Sentences with phrase «not see her in pain»

Your sugar daddy UK can not see you in pain or trouble due to the lack of funds and this is one of the biggest advantage of dating one.

Happening very quickly and could not see her in pain, had already pre-arranged her ending as I could not watch her suffer.

Not exact matches

In the words of pricing strategist Tim Williams, «Clients don't care about the labor pains; they want to see the baby.»

We see this kind of widely - distributed but unaddressable pain in all kinds of political and community situations where the powers that be just can't or won't be bothered to try to build a solution and no individuals have enough of a stake (or enough at stake) to take on the larger problem for the common good.

They typically are not employed by any competitors and are seen as first - movers in building community around the pains and needs of your market.

And you've seen this in movies and television and hands tend to go where there's pain but this is not doing anything for us.

Religions incorporated and codified these basic social values and skills, and quickly learned to take credit for them — as if, without the religion, we would be doomed to not have them — although we see them in every human society, including hunter - gather tribes with no sense of gods as we understand them After many centuries of religious domination, enforced through pain of death, ostracization or other social sanctions, allowing religion to take credit, as well as failing to question other religious claims — has become a cultural habit.

of how you saw the face of God in the midst of fear or pain or joy and understood, really understood, Mary, not kneeling chastely beside a clean manger refraining from touching her babe, just moments after birth but instead, sore and exhilarated, weary and pressing a sleepy, wrinkled newborn to her breasts, treasuring every moment in her heart, marvelling not only at his very presence but at her own strength, how surrender and letting go is true work, tucking every sight and smell and smack of his lips into her own marrow.

Those who rise in leadership will see the temptations, the failings, the hurts, and may now choose a different path that doesn't introduce chaos and pain and suffering and alienation.

When the members of the congregation saw me in pain, they ministered to me — not from a distance, but as fellow travelers on the same patch of winding road.

Perhaps if you do not bring in pain and honesty, if you do not insist that your faith face pain squarely and honestly, that it be consistent with what your mind reasons and your heart feels and your eyes see, then perhaps faith is no problem for you.

Religion is a corporate and political structure bent on destroying things that help the most vulnerable in society with no guarantee of filling the void.They claim they can do it better, but since you can not make people be charitable and so many megachurches are focused on the bottom line, I don't see how this is going to pain out.

With respect, that you see removing a non-sentient embryo / fetus as comparable to the drowning / hacking to death of sentient children / infants suggests a lack of reasonable empathy (perhaps you don't have children and have never felt the helplessness in watching them suffer through pain?).

I'm an atheist but that doesn't prevent me from seeing a family in pain.

As we saw in Jesus» weeping at the tomb, God feels the pain of this world at a level we can't comprehend.

Nothing can make me happier than seeing those whom I love be happy and free from the pain that they had been under for the last 3.5 years... I do deeply regret that I hid from the public the abuse that I have lived with for most of our marriage and I ask your forgiveness... Three months ago Saeed told me things he demanded I must do to promote him in the eyes of the public that I simply could not do any longer.

I've seen in my marriage the pain of abortion, in my family the pain of a child who lived a handful of hours, of being in need and not even fellow Christians will assist in the smallest of essentials while unbelievers readily will.

Their boldness, firmness in the face of trial and how they answered to the judges in the name of their faith is very touching: Their well being is not the ultimate satisfaction but seeing others in painful situation caused them pain; they were willing to undergo difficulties and were totally oriented to others.

I truly believe that love can cover a multitude of sins — we have been involved in and with people who do fostering and have seen children who have experienced different kinds of abuse transformed through unconditional love and acceptance — sure the pain of what they have experienced may still be there but the unconditional love they receive transforms them from broken to not so much broken... if that makes sense?

We will argue that we do actually see Jesus upon the altar, but not that He physically winces in pain at thefraction.

Cobb's perspective strikes us as more naturalistic than substantively Christian, and it is not without its unacceptable moral costs; it not only relativizes all ethics to the Zeitgeist, it leads to a monism which produces great suffering and pain as can be seen in any number of poor lands around the world.

In fact, we might see Eid Al Ahda and Rosh Hashanah as far more advanced than the rest of the world precisely because these holidays call to consciousness this repressed but real tendency to pass on the pain that was done to us onto our children, and to remind us that the great spiritual leader Abraham was able to NOT DO IT, thereby giving us the message that we too need not sacrifice our children either actually by supporting the war machine or symbolically by passing onto them various other forms of hurt, oppression and cruelNOT DO IT, thereby giving us the message that we too need not sacrifice our children either actually by supporting the war machine or symbolically by passing onto them various other forms of hurt, oppression and cruelnot sacrifice our children either actually by supporting the war machine or symbolically by passing onto them various other forms of hurt, oppression and cruelty.

What I'm saying, in the example of Mother Theresa, is that it is blatantly obvious by the accounts of many who have seen these «hospitals» that the money she was given was not used to «ease the pain» of the dying poor.

