Sentences with phrase «not real freedom»

«The notion that Christians may exercise their faith on Sundays but forget about it when they step into work on Monday is not real freedom of religion and is not freedom of conscience,» Scoffield told the court.

Not exact matches

Of course, this guide is not an all - encompassing «how - to» manual about every aspect of investing in real estate, but a broad - stroke overview of the best ways to start down your path to financial freedom through real estate investments.

I'd like to believe that my good deeds and my bad deeds are acts of invisible men... but I can't help but feel empowered by my one and only REAL RIGHT and REAL FREEDOM, free choice.

We won't experience real freedom from worry unless we start by naming it.

Perhaps that's the real freedom we should be worried about — not whether or not someone has the right to attempt to sabotage someone else's idea of a great club, but whether I have the right to form my own club that expresses my own ideas with people I choose to invite to associate with me.

Thanks to the internet things are not as hidden as they use to be, but there are still those that would rather suppress our freedoms to know what goes on in the real world.

If pastoral solutions to the contemporary challenges to marriage are not grounded in what God has revealed about marriage, they will not lead to real freedom and happiness.

Though blacks» tutelage has not been entirely self - incurred, the link between liberation and enlightenment is just as real for us: the black nonviolent disobedient realizes his own freedom by accepting the constraints of universal moral laws, by maintaining civility under strong provocation even when others do not.

If we remain mere amateurs in the actual Christian life, if we have not in some way accepted to obey a law within the context of Christian freedom and self - restraint, then we are no more than miserable bunglers even if we do not carry too much real ballast of historical piety.

Process doctrines can go the whole way with existentialism in recognizing that man in his freedom may plunge into self - worship, or self - destruction; but this is because the real world has this risk within it, not because God wills that any creature should lose the meaning of life or decrees that any person should lose his possibility of knowing the good and doing it.

Though two speak of «freedom of choice» and a few give no real theological rationale for their position, virtually all the statements of this type are concerned not with human freedom or women's rights, but with articulating solid theological and philosophical reasons for the position they take.

But the relief of REAL freedom and REAL choice inherent in the Obama and Senate wins is palpable, and we can also rest easy that the Supreme Court will not be filled up with more people - haters working against this country.

If i'm just somebody elses pet project and was meant to happen and my life was preordained then it's a 1 to 1 odds that I am who I am and that means i'm just another chess piece on someone elses board and have no real freedom and no real future even if I was to imagine some fluffy afterlife stroking Gods ego for eternity, that is not for me.

He does not accept that the real greater good comes from the efforts of individuals exercising their freedom and that government exists principally to enable them to pursue their inalienable rights of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

We are not Christ, but if we want to be Christians, we must have some share in Christ's large - heartedness by acting with responsibility and in freedom when the hour of danger comes, and by showing a real sympathy that springs, not from fear, but from the liberating and redeeming love of Christ for all who suffer.

The laws of nature are valid but they» are not deterministic, they allow for freedom, and so for conflicts and frustrations that are not specifically providential (divine punishments, educational devices, or...) but are simply examples of creatures partly making themselves and one another, under the general guidance which insures that symbiosis and mutual helpfulness are as real as self - assertion and predation.

The problem is this: Neutrality is a theory about freedom of religion in a world that does not and can not actually exist, whereas accommodationism, although a theory about the real world, is not really a theory about freedom of religion.

The solution to this lack of real public and personal life is not freedom of feeling, writes Buber.

«The gays were taken off the dsm not with any real studies and the first amendment gives all religious freedom and guarantees it, it does not guarantee gays rights only the right to express a opinion.»

Get out and support our businesses support freedom of speech support moral values, Its about time that the retailers see where the real buying power is to support them not the minority

The opposite of compulsion is not freedom but communion, says Buber, and this communion comes about through the child's first being free to venture on his own and then encountering the real values of the teacher.

Real love, as distinct from limerence, does not destroy the freedom of the beloved.

Real freedom belongs not to the isolated individual, but to the person who can maintain his individuality and integrity even as he accepts his interdependence with other life.

If not, is freedom real?

But the real possibility of such an absolute contradiction in freedom can not be denied, though it is denied and doubted in vulgar everyday theology.

Not looking for something «new» per se, but what can bring real freedom, kinda going back to David's original remarks.

Why, then, is the transcendental horizon of freedom not only the condition of its possibility, but also its real «object»?

We can not here pose the question of the real knowability of freedom in the theory of knowledge.

Hence the true, indeed the only real problem of freedom In society does not consist in this, that an individual or an organized community unjustly deprives someone of a measure of freedom which it might well accord him, but that it must distribute the one finite sphere of freedom in such a way that all receive their due.

By contrast, our achievements in freedom and prosperity seem both valuable and real, even if we sometimes exaggerate them and even if they may not endure to the end of time.

You express American religious freedom very well right there at the beginning of your post: «consider yourself what you wish... doesn't make it so...» Yet they are not concerned with what is actually real, but only what they believe in their heads using emotional and cultural feedback to reinforce their beliefs.

If, on the plane of moral evil rather than physical or «natural» evil, one replies that with the real freedom of the free will goes the real power of personal sanctifying grace to sweeten and transform our personalities if we will allow Him, the rejoinder comes, «well, yes, but if He is almighty why does He not stop me from sinning and going to hell?»

