Sentences with phrase «not refer the question»

Furthermore, as predicted in the previous post on revocation, at paragraph 36 the UK Supreme Court proceeds on the assumption of the irreversibility of notice under Article 50 TEU once it is given, and did not refer the question to the Court of Justice through the preliminary reference procedure of Article 267 TFEU.

My understanding of Achmea is that the Court considers it contrary to EU law for a MS to enter into an agreement which may cause it to be bound by decisions of a tribunal if (i) the tribunal may take decisions affecting EU law in that state — which is almost inevitable for any trade or investment tribunal, and (ii) it can not refer questions to the Court, and (iii) there is no possibility to substantively review the decisions in the MS courts.

Not exact matches

The embassy didn't directly respond to questions on whether the booking was intended to influence the president, referring instead to the ambassador's column.

«We did face supply chain challenges last year, but the full - price channels in North America are now clean,» Edwards said in emailed answers to questions from Reuters, referring to new stock that would not have to be discounted.

State police referred questions about the incident involving El Marro to state prosecutors, who did not respond to requests for comment.

When contacted to confirm that Kulich had worked for him, Shkreli referred all questions to his attorney, Benjamin Brafman, who, when reached, said he would not comment on anything related to Shkreli's case.)

«Some don't know that they may be eligible for multiple benefits; others just simply don't understand the question,» she says, noting that the question applies only to those who are still eligible to «restrict the scope of the application to spousal benefits only» or what some refer to as filing a restricted application.

In this morning's hearing with the House Energy and Commerce Committee, New Mexico Representative Ben Lujan cornered Mark Zuckerberg with a question about so - called «shadow profiles» — the term often used to refer to the data that Facebook collects on non-users and other hidden data that Facebook holds but does not offer openly on the site for users to see.

As to dodging the pervasive question let me refer to the dozens of other religions that dominate the other 60 % of the worlds population that are not Christian.

Lauren: I read the blog you refer to when you posted it on the other thread, about asking questions and not being satisfied with the answers.

Now, if you're referring to someone seeking funding to prove that the Biblical account of the world - wide flood is true, that would be denied because it's a theological question, not a scientific one.

If in this connection we would only refer to the testimony of the Spirit who speaks in and through Scripture, this would indeed be correct and would be acknowledged also in Catholic theology; but we would not yet have reached the question where the dialogue touches the human dimension as such.

As to the question «do you believe believe god exists» I wasn't refering to the Christian god specifically... just any god, even a diestic one.

Don't dodge the real question: why does your god refer to bats as birds?

Once all the disclaimers have been made — that many religious beliefs are supremely difficult to test for truth because they refer to the supernatural or to that which it is beyond our mental powers to discern, or because (in the case of faith) they are values and not truth - claims — once all this has been said, we still have to admit that yes, of course the question of truth enters in here.

The why in one instance refers to cause, in the other to purpose; and an answer to one of these questions will not do for the other.

It is not the intention of any criticisms in this volume to debate such questions as whether the supernatural events referred to by a theologian in fact took place.

Hence, to answer the question of what the Bible says, there is no great advantage in deciding just which biblical words do, and which do not, refer specifically to homosexuality.

aisha: not sure if your comment refers to my post, but my question is always: what is IT that addresses my own «embarrassment» (literally: behind bars) and constraints, the I guess shackles or blinders which David enumerates as group, theology, hermeneutics, theology — and I expand to bias, prejudice, agenda, fears, anger etc etc etc..

In the full article, I did briefly refer to that article I wrote about paganism, but I didn't deal with your question specifically.

In the paper printed here on Thomas, Hartshorne refers to the Angelic Doctor's claim that we can not know what God is but only what God is not (cf. Summa Theologica I, question 3).

@Will, Your statement / questions are not clear, or at least I'm not clear on what they are referring to.

The «we» in this question does not refer to our individual selves, as though we were isolated persons who could have a life apart from the church or apart from the nation and the race.

I do not believe it is a question if the Qur «an and Bible refer to the same God.

Rather, it is for him a profoundly spiritual question, because he finds behind authoritarianism an image of God which refers to a severe ruler who does not support humans in their own being but hinders them.

