Sentences with phrase «not present action»

Most of the second act, counting screen time and not present action elapsed, takes place at night.

Not exact matches

Rather, I focused on staying present, observing what was and wasn't working, course correcting and making sure the actions we were taking were done as well as possible.

To do this, the accompanying action should be something small, like inquiring whether or not the customer needs assistance — which lets the customer know that the brand is present and available to assist as needed.

Analyzing past actions, present plans, capabilities and / or the actions of direct and obvious competitors isn't a sufficient inquiry any longer.

The movie also accurately presents the legal foundation — or «the big ass rubber stamp» in the words of one spook — that the U.S. used to build its surveillance architecture, and does so in a way that doesn't drag down the action.

Why: As a small business, it doesn't matter how enticing your online presence is if you do not present a clear call to action.

For example, if the market declines enough to clear the overbought, and overbullish components of present conditions, or if yields decline sufficiently to remove the present upward pressures we observe, and provided that market internals do not deteriorate notably, we would be left with a strenuously overvalued market, but with favorable market action and no negative syndromes.

According to these sources, Millennials demand instant gratification, place personal pursuits over work obligations, remain connected to distracting online activities 24/7/365 and don't take well to even the most positively presented constructive criticism — never mind any workplace disciplinary actions.

«It is not a regulation at the level of money... It is not a situation for the Bank of Korea to take action at present.»

As of the date of this statement your management knows of no business to be presented to the meeting that is not referred to in the accompanying notice other than the approval of the minutes of the last Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which action will not be construed as approval or disapproval of any of the matters referred to in such minutes.

Pursuant to Section 228 of the DGCL, any action required to be taken at any annual or special meeting of the stockholders may be taken without a meeting, without prior notice and without a vote if a consent or consents in writing, setting forth the action so taken, is signed by the holders of outstanding stock having not less than the minimum number of votes that would be necessary to authorize or take such action at a meeting at which all shares of our stock entitled to vote thereon were present and voted, unless the certificate of incorporation provides otherwise.

At present, the government's decision to take legal action has not been beneficial; not to the PPA holders, and certainly not the taxpayers or consumers.

Even if decentralized exchanges do not fit under any present regulatory framework, the SEC will likely take action to protect investors from unreliable and fraudulent security exchange technologies once transaction volumes escalate.

Not many ex-Communists in fact posed this question, because to do so would be to undermine the presupposition that binds Marxism with all modern forms of moral calculation; «the utilitarian attention to consequences rather than to actions themselves is liable to lead to a continuous evaluation of the present only as it leads on to some future.»

= > ok this is not biblical just my thought at the moment: God seems to show a pattern of allowing good and evil to fully present themselves before taking action.

For some it may mean that «there is an orphaned state required for the sake of the kingdom of heaven, in which a man who like all others is the child of his parents must symbolize with his being and action the present but hidden creation which is not a mere prolongation of the old, but the new creation in relation to which the old has already passed away...» This is, therefore, the first word that must be spoken: of discontinuity between the kingdom of God and any earthly order, even one as significant as the family.

Despite preemptive military action, the post - «victory» occupation of Iraq and global involvements elsewhere, America's present policy makers and public officials insist that the term «empire» simply does not apply.

The 6 Emergent Leaders who gathered in Dallas, Texas while on a book tour stop and who «through hours of prayer and discernment» diagnosed me without ever saying a word to me, and came up with an «action plan,» which by the way, only he whom shall not be named was present for, and I was in Minnesota with the kids.

A new quest of the historical Jesus «can not replace the gospel, since historical remains are not able to assure us that those fragments of Jesus» message are still relevant to us today and attest to God's present action upon us.

Without the deepest truth of Christianity — the truth which Stratford Caldecott explored so deeply and presented so well — the «mysticism, spirituality, whatever you want to call — even gnosis perhaps (not in the heretical but in the Christian sense)» — without that, all the «serious business of intellectual argument and social action» is «doomed to fail».

Rather the Kingdom of God is genuinely future, because it is not a metaphysical entity or condition, but the future action of God, which can be in no sense something given in the present.

For despite the interconnection of all the elements we must distinguish between the one saving act of Christ which is made present in the liturgy (though its efficacy is not restricted to this presence) and the external sacramental action as such.

Present action can only replicate but not actually repeat past actions, while present thoughts can not only implicate but even repeat pasPresent action can only replicate but not actually repeat past actions, while present thoughts can not only implicate but even repeat paspresent thoughts can not only implicate but even repeat past ones.

Fourth, the view here presented, since it does not proceed by way of reduction followed by reconstruction, can take actions seriously for what they purport to be, including in this case rational action.

It's a way for science to show that gravity was absolutely present and involved in setting the universe as we know it now in motion, but it it doesn't say that it caused the matter and energy to spring into existence, only into action.

