to participate effectively in the civic life, to influence
political choices, the «Civic Empowerment» gap, as she
labels it.
The artist was
not very fond of this
label, so the following year at Documenta 11 he showed a simple still - life executed on a massive scale regardless of social and
political upheavals of the time.
The impact of objects in these terms is
not only sociological, but economical,
political, existential, psychological, epistemological: it is total — beyond a
label which is meant to mark a certain, already passed, historical - cultural moment.
Here's what I do
nt» get: There seems to be no shortage of loud
political commentary from contrarians, as seen on various op - ed pages, yet when a scientist from the consensus community makes any suggestion of reducing emissions, an obvious implication from what the science says, it's a big deal and they are
labelled as activists or ideologues.
If people then run into legitimate criticism of uncertainty and climate policy by well respected skeptics (e.g.: Lindzen), then there is the danger that they will
label your site as
political and
not scientific, and you could lose credibility in the eyes of some people.
«No -
labels» is a common weasel word structure for
not revealing your true cultural and
political I.D..
From watching the stoner's bizarre videos it seems that he isn't a Palinite by any stretch, or coherent enough for any sort of
political label to apply (let alone «left - Liberal», seriously Jack).
Of course, due to the evolving
political climate, the three Senators will probably
not call their system «cap - and - trade,» but will give it some other creative
label.
Of course, it's a dynamic and you aren't responsible if others choose intransigence; but perhaps there might be something more effective than calling people «warmists» and turning a blind eye to
labeling like «groveling, terrified coward,» and putting up obviously
political and partisan guest posts w / o editorial comment.
However, that strategy only goes so far, as nutritional
labels don't tell us much of anything about the company that makes the product, or the corporation that owns that company, or how they do business, or which
political party and campaign they support with donations.
Labels don't make the person anymore when concerning
political party than sides in the climate debate.
After a
political scientist unjustifiably
labeled his mainstream views «zombie science,» the President's Science Advisor, Dr. John P. Holdren, explained in an extended debunking how climate change worsens Western droughts even if it doesn't reduce precipitation (see here and below).
I won't discuss proposed metrics or
label protocols, as they don't yet exist; but, I will outline the US
political context as affects prospective acceptance.People will make unconscious comparisons.
Professor St. Lewis is at least as deserving of protection and legal remedy for defamation as any other individual under Canadian law — unless we accept the core of the defendant's argument that defamation somehow magically is
not defamation if you racialize your false reputational attack and
label it «racial
political analysis».
But because of the blurred line between law, policy and morality, the centrality of judicial independence, and the unique ability of judges to speak to certain moral and
political issues, we must
not label every obiter comment by a judge as misconduct.
«We realise we won't catch every ad that should be
labeled, and we encourage anyone who sees an unlabeled
political ad to report it.
The truth is that any analysis can be contorted, and while Wilson is
not as
political in his analysis as some may wish, particularly in the current anti- welfare climate, he is
not an apologist for those who lay the blame for the status of blacks living in poverty at the feet of what they
label as indolent welfare mothers.