Sentences with phrase «not save the soul»

(Somebody, perhaps his preacher, needs to remind varney that going to church doesn't save your soul, it's what you do when you leave the service that makes the difference)

She can't save your soul.

Satan can not save your soul.

down formula for the Lone Self, it is an aesthetically shapely scheme which may suffice the eye but does not save the soul.

It is not about kind deeds, which can not save the soul.

If we do not get rid of sin and if we fail to follow Scripture, then we will not save our souls.

Man don't save souls, Jesus does.

Pastor Adeboye can not save souls and that would include his own.

The number of quotes we all now use that came from that Ogilvy book are incredible: «Pay people peanuts and you get monkeys» «Don't keep a dog and bark yourself» «Leaders grab nettles» «Hire people who are btter than you are» «You can't save souls in an empty church»

Not exact matches

Mormons can get saved only by trusting in the atoning death of the Divine Savior Jesus on the cross for the remission of sins, not in their good works, for humanity's good works can not redeem a single soul.

Doing that in every flight trip I take make me at rest that if any thing happened on the way at least then if died will not go waste but would face the mercy of God on my soul... Because there only in the upper heavens or mid oceans you have nothing but the mercy of God and nothing in hand to relay upon trying to save self...!!!

who's to say that my soul wasn't already «saved»?

I still don't think that I could ever be happy with my «saved» soul in heaven while my family (who may have been good people, just didn't believe Jesus was God) rotted in hell to be tortured forever.

But it's not like I'm suddenly a mormon because you sprinkle a little water on some living Mormon who for some reason wants my soul to be saved and decides to stand in for me.

to save our mortal lives at the cost of our souls can not tolerate easy morality that would save our nation at the cost of our innocence.

We atheists try to help people not kill them to save their souls, WHAT IS A SOUL AND WHAT IS A HOLY GHOST.

When they jump in to start saving your soul they will ask why wouldn't it make sense since Christianity is «the one and only truth and pathway to salvation».

Beeb, as «nice» as your ideals are, not everyoe would benefit from a death bed «soul saving» marathon.

It's nice to know I won't be berated with «accept jesus and save your soul» as I pass into the next life.

Can't God save these souls without the assistance of some third party?

My soul is just fine and please don't confuse hatred with dissapointment in a God that never returned to save the innocent.

NOW HE KNOWS that the One he deemed not worth knowing was the ONLY One who could have saved his pityful soul.

You should be trying to save souls!!!! What are you there for, to assure that even in their final hour when God's mercy is greatest, that they not convert and go to him?

It was created to save Rome not souls.

If there are things about us that stain our soul, sins we cling to, sins we may think «are not all that bad» will be tested by fire as gold is purified by fire... these bad «deeds» will burn though we ourselves may be saved.

if not, i pray for you and i will set up missionaries all across the globe to make sure that the rest of the lost souls also find Santa Clause within them... let's first begin with donations; only from your heart and soul, and because of your kindness... no other agenda... Santa Clause loves you my dear... he has touched my heart so I know he exists... and I want you to believe in Santa Clause as well so you don't have to burn in hell... i want to save your soul my child... come pray with me...

Join me and lets celebrate him, he is worthy BEWARE: LUV disappoints, SARS is dangerous, AIDS is real, BOOZE intoxicates, DRUGS kill... but JESUS saves... don't delete spread info 2 every living soul in your list.

In the interview, the Pope appeared to endorse not universalism (the idea that everyone will be saved) but annihilationism (the belief that unsaved souls will perish in hell, rather than being tormented forever).

Yall need to find a new tag line this thinking for ones self just do nt work, To Chose to accept Christ as your Savior is a very personnel choice, It has to come from you and you alone, A silent request for Christ to save your soul, No one made that decision for me.

And saving BILLIONS of souls isn't important.

The great drama will end, not with «saved souls» being snatched up into heaven, but with the New Jerusalem coming down from heaven to earth.

People that do nt know the Lord would think that way, read the bible then u will know what God is about, God cares about your soul in the name of Jesus, he wants to save your soul from hell if u would surrender your life to him and live for him, he is not concern about no football game or worldly things, he wants u to come to him and get saved thats what God is about, learn of him read the Holy Bible.

Part of Christianity, latent in AA or not, is an even passive desire to save other souls.

