Sentences with phrase «not prove to the world»

Fifteen months is a hell of a long time to have undergone surgery and go through rehab and not prove to the world, so everyone can shut up, and throw a nice tight spiral ball 60 yards.

Not exact matches

Most, if not all cryptocurrency investors today are in for a world of pain if Strongin's prediction proves to be accurate.

These risks and uncertainties include, among others: the unfavorable outcome of litigation, including so - called «Paragraph IV» litigation and other patent litigation, related to any of our products or products using our proprietary technologies, which may lead to competition from generic drug manufacturers; data from clinical trials may be interpreted by the FDA in different ways than we interpret it; the FDA may not agree with our regulatory approval strategies or components of our filings for our products, including our clinical trial designs, conduct and methodologies and, for ALKS 5461, evidence of efficacy and adequacy of bridging to buprenorphine; clinical development activities may not be completed on time or at all; the results of our clinical development activities may not be positive, or predictive of real - world results or of results in subsequent clinical trials; regulatory submissions may not occur or be submitted in a timely manner; the company and its licensees may not be able to continue to successfully commercialize their products; there may be a reduction in payment rate or reimbursement for the company's products or an increase in the company's financial obligations to governmental payers; the FDA or regulatory authorities outside the U.S. may make adverse decisions regarding the company's products; the company's products may prove difficult to manufacture, be precluded from commercialization by the proprietary rights of third parties, or have unintended side effects, adverse reactions or incidents of misuse; and those risks and uncertainties described under the heading «Risk Factors» in the company's most recent Annual Report on Form 10 - K and in subsequent filings made by the company with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission («SEC»), which are available on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov.

And yet he must prove the business wisdom behind it, not only to keep Gravity from sinking — and going down with the ship himself — but also to achieve his long - term goal of transforming the business world.

It isn't enough to tell investors there's a need for your product; you need hard facts and real - world examples to prove it, says Danny Warshay, founder of DEW Ventures, a Providence, R.I. - based firm that provides startup coaching.

In the days to come the Fed will have to prove that a new set of tools for managing interest rates will work as expected; see how higher U.S. rates affect domestic and global financial conditions; and hope that weak world demand and commodity prices do not lead to an overall bout of deflation and force the Fed to reverse course.

They want to prove to the world what they're willing to sacrifice and they're not going to get that here.»

But as she proved at last year's world championships when she became the first swimmer to win all four freestyle distances — 200m, 400m, 800m and 1500m — distance isn't her only specialty.

«Requiring the banks to pay treble damages to every plaintiff who ended up on the wrong side of an independent Libor ‐ denominated derivative swap would, if appellants» allegations were proved at trial, not only bankrupt 16 of the world's most important financial institutions, but also vastly extend the potential scope of antitrust liability in myriad markets where derivative instruments have proliferated,» the U.S. Court of Appeals in New York said in the ruling.A U.S. appeals court on Monday revived private antitrust litigation accusing major banks of conspiring to manipulate the Libor benchmark interest rate, in a big setback for their defense against investors» claims of market - rigging.

Via its Laser Ignition Fusion Energy (LIFE) project, the National Ignition Facility (NIF) in the United States has a unique double mandate: not only must it prove fusion power can be a viable source of energy — and become a game - changer for the world's energy supply — but it must also plan to commercialize the energy source even before practical fusion energy is a reality.

Guerrilla Marketing to Heal the World proves marketing and making the world a better place are not mutually excluWorld proves marketing and making the world a better place are not mutually excluworld a better place are not mutually exclusive.

You can be a power player and prove to yourself, the world or to whomever all you want, but you can not tell other women what they «should» do with there own lives.

Not merely a collection of good ideas, this book spells out the 67 timeless principles and practices used by the world's most successful men and women — proven principles and strategies that can be adapted for your own life, whether you want to be the best salesperson in your company, become a leading architect, score top grades in school, lose weight, buy your dream home, make millions, or just get back in the job market.

