Sentences with phrase «not religion basis»

People start looking for partner at their own basis and wish not religion basis.

Christianity is not a religion based on somebody's imagination.

Note that technically the restrictions are location based and not religion based.

Not exact matches

«Those statements are definitely relevant, because there's a longstanding doctrine that there can be laws or executive orders that on their face don't discriminative on the basis of race or religion but that is their motive — and if that is their motive, they can be struck down,» Ilya Somin, a George Mason University law professor, told CNN on Tuesday.

We also tend to make generalizations about a person's individual contribution to a project based on how we feel about a group the person belongs to: a team, a company, or — even if we don't realize it — their ethnicity, religion or disability.

Wynne went on to say that the Province has changed and that «I do not believe the people of Ontario judge their leaders on the basis of race, sexual orientation, colour or religion.

The spokesperson said the agency can't comment on open investigations or particular travelers, but that it «firmly denies any accusations of racially profiling travelers based on nationality, race, sex, religion, faith, or spiritual beliefs.»

Of course, you can not discriminate based on the religion itself.

This comes just nine months after the Labor Department sued Google for not handing over 19 years of pay data on 21,000 Google employees for a routine audit into the company's pay methods, as part of that department's attempt to show whether Google's hiring discriminates on the basis of race, religion, gender, or other factors.

And if contract workers lose a contract or are otherwise discriminated against on the basis of age, religion, sex, disability status, or national origin, they have little recourse.15 Moreover, discretionary company - provided benefits — such as paid leave and retirement contributions — are not typically available to independent contractors.

In the open letter, Engstrom and Franklin write, «Limits on the movement immigrants — including lawful visa holders — into the U.S. based on their nationality or religion not only seed fear and uncertainty for our friends, families, and co-workers, but are also antithetical to American values and sends the message that the U.S. is no longer open for innovation.

In a statement, Spotify said that it did not tolerate content that «favors hatred» or incites violence on the basis of race, religion or sexuality, and added that it «takes immediate action to remove any such material as soon as it has been brought to our attention.»

The Finance Authority of Maine (FAME) does not discriminate in the administration of any of its programs or in its employment practices on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, gender, religion, physical or mental disability, political affiliation, marital status or sexual orientation.

We also will not show interest - based ads based on sensitive information or interest categories, such as those based on, race, religion, sexual orientation, health, or sensitive financial categories, without your opt - in consent.

When it comes to Al - Qaida, we don't seem to understand that it is based on the individuals, willingness to die for a caused that is maid all the stronger when it is steeped in religion with the promise of not only Great reward in heaven but also great rewards to the family here on earth.

The women who started the movement agreed that when it came to being a victim of rape, there was no distinction between religion or ethnicity: If a man came into a roomful of women with the intention to rape, he would not discriminate among his victims based on religious or ethnic grounds.

SunTrust does not discriminate against individuals on the basis of race, creed, color, gender, religion, national origin, age, disability, veteran status, pregnancy, marital status, citizenship status, sexual orientation, gender identity, genetic information, or any other classification protected by applicable laws.

The problem with Islam is that the religion and the theocracy they establish is based on a book that tells them to kill anyone who does not agree to become a Muslim.

Haven't we been at war for the last 10 years with people who act based on what their religion told them to do?

(not that i am specifically against religion either, but some their ideas / teachings based purely on faith are too unquestionable.)

Science is not religion, it is a method of enquiry based upon direct observation which transcends religion (the laws of physics are the same for everyone, no matter how you name God or even whether you believe).

You can't ban a group on the basis of religion.

This prejudice favouring traditional religions demonstrates a degree of imperial ethics... Sometimes, while not based on established jurisprudence, the perception is that we are prepared to challenge in the courts a newer religion with different belief structures but are prepared to accept the more established religions.

Most Atheists would argue that they do not fall into either of those definitions, as they reject religion and they generally demand that belief is based on proof.

Anything to do with Billy Graham should not include religion, based from past history.

That doesn't mean that there isn't a god, or that people can't lead good and full lives based on religion

All this boils down to is you are trying to tell American's that they can not have a certain medical procedure because you don't like it based on your religion.

