Not exact matches
Her account appeared in the daily Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, the stern upholder of German financial orthodoxy and
not a publication usually given to accounts of workplace abuse by large and
powerful corporations.
But that's
not how it's being wielded in Silicon Valley — instead, massive companies are arguing that they should still largely be free of oversight, even as they've become some the most
powerful corporations in the world.
With such a
powerful corporation behind this, led by a person who wants to see cryptocurrency adoption, I don't think it will be too long before we see more positive movements come from the Comcast camp.
I maintain that all kinds of violence are the same the violence of the soldier who kills, the revolutionary who assassinates; it is true also of economic violence — the violence of the privileged proprietor against his workers, of the «haves» against the «have -
nots»; the violence done in international economic relations between our societies and those of the third world; the violence done through
powerful corporations, which exploit the resources of a country that is unable to defend itself [Violence (Seabury, 1969), p. 97].
And this is true
not only of physical violence — the violence of the soldier who kills, the policeman who bludgeons, the rebel who commits arson, the revolutionary who assassinates; it is true also of economic violence — the violence of the privileged proprietor against his workers, of the «haves» against the «have -
nots»; the violence done in international economic relations between our own societies and those of the Third World; the violence done through
powerful corporations which exploit the resources of a country that is unable to defend itself.
I have been strongly opposed to this from the beginning, but as long as it was economically profitable, and those who suffered were
not politically
powerful, it was extended by the World Trade Organization and other international economic organizations working together with huge agricultural
corporations and the American government.
The penalty imposed on NYK should send a
powerful message to multinational
corporations that conduct business in Australia that anti-competitive conduct will
not be tolerated and will be dealt with harshly».
Corporations such as Nestlé and Danone (the biggest and second biggest baby food companies) are becoming ever more economically and politically
powerful and governments are
not keeping up.
Corporations are becoming ever more economically and politically
powerful and governments are
not keeping up.
Not taking care of
powerful corporations that can make your life miserable.
«Campaign finance laws protect the integrity and fairness of elections and help ensure that everyone —
not just the wealthy or
powerful corporations — are represented in our system of government.
The
powerful corporations which constitute the right wing press, News International, the Barclay brothers and Rothermere are
not so much the third estate as a state within a state.
I am strong supporter of public education, a democracy responsive to our voices, and an economy grounded in good jobs and many small businesses,
not a few
powerful corporations.»
People who have dealt with the Home Office for a couple of years eventually come to the conclusion that it is the most corrupt government department of all Whitehall departments, as they do
not look after the people of this nation, but
powerful corporations and people who make billions every year through suppression.
With his
nest of white hair and vibrant blue eyes, he seems more like an amiable country doctor than a Harvard - trained physician who has fought the world's most
powerful corporations and bullied bureaucrats to protect the public from poisonous pollutants for nearly 30 years.
He isn't afraid to stray beyond the familiar narrative of the heroic everyman taking on
powerful corporations; the already tragic film reaches peak despair while documenting the activists» ugly infighting.
Copyright can't enrich the dead, but it can enrich
powerful corporations... at our — at everyone's — expense.
They are mainly concerned about how they can keep their credit or how this is going to affect their day - to - day expenses,
not a legal principle, and in most cases have neither the means, the patience, the principle, or the money to pursue an issue against a
powerful corporation that is probably basically tangential to the real concerns of their life.
This adoption by contracted producers is
not unexpected, since a handful of
powerful pharmaceutical and agrichemical multinational
corporations like Bayer and Monsanto, have gained a monopolistic control over the major commodity crop seed stocks, making available to farmers only their highly promoted, patented varieties of GE seeds.
Private Military
Corporations do the bidding of countries who don't have armies
powerful enough.
Rich industrialized countries are
not homogenous societies, within those countries there are elites, the one percent, and the
powerful corporations, the oil and auto industries, among others.
We now know that for a decade the Howard Government's policies have been
not so much influenced but actually written by a tiny cabal of
powerful fossil fuel lobbyists representing the very
corporations whose commercial interests would be affected by any move to reduce Australia's burgeoning greenhouse gas emissions.
it looks like what we are really arguing about is
not the sustaining or abandonment of modern civilization, but the persistence of the business model of a few
powerful corporations and their numerous satellite industries.
In the context of Shell arguing (h / t Dan O.) that there's no escape without CCS, it looks like what we are really arguing about is
not the sustaining or abandonment of modern civilization, but the persistence of the business model of a few
powerful corporations and their numerous satellite industries.
Very nearly every other developed nation in the world mandates the labeling of genetically modified ingredients, but
not the United States, that nation wholly in the hands of
corporations, to the point that states fear them as being more
powerful.
This fight, to move away from fossil fuels as rapidly as possible, to push fossil fuel companies to either change their polluting ways or eliminate them entirely if they won't, to curtail the deeply damaging influence these
powerful corporations, beholden to nothing but their profits, is the fight of our times.
We have achieved success for our clients against some of the most
powerful opponents in the world,
not just individuals, but also government entities and multinational
corporations.
I wasn't clear: My reference to
corporations was informed by my personal observation that large,
powerful law firms (animated by large,
powerful corporate clients) are the engines that drive most significant changes in the profession — because of the influence those same firms have within provincial Law Societies and the judiciary.
We have won victories for our clients against some of the most
powerful opponents in the world,
not just individuals, but also
corporations and government entities.
It has
not been used to protect the rights of citizens against
powerful corporations intent on suppressing civil and political rights.
The fact that a Canadian court could
not see the necessity of the strict application of Charter protections is a commentary on the status of protest rights in Canada when they come into conflict with
powerful corporations.
For lawyers who have their own
corporation they have some
powerful tools that will afford them things average Canadians can
not do.
We are
not afraid to stand up against large
corporations and
powerful opponents.
We do
not hesitate to try your case in court, going toe - to - toe against big insurance companies and
powerful corporations that put their profit before your safety.
But even if you're
not running a startup or sitting in the C - suite at a multinational
corporation, Team of Teams will be a
powerful read for you.