Canada would not deliver control of its oil sands — the world's third - largest proven reserves of crude — to a foreign government, Harper insisted.

To prove it wasn't joking, the Fed shut down activity on Dwolla, the company that transacts online payments for the world's largest Bitcoin exchange, Tokyo - based Mt. Gox.

Which has been proven to not be the dirtiest oil in the world.

That said, gold has proven itself as a reliable store of value for millennia; its universal appeal means that it can be converted to cash anywhere in the world; and its value is not limited by the border of any one jurisdiction.

As I write in a recent paper, «Brave New World: Investing for Longer Retirements,» this rule is likely to prove less effective in today's environment of longer lives, fewer traditional pensions and low interest rates, where many people haven't saved enough to finance a multi-decade retirement.

NAZI's didn't pick on people who were gay (once again if you think you can prove this point, please point us in the direction of said evidence), they set out to rid the world of JEWS.

The reason some scientists want to prove time really does not exist is that if times does not exist then they can unify the «subatomic atomic world of quantum mechanics with the vast cosmic one of general relativity.»

and apparently you cant seem to understand that you can not prove how we came to be here, You will never be able to go back and observe the creation of the world so..

@Kingofthenet: I'll tell u exactly how he did it, Genesis 1:1 - 31: He created the world in 6 days, then He created man, and on the 7th, He rested (that's where a week came from) @momoya: If Atheists don't need to prove things, why ask Christians to do the same?

Some of the greatest minds in the world believe these things do exist, but haven't been able to prove them.

This may come as a shock to you — BUT - evolution could not be proven beyond a reasonable doubt in court — if it is a «Law» of science and not a theory explain to me why Scientist in the same field have differing opinions theory has undergone massive changes since the 1850's when Darwin first came up with the THEORY — there are a lot of interesting similarities to true science which makes it sound so plausible, but it should sound good — After all the top scientist / humanists in the world promote it and they are all pretty smart

So the civilized world not only gets slap and has to prove who slapped and weather he was Madrasa trained yada yada yada...

I don't think he's clued in to the fact that this is the World Wide Web yet... only proves how small minded he is.

I will not argue whether or not the bible is the word of a god translated by man, my only question is, why would you follow a book that supports and idolizes a single deity who seems to have intentions of converting the world to his worship alone (for if there are no other gods, why then would Yahweh require that you «hold no other gods above him» — he just confirmed their existance) when said deity's followers have proven that their purpose in life is to grind any opposition to their «holy law» into dust?

and being aware of your environment, being respectful of those of all beliefs and none beliefs, and of our world, and its about personal responsibility, with that said why is is such a bad thing to believe in something greater than yourself, how can somebody live there life without believing in something, what kind of life is that, life is meant to be discovered, its one big mystery, and all the science in the world can still not prove how we exactly came to be?

ragansteve1 If you're saying that there isn't enough time in the world to prove your points, I'd have to agree.

do I need any approval before I practice my religion, do I have to prove my religion before I practice, my holy book further describe that you must carry a gun in 21st century because there is too much crime in this world, but it doesn't say much about if I migrate to another country these rules will still apply, Or I should modified them according to my comfort, like talking in English which is not my religious language wearing pants or not, having education or not, standing in line or not, I am so confused what should I do can someone help me, should I go back to country where my religion originated or back in time ask my guru questions about western world confusion, or just decide by myself what suites me, or preach other develop country that you guys are wrong be peaceful.

How many bones of ancient humans and our ancestors do they have to dig up to «prove» that the world was not created 6,000 years ago?

My life may not have meaning, but if I try very hard, and do very well, it could have quite a lot of meaning, real meaning, that will be felt here in the real world, not in a possible reward in a realm that can't be proven to be anything other than imaginary.

