Sentences with phrase «not practicing scientists»

They are not practicing scientists and they don't appear to understand the underlying science.

Not exact matches

As Stulberg tells Science of Us, behavior scientist K. Anders Ericsson discovered in the 1990's that what separates great performers — musicians, artists, chess players, even physicians — from everyone else was not that they practiced more than their peers.

Atheists: I know many there are many people that practice religion just by fanaticism, I've seen many people in my opinion stupid (excuse the word) praying to saints hopping to solve their problems by repeating pre-made sentences over and over, but there are others different, I don't think Religion and Science need to be opposites, I believe in God, I'm Catholic and I have many reasons to believe in him, I don't think however that we should pray instead of looking for the cause and applying a solution, Atheists think they are smart because they focus on Science and technology instead of putting their faith in a God, I don't think God will solve our problems, i think he gave us the means to solve them by ourselves that's were God is, also I think that God created everything but not as a Magical thing but stablishing certain rules like Physics and Quimics etc. he's not an idiot and he knew how to make it so everything was on balance, he's the Scientist of Scientist the Mathematic of Mathematics, the Physician of Physicians, from the tiny little fact that a mosquito, an insect species needs to feed from blood from a completely different species, who created the mosquitos that way?

Even when I was a believing and practicing Christian, I realized that regardless of their beliefs, doctors still saved lives, made discoveries, scientists still learned more about the world we live in... the idea that all knowledge has to be attached to the «creator» or it is somehow tainted or suspect, just doesn't pan out when you look at it logically.

My own view of all of this, as a practicing social scientist interested in the relationship between religious faith and empirical science, is that the general perspective taken by Evans - Pritchard, Douglas, and the Turners is not only entirely reasonable but close to the best account we might give.

In this light, it is not the case that we would abandon a moral, religious, aesthetic or political life for a life of doing logic, but rather, we would not leave the moral life to the ethicists, the religious life to the theologians and customary religious practices, and the political life to the politicians and political scientists, just as we surely would not leave propositions in the hands of the logicians.4

At least the doctrine and practice of AE / Dalahast's nasty religion has shifted enough that they are no longer torturing and threatening scientists who expose the Christian god fraud, or at least not as much as in years past.

The confident belief that many practicing scientists have in the reality of electrons (which are not visible) seems inappropriate if evidentialism is true.

From Genesis to Leviticus, to II Kings, to Matthew, to Romans, to Jude, you don't have to be a rocket scientist to understand that GLBTQ coitus and marriage are not permitted as Christian practice.

Again, while I am not a scientist or medical doctor, I don't necessarily agree, especially if the amount of what Bob Cantu calls «total brain trauma» can be significantly reduced through a combination of limits on full - contact practices and / or hit counts, rule changes, and if we do a better job of identifying concussive injury to get concussed players off the field (or ice, or field, or court, or pitch), and and hold kids out longer before they are allowed to return to play so the risk of reinjury is reduced as much as reasonably possible.

Thus far, the reading that I have done on the microbiome is fascinating and I can't wait for the field to mature as scientists learn more, but there is insufficient evidence to make large - scale changes to current clinical practices.

Placenta trees haven't caught on the way placenta pills have, but according to Dr. Stacy Zamudio, a senior scientist and Hackensack Universal Medical Center's Director of Research, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, burial of the placenta is actually «the most common practice» and «goes back to medieval times.»

In practice, of course, it doesn't always work that way, and some scientists are taking it upon themselves to go beyond their core research areas to study where the system can go wrong.

Anderson thinks these deceptive practices may stem from scientists» perceptions that they are not being treated fairly when it comes to receiving grants or getting proper credit.

Scientists call this «traumatic insemination,» and though practiced with apparent evolutionary success by several species of invertebrates, it's not at all a positive experience for the female: the wound made by the male's wedge is liable to get infected.

Yet the current postdoctoral arrangements seem to be discouraging talented graduates from becoming academic scientists and may not be fostering best practices in the scientific endeavor.

But NIH may be forced to regulate the practice from above, taking steps to assure that young biomedical scientists — and the NIH contract compliance staff — are not burdened with the stresses such practices create.

«Registered Reports not only reduce or eliminate bias, they also eliminate the need for biased practices in the first place,» Chambers says — although it remains to be demonstrated whether the new publishing model will actually succeed in achieving this aim and addressing all of scientists» concerns.

Our hope is that scientists will change their practice because they are compelled by the argument that they are ethically obliged to, not because they are forced to share data.»

Sadly, though, he and the other candidates might actually understand P values just about as well as many practicing scientists — which is to say, not very well at all.

In fact, there's a huge group of scientists who might not spot the difference between a real conference and a fake one; who might think it's a good idea to attend conferences they don't recognize, run by societies they haven't heard of; and who might think that paying to give a speech or to receive an award is standard practice.

«People should have a reasonable expectation of being able to practice their science if they're encouraged to become scientists,» says labor economist Michael Teitelbaum of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation «It shouldn't be a guarantee, but they ought to have a reasonable prospect.»

