Sentences with phrase «not see any evidence»

As recently as last May, Balsillie told attendees at the annual RIM conference he wasn't seeing evidence of the bring - your - own - device to work phenomenon.

A White House official blamed the light turnout on security that delayed attendees» entrance to the hall, but reporters on the scene said they didn't see evidence of that.

Gundlach added that he doesn't see evidence that an interest rate increase from the Federal Reserve will boost the dollar higher.

But we don't see evidence of a crumbling industry.»

Rob Knake, a former official who dealt with the issue under Obama, said he had not seen evidence in what was published to support that conclusion.

«We just don't know because we haven't seen any evidence,» said Mitchell.

I still don't see any evidence that an ongoing recession is recognized by economists or Wall Street analysts.

From what I have witnessed, the Foundation with Buterin at its helm, has exercised a great deal of rational thought in its decision making process, and I have not seen any evidence that it has chosen self - interest over the betterment of the Ethereum community as a whole.

But he said the company didn't see evidence that the economy hurt sales in the U.S. or China.

Though we don't see that evidence yet, and continued economic and valuation risks are likely to keep us hedged with put option coverage in any event, it's possible that we could cover a portion of our short call option hedges if we do see some firming of internals.

We haven't seen any evidence of anything that would possibly change that over the past month.»

I do not, as I have stated, have any love for the religious fundamentalists in this country, but I do not see any evidence that supports your claim.

I haven't seen evidence of it, or intellectual honesty, from you as of now.

It is a disgrace what happened to the Jews and other vulnerable minorities in WWII, I don't see evidence for a «miracle» anywhere.

I just don't see any evidence that one does.

If you don't SEE evidence of God it's because you are not looking or it is because you do not want to see.

Frankly, I don't see any evidence in heaven or hell.

I'm an Agnostic Atheist... I can't say with 100 % certainty that a god doesn't exist but I do not see the evidence supporting one and thus I do not believe in one.

I haven't seen evidence of either.

But since neither he nor his followers have so far not shown me a scrap of reliable evidences, and since I haven't seen any evidence that prayer is any more effective than wishing on a star, I doubt anything different is going to happen now.

I don't see any evidence that your belief that covering medications like birth control will bring us to our knees.

A silly example might be that because we don't see evidence of aliens on earth, they must have all left because the lack of alien evidence proves they were once here but must have left long ago.

If I didn't see evidence for God, I wouldn't believe either.

It's just that I have not seen evidence of such a situation.

I just don't see the evidence.

I haven't seen evidence that either of them has a navel.

There may be forms of existence that go beyond what we understand, but I have not seen any evidence of that despite hundreds of years of scientific tools and thousands of scientists available for the investigations of such claims and phenomena.

He explains: «It is very easy to slip into disdain for people who don't see the evidence for biological evolution or who want to impose their views on others in a coercive way, such as in Muslim majority countries.»

Atheists don't see evidence for your god or any other god, that is why we don't believe.

In response to your statement, «I haven't seen any evidence...» Right, and I can't provide you with that evidence.

Stating disbelief does not equate to anger, it merely means we are not seeing the evidence to support your claims.

For my part, when I look at the way events unfold in the world, I do not see any evidence there of the kind of divine activity called for by the Whiteheadian notion of God's consequent nature weaving itself across his primordial nature and then returning the «superjective» vision back to the world in an operative, effective manner through the shaping of subjective aims.

If this is a peaceful religion then I am not seeing evidence of it.

Although Darwin did not see any evidence for design in nature, we should keep in mind that any doubts Darwin may have had about religion were due to his reactions to the prevailing theology of providential design that dominated the culture of nineteenth - century Victorian England.

Like I said, I haven't seen any evidence that he was ever an atheist, simply that he came to despise Christianity.

You think that God doesn't exist b / c you say that you haven't seen evidence for God.

I didn't see any evidence in article that the bishop knew about it back then — am I missing something?

How about those that don't because they haven't seen any evidence of it?

Jesus spoke to His disciples specifically to buy the swords but I don't see any evidence He was advocating that everyone buy a sword.

I really don't see evidence in Paul's letters of an explicit emphasis that Jesus is the «return of YHWH» embodied and in person.

It is not believed because we do not see evidence of a worldwide flood and if there was one, the God who did it could not be a good God worthy of worship.

Akpom's a better dribbler, but as for a strikers instinct, I haven't seen any evidence as of yet.

All I can tell you is that I didn't see any evidence of weakness in his shoulders on tape.

Wenger had clearly not seen the evidence or he would have made more of it in his post match comments but he did say that he felt that Barca were wobbling a bit when Elneny did make it 1 - 1, so how much more would they have been feeling the nerves at 2 - 1 down and a man down?

But I do NOT see any evidence of «I will show them how good I am» mentality whatever.

You say Tottenham were once promoted despite not finishing in the promotion places but I can't see any evidence of that in the article.

I didn't see any evidence (1) actually connecting the former to the latter, (2) that the differences at birth are lasting, (3) that the purported diseases associated with the microbiome in adulthood are the same ones associated with c - section (the author cites obesity, but we know that those observational studies re: c - section and obesity are deeply flawed by confounding)(4) that the «microbiotic» benefit of vaginal birth exists regardless of maternal health and matenral microbiome.

I don't see evidence here that your daughter is not a securely attached child.

«Because we did not see evidence that SMA Follow - on Milk was the best alternative to breast milk once breastfeeding had stopped, or that it was superior to other follow - on milk, we concluded that the ads were misleading on these grounds.»

«Because we did not see evidence that SMA Follow - on Milk was the best alternative to breast milk once breastfeeding had stopped, or that it was superior to other follow - on milk, we concluded that the ads were misleading on these grounds,» said the ASA decision.