Sentences with phrase «not ruminants»

Camels are not ruminants but are Tylopodes and have three stomachs, but they do ruminate.

We are not ruminants with many stomachs that can ferment our grains to break down anti-nutrients and extract all the vitamins and minerals.

Humans are not ruminants, humans have digestive systems like those of cats and dogs.

Humans are not ruminants.

So, if a LITERAL reading of the bible is intellectually defensible, could you please intellectually defend Leviticus: — bats are a form of bird (no, they are mammals)-- insects go around on all fours (no, they have 6 legs)-- hares chew their cud (no, they are rodents, not ruminants)

Horses are not ruminants, rather monogastric (one stomach) animals; and deer do not generally eat grass rather leaves and fruit.

14:7) The above represents one of the most popular objections in the skeptics book, and this is their take on the meaning: Hares (or some say rabbits, but «hare» is what is in mind here) are not ruminants; they practice refection.

The camel is not a ruminant, but a Tylopode, and has different proteins in its milk.

Not exact matches

The emission of methane by ruminants is probably not affected by organic production.

Cows are naturally grass - eating ruminants and their stomachs aren't designed to eat corn.

«We agree with the FCRN report that ruminants can not reverse climate change, even if they are grass - fed,» says Michael Lee, Head of North Wyke and Professor of Sustainable Livestock Systems at Bristol Veterinary School.

BSE emerged as a result of what originally looked like an ingenious use of beef by - products: feeding processed ground cow to ruminants, which are herbivores, not carnivores.

And even under the best of conditions, carbon sequestration is not at levels high enough to counteract the ruminants» own emissions, the report says.

I don't see any reason in the logic for allowing domestic ruminant populations to gradually decline over decades.

There are clear differences in the digestion of ruminants from other mammals, since they not only digest the plant matter but also the bacteria that live in the gut and digest the cellulose.

It is not yet technically possible to determine whether an extinct animal chewed the cud from stable isotope analysis, although this approach may someday prove to be useful in determining whether a particular fossil indicates a ruminant digestion.

Unlike the gut of a gorilla or a ruminant such as a cow, the human gut is simply not large enough to turn vegetable matters into fatty acids at an adequate rate for ideal metabolic and nervous system health.

Human anatomy is simply not designed to digest too much cellulose, the way plant - focused animals are, animals such as ruminants (cows, goats, etc.) and gorillas.

Anyway, keep living like a ruminant, I personally don't mind and judge, but I will keep eating what humans are best adapted to — an omnivore diet!

Ruminant animals like cows and sheep convert K1 into K2 in their stomachs, but humans don't convert K1 to K2 as efficiently.

Also, organic dairy products have usually come from cows that have been grass - fed (as opposed to GMO - grains, which is not natural for these big ruminants).

A lot of people simply do not realize most animal species evolved to get most of their caloric energy needs from fat, even ruminants actually receive their nutrition and calories from the fatty acids generated by the bacteria in their rumen consuming the plant matter.

It is clear from the anthropological record, evolutionary biology and basic anatomy humans are acid digesters, not hindgut or ruminant digesters and thus evolved to be fat burning animals which are uniquely capable of metabolizing sugar on those seasonal occasions where fruits, berries or tubers were ripe.

The Omega 3 fatty acid found in plant is ALA (Alpha Linoleic Acid) and not the Long - chain omega - 3 fatty acids EPA (eicosapentaenoic acid) and DHA (docosahexaenoic acid) found abundantly in fish, shellfish and grass / range fed ruminants (cattle, sheep, goats, deer, elk, antelope etc.).

For starters, ruminants have a different metabolic physiology than humans and I am not well versed enough in veterinary medicine to really answer your questions in livestock but I can answer your latter ones that regard humans.

Research on it in the past has been on cattle (ruminants) and is not exactly able to be extrapolated to humans due to digestive and fermentation differences in both species metabolisms.

And the same goes for ruminants we may have not mentioned (e.g. buffalo), and any other such examples you may find in the fruits and vegetables.

Eating freely a wide range of good human foods is the way to go imo... fruits, vegetables, some soaked nuts / seeds (not to many) lots of fish, and ruminant meats, not too much chicken.

At the top of the list is fish oil, followed by n - 3 eggs, grass - fed butter, and the fat of grass - fed ruminants.

Chicken liver has moderately - high amounts of iron, and, unlike ruminant liver, is not extremely high in copper, so we add 0.75 lbs.

This product is designed for dog use only, so do not attempt feeding your household, cattle or other ruminants with it.

Presently we do not offer ruminant animal care at our Hockessin location.

That's primarily because the copper amounts in ruminant livers, especially beef, are 10 times the copper amounts in poultry livers, and some recipe and commercial diet makers don't know that.

Presently we do not offer ruminant animal care at our Talleyville location.

I gather that there is speculation that natural gas extraction and distribution is the likely culprit, but my understanding is that Miller et al's methodology doesn't allow them to distinguish between potential sources (e.g. leakage at a wellhead vs. ruminant livestock).

Agricultural emission, from rice farming and ruminant animals, is not so easy to quantify either, but we'll leave a description of that to the reader's imagination.

As a result, a stable population of ruminants need not increase the stock of atmospheric methane over time (or the associating forcing).

Only half the formula for animal - sourced methane was considered because declines in bison, elephant, and many other ruminant populations, though regrettable, were not deducted.

Ruminants such as sheep, cattle, and goats can not make long - termadditions to the gases in the atmosphere — they just recycle atmospheric carbon and nitrogen nutrients in a cycle - of - life that has operated for millennia.

Farmers won't produce more cellulose than their ruminants need unless there is a cellulose to ethanol plant buying.

While this process enables ruminants to digest fibrous grasses that humans can't convert into digestible form, it also contributes to livestock's impact on climate change.

Ruminants such as sheep, cattle and goats can not make long - term additions to the gases in the atmosphere — they just recycle atmospheric carbon and nitrogen nutrients in a cycle - of - life that has operated for millennia.

Methane doesn't just emerge from leaks from oil and gas operations — it is also belched by ruminants (i.e., cows) and emerges from wetlands, landfills and much more.