But in practice, not one company or NIH - funded scientist has ever been penalized.

Organizers have emphasized that the march is not just for practicing scientists, but for «anyone who believes in empirical science.»

Van Driel said that the legislation would make it «impossible for many, if not most, natural scientists [physicists, chemists, biologists, computer scientists, etc.] to practice their professions in industry, government, and universities» without the oversight of an engineer «who might know little or nothing about the specialty.»

According to a scientist who knew the particulars of this use of ZMapp but asked not to be identified, the antibodies weren't produced under good manufacturing practices, a set of standards to guarantee quality and safety of medical products.

The study's results suggest that long - term couples need not change their sexual practices, say the scientists.

If pumping practices are not modified, scientists warn that these habitats will continue to shrink, and the fish populations along with them.

Over the last decade, political scientists have debated whether or not human rights practices have been stagnating, as the uncorrected data seem to indicate.

We have often mentioned in this space that many nonacademic employers complain that early - career scientists don't understand business culture and such practices as budgeting and project management.

First, it is helpful to focus clinical practice sharply; not only to a subspecialty, but on an even narrower niche where one is the expert in only certain diseases within that subspecialty; by narrowing the scope, clinician - scientists find it easier stay on top of the rapid advances in both clinical and research fields.

As a Ph.D. - only scientist you won't be allowed to practice clinical medicine.

Today, an open letter from seven researchers whose emails featured in the stolen «climate-gate» documents that were posted online in 2009 and 2011 say that «although we can agree that stealing documents and posting them online is not an acceptable practice, we would be remiss if we did not point out that the Heartland Institute has had no qualms about utilizing and distorting emails stolen from scientists».

And being a staff scientist these days is quite an appealing way to practice science,» because you can concentrate on doing the work, and not get tangled up in the sometimes noxious process of fighting for funding.

So although we can agree that stealing documents and posting them online is not an acceptable practice, we would be remiss if we did not point out that the Heartland Institute has had no qualms about utilizing and distorting emails stolen from scientists.

Parsley Health isn't your ordinary medical practice, and our data scientist, Hants Williams isn't your average data scientist.

Students will be engaged as they not only take the role of many scientists, but indirectly practice the As you transverse the knowledge and experience of these revolutionary scientists, students will travel to (4) different stations using this highly engaging activity.

In addition to other factors that may play a role in a teacher's success — such as a teacher's enjoyment of teaching and motivation and inspiration to teach10 — developing expertise in any field requires intense, sustained, and deliberate practice designed specifically to maximize improvement.11 This is true for professionals as diverse as elite athletes, surgeons, 12 musicians, chess players, computer programmers, and scientists.13 Why wouldn't the same hold true for teachers?

I don't think it's because he doesn't practice what he preaches — he's a social media scientist, not a book marketer.

These are the kids that could have been scientists and doctors one day and improved all our lives when we are old, but because of the predatory practices of for - profit schools like Westwood and student loan lenders, they will not.

«Many practicing veterinarians may wish to become veterinary scientists but can't continue their educational journey due to financial constraints, such as high student debt,» said David Haworth, DVM, PhD, director, global alliances for Pfizer Animal Health.

The «scientist» basically looked on the internet for photos of dogs being hugged, and came to the conclusion, based on their expressions of stress, that they didn't like the practice.

[Response: I am a scientist, not a philosopher, and anything I am talking about here comes directly from the practice of science, not theorising about it.

Writing to Anthony Watts so he can get «your word» out to generally support a «belief» that the scientists have it all wrong is not science, it's practicing politics.

The scientists say in the review article that change is urgent not only to protect the environment in Appalachia, but around the world, because poor countries are poised to replicate the practices established in the United States.

And, Radge, I don't deny the realities of global warming, I don't assume that scientists (as a body) don't practice what they preach, nor do I intend to imply that they are hypocrites.

I do not buy the assumption that scientists don't practice what they preach or the implication that they are somehow hypocrites or that it even matters.

The next stages are easy to predict as well — the issues of «process» will be lost in the noise, the fake overreaction will dominate the wider conversation and become an alternative fact to be regurgitated in twitter threads and blog comments for years, the originators of the issue may or may not walk back the many mis - statements they and others made but will lose credibility in any case, mainstream scientists will just see it as hyper - partisan noise and ignore it, no papers will be redacted, no science will change, and the actual point (one presumes) of the «process» complaint (to encourage better archiving practices) gets set back because it's associated with such obvious nonsense.

The evidence, evidence that it has not happened in the case of physical climatology, is the unanimous support of (practically if not literally) all the various scientific professional groups, national honorary societies, and international panels... which constitutes «the great bulk of the scientific community»... which in turn speaks for «almost all scientists worldwide» in practice.

In Darriulat's opinion, when scientists write IPCC summaries not only are they are engaging in «a highly subjective exercise,» they're blatantly «ignoring basic scientific practices.»