Sentences with phrase «not real discussion»

Not exact matches

Not all real estate markets would call for any sort of a discussion like this.

The takeaway from this study couldn't be clearer, according to Granneman — whenever possible swap real discussions for just shooting the breeze.

Cliqz, the German privacy browser that bought anti-tracking plugin Ghostery in February, believes the discussions don't solve the real problem of privacy and tracking.

This discussion also does not consider any specific facts or circumstances that may be relevant to holders subject to special rules under the U.S. federal income tax laws, including, without limitation, certain former citizens or long - term residents of the United States, partnerships or other pass - through entities, real estate investment trusts, regulated investment companies, «controlled foreign corporations,» «passive foreign investment companies,» corporations that accumulate earnings to avoid U.S. federal income tax, banks, financial institutions, investment funds, insurance companies, brokers, dealers or traders in securities, commodities or currencies, tax - exempt organizations, tax - qualified retirement plans, persons subject to the alternative minimum tax, persons that own, or have owned, actually or constructively, more than 5 % of our common stock and persons holding our common stock as part of a hedging or conversion transaction or straddle, or a constructive sale, or other risk reduction strategy.

Some Prefatory Remarks to the N.Y.U. Real Estate Institute discussion, Oct. 25, 2001 Economic theory focuses on labor and capital, yet the largest category of tangible assets is not industrial plant and machinery earning profits, but real estate, and its primary objective is to make capital gaReal Estate Institute discussion, Oct. 25, 2001 Economic theory focuses on labor and capital, yet the largest category of tangible assets is not industrial plant and machinery earning profits, but real estate, and its primary objective is to make capital gareal estate, and its primary objective is to make capital gains.

Displaying what Donald (now Dierdre) McCloskey once characterized as «the intellectual range from M to N,» there is no real comparison of the Fed's record with that of the system that preceded it; no mention of other monetary systems circa 1913 that had better records than the United States (most pertinently, that of Canada); not nearly enough acknowledgment of the great harm the Fed has caused more than once in its history; no discussion of why a few other central banks — though surprisingly, only a few — have performed better than the Fed; and no inkling that central banking may not be the best of all possible systems in the best of all possible worlds.

The reason why group interview articles are so great to read, is because they are usually packed with real life examples (not guesses or assumptions), case studies, tips from the field and some form of link building discussion.

Investing in real estate while holding a full time job may not always get the most discussion in the real estate investing world — but there are thousands (if not millions) of investors who do just that.

Quite frankly, I'm not interested in any «intelligent discourse which is little more than a circle jerk of a discussion where privileged people sit around and abstractly theorize about what the «real problems» of and «solutions to» marginalized people's problems that doesn't center the words and experiences of actual marginalized people and their own understanding of their own problems.

I do not want to open the floor to simple confirmations of what I am saying, but to real and genuine discussion as we earnestly explore truth and its implications together.

I can not help but think that his discussion of the Eucharist displays a real tension in Farrow's thinking.

Can't atheists handle real theological discussions concerning Christianity?

Our choice of topic is also occasioned by a recent discussion in The Tablet about the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist, whether it is a physical presence or not.

I wouldn't expect a real discussion from either of them.

Fedup doesn't want to have a real discussion on the issue.

He must really risk mutual discussion with the world, must take for granted that he will not only teach but learn thereby, that the whole truth is always richer and more mysterious than what he has already explicitly grasped, that between the real truth of yesterday, today and tomorrow there exists a deeper hidden agreement than is realized either by insensitive innovators or diehard defenders of the old at any price.

You shouldn't be having those discussions since you're clueless on the REAL truth.

From the discussion of inspiration it appears that the real issue is not that of effective apologetics, but one of theological interpretation.

Therefor, for the purpose of this discussion, you should not be surprised if I claim to know right along with you — so, to reiterate — I know that you don't know that your God is real.

To say this is to take for granted — what indeed has been taken for granted throughout this discussion — that the resurrection of Christ is not to be thought of as a mere belief which arose as a result of reflection on the «real» event (namely, the career of Jesus), but that the resurrection belongs essentially to the event itself.

The discussion of assisted nutrition and hydration in dementia is good too, though it's a bit of a shame that the expert came from the US (where tube feeding is prevalent) and did not come from the UK, where it is almost prohibited, and where there is a real fear that tube feeding may be a burdensome and inappropriate intervention to the point where people may be treated less than they should.

But this difference, which may be less real and important than I think, does not obscure my appreciation of the truth and brilliance of Dr. Morrison's discussion of the concreteness of revelation and of its inseparable connection with the community.

The faith - group programs, representing Protestant, Catholics, and Jews, have consistently provided documentaries, dramas, and discussions which dealt with issues almost never touched by commercial broadcasting: the economic factors behind nuclear armaments; the issues behind draft evasion (during the Vietnam War); the real causes of worldwide starvation; and the problems of people who are ignored almost completely by the media, such as the aging who can not live on their pensions, unwed mothers, farm workers who have no homes, undocumented aliens whom we wish to employ but not pay, and refugees we are sending back to certain death in their own countries.

