Sentences with phrase «not right body»

Not exact matches

That's because the meal on the right doesn't provide what Whitehead calls «balance» — essentially the right mix of proteins, complex carbohydrates, and fruits and vegetables that your body needs to be properly fueled in the long term.

However, our noses don't always get it right, and sometimes our body mistakes harmless things as an attack.

This is the root of sexual violence: The idea that women aren't autonomous human beings with the right and ability to say yes to sexual interactions we want and no to those we don't, but that we're receptacles for male sexual desire, that our bodies are up for grabs (literally, in this case).

«Sometimes your body will react badly to extra stress — if you haven't slept enough the night before, if you haven't eaten the right food all day, or if you are generally feeling stressed out at work.

Not only do they make sense for a bustling, busy office by reducing sharp corners and providing closer body - to - keyboard comfort, they also offer a little more enclosed privacy when arranged the right way.

So now, not only do I get the right kind and right dose of fat, but I'm also adding protein to help build muscle and keep my body from consuming my muscle protein for energy.

«A» couldn't return to Rhiannon right away because they woke up in a hospital patient's body.

«We will not sit by as they decide what rights and freedoms we should have over our own bodies, our lives, and our futures.»

When we were exhuming the body, there were all the scientists and anthropologists there, helicopters were circling overhead, and it struck me right between the eyes: This isn't some Indiana Jones quest.

Your body's just been booted down for hours — you can't expect it to be warmed up, energized, and raring to go right away.

The frame is also designed with a no - pinching body so it will not disrupt you or be at risk of harm when used right.

You might not have the flexibility to do everything at the right time for you, but try listening to your body clock as much as you can.

Keywords do not necessarily have to appear right next to each other in the title or body of the release to matter to search engines.

No, I think he meant the belief that suffering is a «kiss from Jesus», that women can't make decisions about their own bodies, that the RCC's wealth, power and reputation are more important than doing what is right, and that children are there for the pleasure of the clergy.

Also, morality is not external (if byexternal that you mean something that you can know is right or wrong has to be determined by a larger body or set of policies created by someone else many years ago to be official), and morality does not necessarily flow from religion (plenty of Catholic priests, Islamic Imams, Protestant preachers wave their hands high in the air in the afternoon, at praise time, and when the lights go down they crawl on their bellies, and hands and knees like snakes and dogs).

Do you have the right to tell others what they can and can not do with their bodies, and why do you think you have this authority?

It is her body and if she doesn't want to gestate, she has the unfettered right, at least in the early months, to terminate the pregnancy.

In America we have freedom, rights and choices, one choice and right is to allow woman to have the choice to abort, adopt, or give birth if they want to, no one has the right to tell woman what they can or can't do with their bodies.

«Once again, expressions of Christian faith that honor the rights of women to choose their own health care options and what happens to their bodies are not seen or heard,» wrote the Rev. Barbara Kershner Daniel, who pastors the Evangelical Reformed United Church of Christ of Frederick, Maryland, in a message that she circulated via email.

We're not the ones whining that our non-existent holy books rules are not being paid attention to - LGBT rights violates your beliefs; women having control over their bodies violates your rights - I care that you don't get to stop that stuff.

Woman has a right to choose an abortion But Woman do not have a right to display that same body in public Woman do not have a right to sell that same body

Two questions, if a woman has a right to there body... Why can they not run through the streets naked and restrained her body image by clothes?

The issue isn't and has never been one of women's rights or the right to do with your body what you want.

A person who accepts someone's right to conduct business and smoke weed unmolested by the government will not have the passion to fight against a woman's right to control her own body.

His body is not gross matter imprisoning him; it pulsates, breathes, dwells securely and participates fully in the overflowing joy and delight he feels in God's right hand forever.

To hold that same - sex marriage is part of the fundamental right to marry, or necessary for giving LGBT people the equal protection of the laws, the Court implicitly made a number of other assumptions: that one - flesh union has no distinct value in itself, only the feelings fostered by any kind of consensual sex; that there is nothing special about knowing the love of the two people whose union gave you life, whose bodies gave you yours, so long as you have two sources of care and support; that what children need is parenting in some disembodied sense, and not mothering and fathering.

Maybe God doesn't want to be famous, maybe God yearns to bring the dead to life, justice to the oppressed, wholeness to your body and mind and soul, and bring life more abundant, in the seeds of a right - now life.

It would mean that the spiritual soul, which is not a material energy and which can not evolve, would inherit a body already made to obey its natural seasons of purpose and right use.

This comes right back to a bunch of men wanting to tell women what they can and can not do with their bodies.