It seemed to me that the truly sovereign God could not be regarded as absent or superfluous in ordinary human experience and philosophical reflection, but that every single reality should prove incomprehensible (at least in its depth) without recourse to God, if he actually was the Creator of the world as Barth thought him to be.

Living dogmatically in a non-dogmatic world soon proves silly; tell a nation like ours to not eat bacon because pigs are «unclean» rather than explain that it was tricky to cook pork 2000 years ago over a fire and made people sick.

Now, if you're referring to someone seeking funding to prove that the Biblical account of the world - wide flood is true, that would be denied because it's a theological question, not a scientific one.

These rather general remarks do not prove anything, of course; they only suggest one must live in an Aristotelian world to draw genetic successiveness so close to physical time as to call both time.

The revelational rap against apologetic theology is that it either engages in a sellout to the «world» (the self - disclosure of God being so utterly relativized by human wisdom that Christians are unable to tell atheists anything that they don't already know), or it is an exercise in various intellectual imperialisms, such as: «We can prove the existence of God» or «If human culture really understood itself, it would find that it is striving toward that which we already have.»

Adam's eagerness to snatch the prize of equality with God — the desire of Everyman to set himself up in the place of God as absolute master of a world which is really not his own, but God's — is replaced by the second Adam's total self - surrender: his obedience to the point of accepting the death of the Cross; death which paradoxically leads to life, whereas the consequence of Adam's self - glorification proved to be death.

But the world is swayed by the rantings of people who tell us what to do based on a book written by men about something we can not prove exists.

Science doesn't look to prove, it looks to explain the world around us.

Thus, the admonition in 12:2 not to be conformed to the world but to be transformed so that one can «prove» or «discern» God's «good, acceptable and perfect will» is not a general admonition.

Man is held responsible for his actions: Revelation 20:11 - 15; Galatians 6:7; 1 Corinthians 5:10 The very fact that they are suicidal (ready and willing to kill themselves) proves: 1 Samuel 15:23; Romans 5:1 Suicide goes directly against: Matthew 24:13; John 15:1 - 6; Romans 11:22; 1 Corinthians 15:2; Colossians 1:23; Hebrews 3:6, 14; 12:25; and 1 John 5:4 Committing suicide is not enduring to the end: Matthew 24:13 It is not abiding in Christ: John 15:1 - 6 It is not continuing in His goodness: Romans 11:22 It is not holding fast the word: 1 Corinthians 15:2 It is being moved away from the hope of the gospel: Colossians 1:23 It is not holding fast the confidence and the rejoicing of the hope firm to the end: Hebrews 3:6 It is not holding the beginning of our confidence steadfast to the end: Hebrews 3:14 It is refusing and turning away from Him who speaks from heaven: Hebrews 12:25 It is not overcoming the world: 1 John 5:4 It is being overcome by the world and the devil: 1 Peter 5:8; 1 John 5:18

The classical «proofs» may illustrate the God - world relationship, but they do not prove it, and the Barthians were right to criticize them on this ground.

We can not prove a metaphysical connection, just as the thousands of reported miracle healings or other presumed answers to prayer can not be proved to the satisfaction of the Humes and the Kants of the world.

Then, a new lie materializes as the world tells us we are amazing and we don't have to prove ourselves.

Science is integral to Christian discernment as it relates to the physical world and evolution of mankind is most likely scientific fact but not yet proven — has nothing to do with doctrine.

You can say that it works that way because «God» designed it to be so, and noone can prove you wrong; but to say it isn't that way is to deny the world around you.

As a scientist, I'm always asking questions about the world we live in and I don't fault other scientists trying to prove evolution because that is the question they are passionate about.

If He suddenly wanted to prove to everyone (once and for all) that He really does exist, and He took a giant index finger visable to everyone in the world, and wrote in the sky, «I AM YOUR GOD»... we wouldn't doubt His existence, but we would be frightened to death of Him.

Because it is not the function of science to deal with what lies beyond the observable world that is open to scientific investigation, science does not seek to prove the existence of God.