Though the Bible occasionally speaks of the death of the soul (cf. Ezek 18:4; Matt 16:25 - 26; Jas 1:21; 5:20; 1 Pet 1:9) these texts do not refer to the death of the soul itself, but to the separation of the body from the soul, which results in physical death (see the following articles by Bob Wilkin: «Soul Talk, Soul Food, and Soul Salvation»; «Saving the Soul of a Fellow Christian (James 5:29 - 20)»; «Saving Your Soul By Doing Good (James 1:21)»; «Gaining by Losing (Matthew 16:24 - 28)»; «Suffering which results in Abundant Life (1 Peter 1:9)&raqusoul (cf. Ezek 18:4; Matt 16:25 - 26; Jas 1:21; 5:20; 1 Pet 1:9) these texts do not refer to the death of the soul itself, but to the separation of the body from the soul, which results in physical death (see the following articles by Bob Wilkin: «Soul Talk, Soul Food, and Soul Salvation»; «Saving the Soul of a Fellow Christian (James 5:29 - 20)»; «Saving Your Soul By Doing Good (James 1:21)»; «Gaining by Losing (Matthew 16:24 - 28)»; «Suffering which results in Abundant Life (1 Peter 1:9)&raqusoul itself, but to the separation of the body from the soul, which results in physical death (see the following articles by Bob Wilkin: «Soul Talk, Soul Food, and Soul Salvation»; «Saving the Soul of a Fellow Christian (James 5:29 - 20)»; «Saving Your Soul By Doing Good (James 1:21)»; «Gaining by Losing (Matthew 16:24 - 28)»; «Suffering which results in Abundant Life (1 Peter 1:9)&raqusoul, which results in physical death (see the following articles by Bob Wilkin: «Soul Talk, Soul Food, and Soul Salvation»; «Saving the Soul of a Fellow Christian (James 5:29 - 20)»; «Saving Your Soul By Doing Good (James 1:21)»; «Gaining by Losing (Matthew 16:24 - 28)»; «Suffering which results in Abundant Life (1 Peter 1:9)&raquSoul Talk, Soul Food, and Soul Salvation»; «Saving the Soul of a Fellow Christian (James 5:29 - 20)»; «Saving Your Soul By Doing Good (James 1:21)»; «Gaining by Losing (Matthew 16:24 - 28)»; «Suffering which results in Abundant Life (1 Peter 1:9)&raquSoul Food, and Soul Salvation»; «Saving the Soul of a Fellow Christian (James 5:29 - 20)»; «Saving Your Soul By Doing Good (James 1:21)»; «Gaining by Losing (Matthew 16:24 - 28)»; «Suffering which results in Abundant Life (1 Peter 1:9)&raquSoul Salvation»; «Saving the Soul of a Fellow Christian (James 5:29 - 20)»; «Saving Your Soul By Doing Good (James 1:21)»; «Gaining by Losing (Matthew 16:24 - 28)»; «Suffering which results in Abundant Life (1 Peter 1:9)&raquSoul of a Fellow Christian (James 5:29 - 20)»; «Saving Your Soul By Doing Good (James 1:21)»; «Gaining by Losing (Matthew 16:24 - 28)»; «Suffering which results in Abundant Life (1 Peter 1:9)&raquSoul By Doing Good (James 1:21)»; «Gaining by Losing (Matthew 16:24 - 28)»; «Suffering which results in Abundant Life (1 Peter 1:9)»).

In a satirical magazine launched in 1721, the school's self - appointed jester sneered, «I have known a profligate debauchee chosen professor of moral philosophy; and a fellow, who never look'd upon the stars soberly in his life, professor of astronomy... and, not long ago, a famous gamester and stock - jobber was elected professor of divinity; so great, it seems, is the analogy between dusting of cushions, and shaking of elbows; or between squandering away of estates, and saving of souls!»

Or are «you» the new creation — the spirit - man, the image of the Last Adam, «he that does not sin» — which radiates outward and renews the old man, too, thus regenerating and saving the entire person flesh, soul and spirit?

I don't think God mind spending, say, $ 10,000 to save one soul in Dallas, if that's what it takes.

Not accepting that Jesus is the only one that can save your soul isn't something to scoff or be ignorant about.

For our Atheist and Agnostic friends who cling on «inaccuracies» in the Bible and the whole concept of trinity (which a lot of Christians struggle with)-- After reading those verses, you shouldn't take the Quran lightly in your endeavor to «save» those believing souls!

Such an extermination can be seen to be merciful by delivering the young into the hands of the Lord and possibly saving their souls by not giving them time to become «utterly sinful».

All I can say is «God save their soul» and God pray for them, because I surely can't.

We just were taught that any baby born and not baptized was going to «limbo» forever because their uncaring, heathen parents did not wish to save their souls committing them to the Catholic religion, and we prayed on a daily basis to those poor innocent children abandoned by their parents to eternity forever outside of heaven and the love of God.

she converted to Catholicism not Christianity and she says she converted because the morals fit her own not because she believes in the trinity... I believe the 10 commandments are a good set of guidelines for the world but I still do not believe in an all powerful being in charge of our «souls»... (if she had converted to Jehovahs witness she would not be saved since to them the holy spirit is a force not part of god thus its blasphemy)..

3:16 - 17, says we are God's temple to live in when we are on this earth (if we have asked Jesus to save us), and not to defile the temple or He will destroy us — cause the death of this body, our soul and spirit will still go to Heaven.

Joel — You should assume that your soul needs to be saved because you are in essence turning your back on the God that created you by saying — I don't believe in you and I don't need you — So when you die and you no longer have the amazing grace of God that keeps us all alive here on earth and provides for all of your needs (whether you acknowledge Him or not).

Heb 10:39 But we are not of them who draw back unto perdition; but of them that believe to the saving of the soul.

My understanding is that Jesus healed the sick not to provide health care to all as suggested (in my opinion that is just ignorant) but to perform miracles so that people would believe and save their souls for eternity.

Going to church to save your soul while hoarding your good fortune as your fellow man is suffereing, is not Christian and will not lead to your salvation.

The divine was driven out of nature not to turn nature into a technological instrument, but rather to make it the habitation of the devil; the religious «man» should shun it and flee from it in order to save «his» soul for a higher spiritual realm outside of and against the body and the visible, created world.

The only way to save your soul, which does not belong to you, is to accept Jesus and allow the Holy Ghost into your life.