Sentences with phrase «not preface»

We did not preface our survey with information related to the recent lawsuit.

You did not preface your original comment as someone who has been through what Zeeshan is experiencing.

So don't preface your career chronology with something like «Value Offered.»

Not exact matches

Mongeon prefaced his valuations, saying that they weren't scientific and that he relied on franchise sales and other metrics to put together his findings.

«As Robert Shiller's new 2009 preface to his prescient classic on behavioral economics and market volatility asserts, the irrational exuberance of the stock and housing markets «has been ended by an economic crisis of a magnitude not seen since the Great Depression of the 1930s.

In the preface to Several Short Sentences About Writing, he argues that «most of the received wisdom about how writing works is not only wrong but harmful,» and then devotes the rest of the book to smashing assumptions and correcting misconceptions about the craft.

Let me preface these reflections by saying that I am not casting criticisms towards other central banks or their policies.

HotAirAce «An honest believer would preface their claims with something like «Despite not having a shred of independent, factual, objective or verifiable evidence, I believe...»

In the preface to the German translation of Revelation that he composed in 1522, he said that he did not consider the book prophetic or apostolic, since «Christ is neither taught nor known in it.»

An honest believer would preface their claims with something like «Despite not having a shred of independent, factual, objective or verifiable evidence, I believe...» Why are you a dishonest member of the dead jew zombie vampire cannibal death cult aka christian?

I offer the above deposition as preface to confessing my dismay» I can not say despair because despair is a sin» over the state of Lutheranism in America today.

For Mark's Gospel, the connection occurs almost immediately, as Jesus's statement that some «will not taste death until they see the kingdom of God after it has come with power» prefaces the event of the transfiguration (Mark 9:1 — 2).

I am not sure what is more depressing / amusing: That the editor felt it necessary to add this platitudinous preface; Or that we live in a world where such nonsense now passes for a coherent comment.

When you used the word «must» as opposed to asking a question or stating something prefaced with... «in my opinion»... you, by using «must» are claiming something that you do not absolutely know as a fact, but is * opinion.

Let me preface this by saying I'm agnostic, don't believe in god, but anything is possible.

As he tells us in his prefaces, the discourses were to serve as a medium by which the reader is to come to an understanding of his own life, to an understanding of whether or not he lives authentically.

Prudentius is, first and last, a believer: «With voice at least let my soul honor God, if with good deeds she can not,» he declares in his own preface.

Someone will share a blog post or mention a book in a group or on social media, and they'll preface it with the same warning, «Now I don't with everything this person says, but I liked this...»

The story of the raising of Lazarus is prefaced by a statement of its purpose: it is not only for the glory of God but «that the Son of God may be glorified by means of it» (V. 4).

Glenn, you are an example of why Sunday School lessons should be prefaced with a disclaimer and let the innocent young children know that this is just a story illustrating the glory of God and that it is not literally true.

McAuley was so disliked in the Kremlin, for instance, that a Soviet anthology of Australian poetry carried a preface announcing: «We deliberately decided not to include his poems.»

Permit me to preface my remarks by saying that I do not wish to take a position on the thorny doctrinal question whether we know that some (unknown) persons will be damned, although I take it for granted» as do von Balthasar and Neuhaus» that Catholic theology does not hold or teach that we know all will be saved, a proposition it is unlikely even the optimistic Origen affirmed with certainty, and is surely difficult to square with Jesus» repeated teaching on the «two ways» (e.g., Matthew 7:13 «14), especially his answer to the question whether only a few would be saved.

First let me preface this by saying I don't mind anybody's viewpoint religiously... I just don't tend to believe in supernatural happenings as a rule.

Those who understand the careful balance of knowing when to keep quiet about their opinions — knowing when to preface them with, «I'm not saying I really believe this...» and knowing when their opinions are welcome.

Kierkegaard's own brief preface to Purity of Heart Is to Will One Thing does little more than begin this process, and tempts me to suggest that one who is not familiar with other works of Kierkegaard, will find himself still better prepared for immersion in this address if he turns immediately to Section Twelve and reads from that point to the end.

Kierkegaard's writings — taken in themselves — provide Oden with wonderfully rich sources of plunder, especially the early pseudonymous works, with their thickets of prefaces, interludes, interjections, postscripts, appendices, multiple voices, and preposterous names, not to mention their sinuous coils of indirection.