In my own personal belief, the army is a christian majority, and only gives face to other religions that aren't Christ based.

It may be faith based but its clearly not a religion.

what you believe is not «biblically based», it's indoctrination about ideas that came from warping and exagerating ideas that existed in «pagan» (not actually the correct term but good for this purpose) mythologies, and the evil imaginations of men like Dante and those who desired to see those they considered inferior in doctrine, belief, religion or culture in torture.

For him, to find a basis for a peaceful and tolerant coexistence of people of different backgrounds, one had to turn either to a type of Christianity that was reduced to charitable works or to a natural religion and morality that did not invoke any supernatural revelation.

(1) Churches on base of all religions are funded by the government... yes, your tax dollars are paying for me to be able to enjoy whichever religious service of the 10 denominations that my small base has (not Fort Bragg)... and if I want to be Christian one day, switch to Muslim another, or Jewish another then your tax dollars are still going to pay for me to have freedom of choosing my religion on base.

@DaLe, how can you say no one commits acts of violence in the name of their religion when there are plenty of examples of Muslims not only shouting «Allahu Akbar» when committing their violent acts but also justifying those actions based on Islamic texts?

So how do you go from that reasoning to «Since it wasn't accidental then it must have been this ancient male diety named (fill in blank depending on religion) who loves me and knows me and cares for me and wants me to perform rituals that have nothing to do with morality like prayer, not eating certain things, sabaath and many more just because he said so, even though we have no record of him saying anything, just records of humans who wrote things down that they claim he said, but I want to believe it all so badly I will base my beliefs on no other evidence than «it just can't be accident».

Science should and must remain science, not become a mean by which this or that religion proves its basis for faith.

There is much that could be said about this, but I will stick with one thing, based on discussion at about the 2 minute mark: When atheists insist that atheism does not drive behavior, and then then campaign on behalf of atheism, ridicule religion and religious believers in the name of atheism, seek to change laws in favor of their atheistic positions, recommend the extermination of religion, and practice falsehoods like Dawkins's in support of atheism, they prove that their atheism drives their behavior and that their premise is false, disingenuous, and (as far as I can tell) useless for anything but giving atheism rhetorical cover from being implicated in atheists» atrocities.

Same thing Kennedy said then applies now, as long as he doesn't make his decision based on religious imperatives his religion is irrelevant.

The danger is not just that religion and religiously based opinions are being privatized, as Franck points out.

And the Church teaches that the freedom of religion may not be infringed by government mandates that persons act contrary to what their consciences tell them about the truth of such things as the sanctity of life, the dignity of marriage, and the reality of sex as the basis of «gender.»

Faith, being belief that isn't based on evidence, is the principal vice of any religion.

This distaste for religion, is not based on any group of people.

Nii Nii the stupid guy... if he was not so stupid he would know that ATHEISM is not defined as religion but he is too stupid to believe anything based in reality.

I know you aren't a fool, so I am just trying to explain my take on all this based on my haphazard legal education and insistence upon the rule of law over that of religion.

We'll never know his true motive; I learned many years ago not to take at face value excuses based on religion.

Isn't selecting a spouse on the basis of religion as invidious as doing so on the basis of race?

Our country was founded on the basis of freedom of religion, the right to believe (or not).

Deciding when a «life» starts is fine as long as it is not legally based on religion, therin lies the issue.

They can't fund religious - oriented greek societies in any way, and they can't have policies which support selection for funded student organizations based on religion.

As far as other religions it has been scientifically proven that all religions are based off Christianity but most religion broke him into many gods because they could not fathom one person doing all he does..

you sir are practicing a religion one that means so much to you that you use it as your online name also please show me where I call you a fool or is telling someone not to make a fool of themself the same as calling them a fool which would mean you are very religious as far as Colin he said nothing that related to the debate I was in with you... we are talking about Atheism as a religious view not debating the existence of God now look over the definitions I have shown you and please explain how Atheism does not fit into the said definitions And you claim that evolution is true so the burden of proof falls in your lap as it is the base of your religion.