For the expression in question does not refer to the Lordship over Creation, nor to presiding over the works of God, but is meant to reveal in part the intention of the Incarnation» (sect. 1.1 ff).

That's the only question I see you asking, but I don't see what it is referring to.

I was asked a lot of questions about other verses as well - what Christians believe about the second coming (one of the worst jobs we've done of helping non-Christians understand) I told them I did not have all the answers of everything God was going to do and exactly how everything would work out, that may be what you're referring to.

The rest of this post is going to question whether or not passages like Luke 17:20 - 24 and Mark 14:62 actually refer to Jesus» second coming.

McKnight believes that the focus of this passage is on asking questions, and that the women to which Paul referred were not yet educated theologically or biblically as well as the men.

In this essay, I have referred only to the book of Genesis and thus have chosen not to mention the prohibitions against homosexuality included in Leviticus, for it seems to me that what is at stake now is not homosexuality, which is a fact, a reality, whatever my view of it as a rabbi might be, but the risk of irreversibly scrambling genealogies, questions of legal and social status (the child - as - subject becoming child - as - object), and identities — a confusion that would be harmful to society as a whole and that would lose sight of the general interest in seeking the advantage of a tiny minority.

He is referring to the question of human - animal hybrid embryos; and he does not, it will be noted, utter anything so obvious as «it is profoundly wrong»:

Hiya — just to get back to all your questions — not sure which article you're referring to, but try searching «blender» or «food processor» on the blog and see if you do!

Just a clarifying question: when you say full - fat, are you referring to not using light coconut milk, but just a normal can of coconut milk?

Btw, since it doesn't seem like the question has been answered, neutral oil refers to oils that have little to no taste.

Just a question: Your ingredient list doesn't match the directions of preparation: Referring to adding the buttermilk when none is listed, may be confusing, thanks!

Not sure I'm following you here — do you want to alter this recipe to include those ingredients or does your question refer to another stuffed chicken recipe on my site.

Moreover, during the early 1800s a spice was exported in large quantities from Mexico and was referred to geographically as «tabasco,» even though the spice in question was obtained from the berry of the myrtle tree (indigenous to the Tabasco region of Mexico), and not made from capsicum peppers at all.

Then I could refer such questions to that article.Jando from AustraliaJando: Overwintering depends on whether or not you...

Without naming names, the 52 - year - old made it known who he was referring to and it wouldn't be surprising to see him under hot bother again from the Football Association if he's deemed to be calling their integrity into question.

I was only referring to downsides for the individual in question, not situations like driving on a given substance, which I misread the first time.

In passing may I refer to the maddening habit of sports columnists, not to mention many a columnist in other pages of the papers, misusing the term «begging the question».

these comments were from the official club's website, there is no way that these are some kind of speculation or rumours as these pundits from Goal.com used to do.And as far as I can see, its the club itself who do nt want to see Toure go.Last time I checked Goal.com they also said that Walcott isnt happy and could be sold for 400.000 Pounds, as well as Eboue's speculation which has been mentionned early today.SF, can you please refer me to some of those sites or blogs that you have seen this updates of Toure's concern???? I am really curious abt that coz when I left my computer yesterday, I was very confident that the threat of Toure leaving is completely out of question and sight from all fans.

Now when I take my sick kid to the doctor I don't have to remember every little thing because I have an app to refer to and can answer their questions easily!

I referred to tax - funded benefits in my question, but this does not provide an answer to why the US draw different conclusions from this than the rest of the world (who also provide such benefits to expats, even if they don't pay taxes on foreign income).

He told me the lease in question is located in the Delaware River Basin and would not have been impacted by the fracking resolution, which only referred to a ban in New York.

Question 2 The OP doesn't specify which parts of the Geneva Conventions he is referring to, but I believe it is in regards to the treatment of suspected terrorists, also known as «enemy combatants.»

My question is to what extent is Israel (mainland not referring to occupied disputed territories) a liberal democracy?

The question should at least explain what are Clinton or Wray's positions about China and how they differ with their previous stands, and not only refer to links.

Spitzer twice referred to Cuomo as «presumably» the next governor, but said he won't endorse the AG until after he answers questions about issues like health care and charter schools and» shows the fortitude to answer them the right way.»