Not for every body and you may not be for every body either I don't blame you See: right there — Homo - PhobNot for every body and you may not be for every body either I don't blame you See: right there — Homo - Phobnot be for every body either I don't blame you See: right there — Homo - Phobic.

Release a list of all the Archbishops, Bishops, and priests that molested their congregation, with a list of who was molested, as well as complete signed apologies from all the resulting offenders, and a signed confession by the Pope that these people will be charged in a criminal court for these crimes and will not ever be allowed to preach the word of God in a Catholic church, and then, MAYBE, I'll think you have a right to tell your followers they can't do with their bodies as they please.

Finkelstein's latest work, however, adds a totally original element by criticizing the activities of the WJC and other Jewish bodies, criticism which one need not be on the left (or the right) to accept.

I find it repulsive that priests can do whatever they want to some kid's body, but a grown woman doesn't have that same right.

He may also be faced with incomprehension and hostility when he tries to persuade the school not to support «Red Nose Day» or «Jeans for Genes»; when he suggests that asking pupils to stand at the front of the class and shout out the names of intimate body parts is an invasion of their modesty; when he objects to the non-Catholic geography teacher's presentation of solutions for over-population, the «gay rights» agenda seeping in through text books, the chaplaincyco - ordinator's failure to get abortion agency leaflets removed from the library, or the school nurse's distribution of cards with information on how to get the morning - after pill.

For many nominal Catholics may not live a Christian life at all and may be quite uninterested in the Church, but might nevertheless claim their right to vote for electoral bodies precisely in order to work against the interests of the Church.

I'm left with the nagging fear that the old cranks have been right all along, and with the worse fear that I'm the Gnostic, fantasizing that I can shield my self from my body's failings, soldier through, pretend it's not happening.

Heard few crying over why not being able to penetrate to some countries internet for hearing them out while practicing their rights of expression and speech and today I am here to do what i have been told to do I am told to stop, because I allowed my self to intervene commenting on your affairs, but every body else at yours has the right to mingle with our affairs as Arabs or Muslims?

When I talk to my good friend who is a very conservative Catholic who views taking communion as sacred and every crumb is representative of Christ's body and not one crumb will drop... then compare it to how we do it at church... everyone ripping bread from the same loaf, crumbs everywhere, kids spilling the «wine»... does it really matter... is one more right than the other... one upholds church law on how communion will be performed versus our laid back version.

The classic pastor's greeting line, «We're just one big happy family» ranks right up there with «I haven't got a racist bone in my body,» «I don't like yes - men,» and «We've got to get together for lunch — real soon» as classic patent insincerities.

Don't want an abortion, don't have one but don't think your personal belief trumps the laws that you must bide by in this world and please don't think they deserve respect when obviously they are being use to step on other peoples rights to freedom over their own body.

Prayer for health should not begin when sickness strikes, but should pervade one's total life in terms of prayer for a right use of the body and the right dedication of its powers to God's service.

I care about the life people like you are attempting to force in to this world, you care about what appeases your god - big difference when you really don't care or consider the child only what your imaginary friend god wants and yet your god cause abortions all the time... you care about a clump of cells, not the actual life of the child and that's much worse than me supporting the rights of a woman to have control over her body, especially if the clump of cells couldn't survive outside of the host.

Wayne C. Lusvardi is right to underscore that certain things» unborn children, for instance, or body parts, or drugs» shouldn't be subject to the logic of choice that prevails in a free market.

There's all this rhetoric in Australia about prostitution, about how it's a woman's right, full of liberated women who just can't wait to sell their bodies.

Even when it's a matter of life and death, our laws do not compel someone to do something with her body against her will without infringing on the rights guaranteed by the Const i tuition.

I am not convinced that... surgical interventions are necessarily the right response for people... The reason I'm unsure is that if someone's gender identity does not match with their physical body, our culture treats our gender identity as what really defines us, rather than our physical sex.

The strongest argument in favor of legalized abortion is not that a woman should have the right to choose what to do with her own body.

In matters of some significance, such as congressional «representation» of religious groups, the enormous and disproportionate visibility of the oldline bodies continues (in 1984, 67 Episcopalians, one Pentecostal); the «losses» have been to Roman Catholic and Jewish representation, not noticeably to right - wing or even «evangelical» Protestantism (Albert Menendez, «The Changing Religious Profile of Congress,» Church and State [January 1983], pp. 9 - 12; Christianity Today, «Members of Congress Hold Ties to 21 Religious Groups» [January 18, 19851, pp. 61 -64) Even in the membership sweepstakes it appears that the NCC bodies may do reasonably well in the 1980s.

Do not they have the right to choose what happens to their body?

Or it could be that the men don't necessarily support abortion, they support an individual's right to control their own lives and bodies, and they support the woman in their lives who make these difficult decisions.