In the Preface to Process and Reality, after having stated that his philosophy is a recurrence to pre-Kantian modes of thought, Whitehead asks if his cosmology is not a transformation of some main doctrines of Absolute Idealism onto a realistic basis.

You can't cite something as proof of your argument if you have to preface it with «That sounds a lot like...».

As indicated by the document's preface, however, the claims of the Joint Declaration can not be understood properly apart from the Annex that follows it.

If you have to preface what you are about to post with a warning that — despite the forth - coming comments — you are not racist, bigoted, closed - minded (or fill in the blank), then we've got some unfortunate news: You're probably about to write something racist, bigoted or closed - minded.

The words of Jesus in the Gospel of Thomas are present as «secret», i.e. not known in the common tradition of the Church, and it is said that «whoever finds the interpretation of them will not taste death» (Preface).

I've always found it odd that some repeat the Disciples» Prayer at all, given that Jesus prefaced it by saying, «When you are praying, do not use meaningless repetition» (Matt 6:7).

That Buber does not feel that such a way of healing is closed to the professional psychotherapist is shown by his preface to Hans Trub's posthumous book, Heilung aus der Begegnung («Healing Out of Meeting»).

He does not ignore political and economic developments, but he pays special attention to social issues, including, as he says in his preface, «the transformation of gender relations, the regeneration of the home, the disciplining of leisure and pleasure, and the establishment of segregation.»

In A Preface to Morals, an attempt at humanistic theology, Lippman charged Whitehead with having a conception of God «which is incomprehensible to all who are not highly trained logicians,» a conception which «may satisfy a metaphysical need in the thinker,» but «does not satisfy the passions of the believer,» and for the purposes of religion «is no God at all.

Let me preface this by saying that I'm not being critical of Rawls.

has to be used to preface the next statement, so that the listener does not take the statement in an unintended sense.

It is not a very good history, but it is probably as good a history as we can expect, not only because it is the best of its kind, and practically the only survival of its kind (Several other authors, according to Josephus, had undertaken to write accounts of the revolt — see the opening paragraphs of his preface to The Jewish War.

Personally, when I am giving my opinion on the interpretation of scripture, I actively choose not to preface it with, «the Lord told me» or «the Holy Spirit has guided me to this position after much prayer», etc..

One should not forget that this metaphysics is not some arid self - indulgent speculation but, as the preface for the fourth Eucharistic prayer states: «[God]... made all that is, so that you might fill your creatures with blessings and bring joy to many of them by the glory of your light.»

One trusts that the absence of Guiney and other Catholics from these pages is not because Woodworth numbers them among the «almost «Christians» or «non «Christians,» but simply because of considerations of length; in the preface he notes, for example, that he used far less than half his source material.

Whenever anyone prefaces a statement with, «This isn't about... whatever...» that's exactly what its about and this statement of «We don't mean to inflame...» is exactly what this is about.

For, as Hegel says in the preface to the Phenomenology of Spirit, «the true is comprehended and expressed not [merely] as substance but equally as subject» (RHPS 276; cf. also PG 19).

«Reality», for Panikkar, is the wholeness of Being that is constituted through God, Man and World, not the empirical reality which is of merely provisional character — as is maya in advaita - vedanta.60 Probably under pressure from the impact of Liberation Theology in the USA where Panikkar was teaching at the time, he had to face the issue of the political dimension of his theology and has reacted to it repeatedly in prefaces to his publications.

It asks whether we are not confined to the circle of human relativity which dictates that all our claims be prefaced with the qualification, «in relation to human measure.»

There are, however, hints here and there in Hegel's writings, most notably in the preface to the Philosophy of Right, that philosophy's role of discerning the rational at work in history consists in the identification of a truth to which not all actual historical circumstances in fact conform.

We don't think our book is perfect and we tell folks upfront (literally in the preface) to take what is helpful and leave the rest.

Peter Berger, in a fascinating preface to the book, asks not so much about the accuracy of Siemon - Netto's argument as about the reasons cliche - thinking about Luther and Lutheranism has continued in such an unchallenged way.

But I don't think I've ever seen that long of a preface to praying in Jesus» name.

Jonas first applied it, not to the Gospels, but to Gnosticism, in his Gnosis und spatantiker Geist, a work published as early as 1930, with an important preface by Rudolf Bultmann.