Indeed, at least some colleagues outside of our department seem not at all opposed to the discussion and articulation of real theology — in their terms, real religion — within what is, after all, a department of religion.

The reason is clear: the discussion about existence as a perfection, as if that were all that is involved, does not make explicit the far more important point that, in the case of «God,» properly understood, nonexistence was never a real possibility, a consideration entirely overlooked by those who blithely say that, of course, we all know that no existence can be derived from «mere» ideas.

Everyone seems to blame God for whatever their problem is, if He is not real whats the point of a discussion.

You just can't get any real discussions going anymore, can you?

This isn't to say we shouldn't make the change to a large degree in many areas, just that political correctness prohibits discussion of some very real issues.

-- Unfortunately some (restaurants and) relatives still do not share this oppinion, which is leading to funny (preposterous even) discussions over the dinner table lately e.g. «Is christmas without meat a real christmas?»

When things appear hopeful, it's difficult to find a receptive audience, whereas when things invariably go south the response is usually so vile that entering the fray seems overkill and certainly not conducive to having a rational discussion about the real underlying issues.

«The FIFA ExCo has the power to make decisions and if at the FIFA ExCo this issue starts to be a real point for discussion then why not, and then again maybe the FIFA ExCo will say based on medical reports or whatever we really have to look at playing the World Cup not in summer, but in winter,» he said.

According to Giants announcer Mike Krukow, when a reliever is in a real mess and the pitching coach goes out to talk to him, the discussion isn't about strategy or moral support.

So, I am likely very biased and not the most open - minded in this discussion; but regardless, the creation of cement is a very real concern that most people are not aware of.

To an alternate topic of discussion i will just like to point out n remind arsenal fans dat ARSENAL is a top top club and shud be compared to only the likes of man u, chelsea, barca, real, bayern n maybe liverpool, we hav acceptd medocrity 4 far 2 long, finishing 4th n elimination in d 2nd stage of UCL is a failure, we shud be aiming for top2 and d semi finals of UCL... wenger has taking us so low... after d FA cup win we shud hav sign 3 world class players n bloster our squad, if we hav per, olivier, ramsey on the bench as back up 4 world class players then we know were movin forward

This isn't just a fantasy discussion though, as there's a real chance Ricciardo could end up going to Mercedes in 2019.

Lucky for us, the real gooners, Wenger does not complain and does not get depressed (well, I wouldn't for that load of money either but that's another discussion) by these issues.

United were hopeful of engaging Real in a transfer discussion if Bale didn't start in the Super Cup, but the Welsh winger started.

I will refrain from writing my own due to the length of the discussion board as it is, but I do want to express a few thoughts: - Because of the «breast is best» campaign, I firmly believe that even if doctors, pediatricians, midwives et cetera know about the real trouble that many women have BF, they will not say anything so that moms still try.

It doesn't excuse care that emphasizes feelings and what you eat over testing, discussion of real risks and treatment and monitoring.

In real life, socializing is having discussions with your elderly neighbor, working with co-workers of all ages, genders, and races, checking out with grocery clerks, talking to your spouse (also likely not the same age as you), and of course, spending time with your kids.

From the first day of school, make sure your child knows there will be a real conversation about school every evening — not just a half - hearted attempt at discussion and one - word answers.

The real problem is the tired, cynical approach it still seems to take to whatever the topic is, harrumphing at anyone and anything it doesn't quite understand and eschewing real discussion in favour of a bust up.

While an MP might owe his or her place in parliament, or even cabinet, not due to patronage from above, but because he was an NUM MP, or had backing from the public sector unions, or the London Labour Party etc, s / he could enter into those discussions pre-vote from a position of real stregnth.

The resulting discussion went beyond the basics of using web video for electoral and advocacy campaigns, delving into real detail about what works and what doesn't.

«There hasn't been any real discussions except overall what we want to see happen.»

And just as in the real world, the end result may be NEW social connections, since people who «meet» through this discussion thread can start their own side conversations, as can people who read the comments but don't add their own in public.

«We've had conversations, I've talked to Senator Flanagan and the governor and Senator Flanagan and I have spoken, but we haven't had any real detailed discussions,» Heastie told reporters after his remarks.

Mayor Bill de Blasio claimed again tonight that he did not break any laws when he had a private consultant who represents various real estate interests participate in discussions about his rezoning proposals — but said he will disclose his interactions with outside advisers in the future anyway.

Mr. Cornegy, who issued a public congratulations on Twitter on Friday, told Mr. Johnson that he wanted a position with real power, not just the role of majority leader, which had been offered to him, according to a person briefed on the discussion.

LaBarbera and representatives of construction labor management funds, which advocate for companies that use organized labor and related unions, said it was clear the real estate lobbying group had more sway at City Hall than they did, given that they were not invited into the 421 - a discussions the administration and REBNY had engaged in.