Sentences with phrase «not providing paid sick leave»

Not exact matches

All other private employers will be required to provide up to 64 hours of paid sick leave... So - called micro-businesses, with five or fewer employees, will also be required to give paid sick leave, but not until October 2020.

The proposed bill, agreed to by the mayor and Council Speaker Melissa Mark - Vivertio but not yet introduced or passed in the council, will expand the size of businesses required to provide paid sick leave from 15 or more employees to 5 or more employees, accelerate it's applicability so that all covered businesses must comply by April 1, 2014 (businesses with 15 - 20 employees have until April 1, 2015 under the existing law), remove exemptions for manufacturing businesses and remove economic measurements that could have caused a delayed implementation and expand the range of family members that employees can care for during such paid sick leave.

«This is partly due to collective - bargaining agreements, but also state laws that guarantee such benefits as paid sick days, extended medical leave, and maternity leave, which charters are not required to provide,» said Caputo - Pearl, head of United Teachers Los Angeles.

As such, if your employer does not provide you with paid sick leave, you will have no entitlement in this regard.

A: No, not unless the terms of your employment agreement provide for paid sick leave.

For example, if an employer already provided 5 days of paid sick leave per year, the ESA PEL requirements would not require an additional two paid days.

For instance, providing for three paid sick days a year would not qualify as a greater benefit to PEL, as PEL provides 10 days of job - protected leave for a wider array of reasons.

For employers who aren't located in New York City, San Francisco, or other jurisdictions that require paid sick leave, there is generally no requirement to provide employees with paid sick time — even if those employees were forced to go home.