This is no intuitive perception but a bold swinging into the other which demands the intensest action of my being, even as does all genuine fantasy, only here the realm of my act «is not the all - possible» but the particular, real person who steps up to meet me, the person whom I seek to make present as just so and not otherwise in all his wholeness, unity, and uniqueness.

Given the global nature of the present challenges to life, contextual theologies alone, however well developed and essential for the context, are not adequate to inspire liberative action that has also to be global.

The vigorous impacts of these men — Richard and Reinhold Niebuhr, Wilhelm Pauck, John Mackay, and later Paul Tillich and Emil Brunner, are some of them — have beaten upon me not only during semiannual week - end sessions, but day in and day out, through their writings and through my vivid, ever present memories of their minds (and bodies) in action.

Here the future is not the result of past and present actions, of faith or unbelief, repentance or sin, but a complete reversal of what would be expected.

When the present state of history and culture looks unusually black, God's immediate action in it is not so clearly seen, and the apocalyptic thinker looks far into the future, finding his hope and resting place there.

Liberalism still spiritualizes the incarnate Christ by confining his actions to so - called history, as if that were a realm in which nature and the material elements of creation were not present.

Affection measures the complexity of the perceptual apparatus since its response occurs in reference not only to real action present to the body, but also to future action.

If action is not to be misdirected or blind, consciousness must be able to extend itself beyond the immediacy of the present in order to determine future movement, i.e., to anticipate the consequences of one's own action, the action of others, to pose ends, and the means of obtaining these ends (TSMR 139).

Thus accepting responsibility for the consequences of one's actions means accepting responsibility for one's impact on the future — not just one's own future and the future of one's family and enterprise, but the future of all people in the present and in coming generations, the future of humanity.

But where true love is actually present, the rules and commands for the actions of love are not needed because love performs them naturally.

Jesus is presented as the fulfilment of natural human potentialities, with his «divinity» understood not in ontological terms but in relation to his divinely inspired response to God by which he became the brightest manifestation of God's action in human life.

After much trial and error, not to speak of a good deal of somewhat unseemly controversy, it was generally agreed that the divine Action in Christ was not to be restricted to Jesus alone, although in him it found what I have styled a «focus»; rather, that Action worldward is present and at work everywhere.

For this reason, Maritain did not hesitate in Integral Humanism (1936) to imagine possible futures or to suggest new courses of action that would alter the awful European present in the direction of a better — a more humane, more Christian — proximate future.

Referring to the criticism made by Peter Beyerhaus and some others that in the World Council's emphasis on social and political justice there is present a social utopianism which denies the fact of sin and affirms a self - redemptive humanism, Thomas admitted that the danger is always present, but pointed out the opposite danger of not admitting the fact of divine grace and the power of righteousness it releases for a daring faith in the realms of social and political action.

Christian liturgy, like other forms of sacred rituals, is «an efficacious performance that invokes the presence and action of powers which, without the ritual, would not be present or active at that time and place.»

With all the Biblical basis what we arrive at is a conclusion that the present day caters to the martyrdom is not for the cause of our contention of faith, but for our action in fulfilling God's Commandment given by our Lord Jesus Christ.

Agape takes many forms in history, and although we can not infallibly judge any human action or intention as the expression of agape, the Gospel love of neighbour and concern for the neighbour is surely present here.

We may, by such reasoning, justify our use of any means to achieve what we think are good ends on the assumption that — since history is a perennial tragedy, and collective actions are always on a lower ethical level than individual actions — we are not obligated to strive for the highest ideals possible, or to present an alternative to the usual way of the world.

In a recent interview with the Washington Post (part of their ominously titled «Voices of Power» series), Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius discussed Archbishop Joseph Naumann's request that she not present herself for communion because of her public support for legalised abortion: «Well, it was one of the most painful things I have ever experienced in my life, and I am a firm believer in the separation of church and state, and I feel that my actions as a parishioner are different than my actions as a public official and that the people who elected me in Kansas had a right to expect me to uphold their rights and their beliefs even if they did not have the same religious beliefs that I had.

A specious present can not be stretched to accommodate such moral actions without reaching the breaking point, especially when we remember Hartshorne's statement that roughly 10 - 20 actual occasions occur each second.

The hymns to God's mighty deeds are not limited to past and present actions: «with the Lord there is steadfast love, and with him is great power to redeem» (Ps.

«But where we fail to perceive individuality of action this negative fact, this failure, must not be turned into a positive affirmation, a success, the insight that no such individuality is present in that part of nature.

(2) The second act is to create a consciousness, that the present form of crisis has evolved from human actions and is not divinely ordained.

But because the past is not there determinatively, the present action, finally, is explicable only in terms of itself.

Although Whitehead has successfully avoided the traditional problem of evil by his dipolar doctrine of God, he seems to have presented us with another problem of evil in the sense that God is not only unavoidably implicated in the actions of finite occasions, but to the extent that pleasure is realized by occasions God derives enjoyment in his consequent nature also.