However it is depicted and however necessary it seems to be as a corollary to our freedom, hell is only a possibility for typical theology — a real possibility, but not necessarily an actualized one.

Where you do not have this freedom to be real, you do not have a real friendship.

I agree with Bill Maher, but then again I'm a lifelong atheist... I have never believed for one minute that the god as portrayed in the bible or koran has any possibility of being real to everyone, otherwise that god would make itself obvious and not hide behind man made lies and cultural practices that self perpetuate thanks fo fear... otherwise there would not be several thousand man made religions trying to claim that god as their own... yes, it is an opinion, only valid to the opinion holder and no one else... Bill, thanks for so strongly making that point, not that it makes any difference to god fearing people... they will hold on to their opinion as strongly as they hold on to their shotgun, thinking that each provides them with some form of security... to intelligent people, neither is secure and neither leads to true freedom of the mind...

He thus referred the man to a look at his real motivation - desire for freedom to loose the bonds of matrimony not for legitimate reasons — adultery - but for whim.

More than 4k at DC Basilica for bishops» relig freedom Mass, sermon: «Real freedom isn't something (government) can give or take away.»

Hasker next suggests that my position on the nature of intrinsic value is counter-intuitive by concluding — from my argument that within the Hick1 - lasker type of theism our enjoyment of freedom could be the same whether we had real or only apparent freedom (as Hick himself had said)-- that I would hold that falsely thinking one is loved and knows the truth is «just as valuable» as really knowing the truth and really being loved, so that these latter relations are «not of any worth in themselves.»

Unlike the McCarthy era, most threats to academic freedom — real or perceived — do not, yet, involve the state.»

In real freedom we can not be irritated by those not yet having awakened to the freedom of mind by realising we are all one, because they «do not yet know what they are doing».

Theology is the highest indeed, and widest, but it does not interfere with the real freedom of any secular science in its own particular department.»

«He emphasised the real role of the Church — not seeking a protected status within an official structure, but operating in true freedom, offering an authentic message.

Mind, spirit, human evaluation, and appreciation, the sense of freedom of choice, and the like were supposed to be merely epiphenomenal, like the steam of a locomotive, which does not make any real difference to the running of the engine.

The religious freedom resulting from this tolerance is real enough; what is unreal is the assumption that religious convictions that can not be acted on in public will nonetheless continue to function in private as if they could be.

Communist dogma goes on to state that economic forces — not human aspirations for freedom, nor other political ideals — are the real shapers of history.

If a couple realise they started their marriage on a poor basis, it does not follow thatthey can reject their marriage vow; it should lead them to seek the grace to ground their relationship in the real freedom of the truth and goodness of their being, lived for God and for each other.

To dare and do not what one wills, but what is right, To not float in what would be possible, but valiantly grasping what is real, freedom is not in the flight of thoughts, but only in deeds.

This does not diminish or remove the freedom and methodology of the sciences, for example, because if we have rightly understood the structure of the universe unto Christ, we will see that matter in the universe does indeed have a real consistency to be explored, even if its completion will be achieved only on a higher level.

We somehow got on the topic of dream jobs now that we've all been working in the real world for about a decade, and I wasn't surprised to hear that we all had visions of creative and passionate careers that gave us the freedom to travel and explore regularly.

players like Ozil always present the fans with a bit of a conundrum, especially when times are tough... if you look around the sporting world every once in awhile there emerges a player with incredible skill, like Ozil, Matt Sundin or even Jay Cutler, who have a different way about themselves... their movement seemed almost too lackadaisical, so much so that it seemed to suggest indifference or even disinterest on the part of the player... their posture always appears somewhat mopey and they generally have an unflattering «sour puss» expression on their face... for some their above average skills are enough to keep them squarely in the mix, as their respective teams try desperately to find a way to get the best out of them visa vie player acquisitions or the reworking of tactics... when things go according to planned the fans usually find a way to accept their unique disposition, whereas when things go awry they become easy targets for fans and pundits alike... in the case of Ozil and Sundin, their successes on the international stage and / or with their former teams led many to conclude that if we surrounded such talented individuals with players that have those skills that would most likely bring the best of these players success would surely follow... unfortunately both the Maple Leafs and our club chose to adopt half - measures, as each were being run by corporations who valued profitability over providing the best possible product on the field... for them, they cared more about shirt sales and season tickets than doing whatever was necessary... this isn't, by any stretch, an attempt to absolve Ozil of any responsibility for his failures on the pitch... there is no doubt oftentimes his efforts were underwhelming, to say the least, but this club has been inept when it comes to providing this prolific passer with the kind of players necessary for him to flourish... with our poor man's version of Benzema up front, the headless chickens in Walcott, the younger Ox and Welbeck occupying wide positions far too often and the fact that Carzola, who provided Ozil with great service and more freedom to roam, was never truly replaced, the only real skilled outlet on the pitch was Sanchez... remember to be considered a world - class set - up man goals need to be scored and for much of his time here he has been surrounded by some incredibly inept finishers... in the end, I'm not sure how long he will be in North London, recent sentiments and his present contract situation seem to suggest that he will depart at season's end, but how tragic would it be if once again we didn't put our best foot forward and failed to make those moves that could have brought championship football back to our once beloved club... so when you think about this uniquely skilled player don't be so quick to shift all the blame on his shoulders because he will not be the first or the last highly skilled player to find disappointment at the Emirates if we don't rid the club of those individuals that are truly to blame for our current woes