Another problem is that when people calk for biblical literacy and then see pain and problems in the lives of others, they either think that a Bible verse will help the other person, OR that the other person wouldn't be having these problems if they had just known the Bible better.

I saw my funeral that day I know who didn't show to mourn My judgement was life in hell Pillars of pain and thorns My only friend's the goat With 666 between his horns Go to hell

Both saw that some human pain and torment are punitive, that some trouble is disciplinary was taken for granted, that in one way or another the cosmic process should not in the end be ethically unsatisfactory, that the whole experience of suffering remained mysterious, but that the climactic element in the New Testament's contribution to the understanding of suffering is to be found in its treatment of vicarious self - sacrifice.

It is amazing to see people grow over the years: not by becoming more successful, more pain - free or more cheerful (in a denial kind of way); but more resilient, patient and wise.

Marital lovemaking, not only mirrors this act of Jesus as our Lover, and we His Beloved, but also the creation of the world itself, when the Spirit of God (male) hovered over the dark waters (female) before the Spirit impregnated the Void with His life, and the Big Bang occurred (orgasm), evolving the Universe to what you see today, which is the creation yearning for the birth of the sons of God - truly the creation and earth and Universe is still in labour pains until the birth occurs!

But he who loves God has no need of tears, no need of admiration, in his love he forgets his suffering, yea, so completely has he forgotten it that afterwards there would not even be the least inkling of his pain if God Himself did not recall it, for God sees in secret and knows the distress and counts the tears and forgets nothing.

The only one who can not is Lucifer because he do not want to, God heart is not made of iron, if there are evil people alive in this world it is only because God want them to repent to, there are most evil people who as a children or teenager was sweet but because of another being became evil, Only God know what it did make them change or their pain but only one things is sure as God he did have the first seat to see all their pain and live, and to my point of view as a Father it is by no means lesser than the pain he did feel for them or them victimes, like a electric chair.

Alcoholics who are obviously in need of medical attention, who have the «shakes» or other withdrawal symptoms, and those who say that they feel «sick» (Mr. B., for example) will usually not resist seeing a physician to get relief from their pain.

In a democracy, this minority is easily outvoted, especially if populist politicians agitate the majority that either feels the pain or, minimally, does not see any tangible benefits as yet.

That church also aided an institution called Malcolm X University in Durham, North Carolina, at a terrific cost among many of its southern constituents who could not see the genuine pain and anguish beneath harsh black rhetoric.

Since we see people who have dedicated themselves to God, and for whom their gay sexual life is integrated into that decision and we see that their sexuality does not draw them away from church we must conclude that being and living gay is not a behavior in and of itself that produces pain to the neighbor and leads one away from God.

Can't wait for he or she to be here so I don't ever have to be preggers again (I was in the hospital the other day and the nurse said it has to be a boy it's such a pain in the - ss — we will see

What is more evil / selfish: A person who inadvertently causes harm to many around him / her because they are so wrapped up in self they can not see / do not care about the pain they cause or someone who purposefully chooses to cause harm to one person because it brings them pleasure?

Ely argues that what is evil for humanity is not evil for God because God sees pain, grief, and frustration «in such a way that they are valuable for him» (EWP 196).

He said: «As we see you, as we see this area with its constant memories of what has happened, we seek to share with you in a way that reminds you that you are not alone, that the pain you suffer is not considered passing but profound, and that the grief for the lost is something that will forever be inscribed by our memories in these very stones, stones that over so many centuries have seen so much violence, but have also seen the renewal of hope and the overcoming of evil.

Because nonhuman animals are not, by hypothesis, capable of developing such virtues, it is hard to see why a creator who is both omnipotent and benevolent would make them so susceptible to pain (insofar as warning devices are needed, omnipotence could have fashioned nonpainful ones, as pointed out in the book Catch 22).

Perhaps to glimpse heaven is not just to experience bliss, but to experience an attitude shift in which we begin to re-frame pain and hardship in our mind's eye to allow us to see it in a different light.

We had to put eye drops 5 times a days for years, yet eventually his eye got crystallized, he couldn't see anymore and he was in a lot of pain.

I've seen, and I don't to mention names, people do much smaller chile pepper feats, and they would be in severe pain for a long time afterwards with the cramping, and they couldn't hardly eat anything for dinner.

Both at the ground and on TV replays, I saw no contact between Monreal and Redmond, for which Redmond went down clutching his face for some reason, when if there was any contact, which there wasn't, that was the least likely part of his anatomy to receive it, but which resulted in their goal, and Jason Long also went down clutching his face, after slight contact on his heel, which I didn't even see in the stadium, but his reaction was over exaggerated, and clearly inconsistent with any pain that he might of incurred, only for him to quickly recover and go running back up the field, when no notice was being paid to him, and a corner was being awarded in Arsenal's favour.

goodness i can't believe it people will still defend him.You know something when Giroud misses many chances like at Monaco i did not criticize him even based on that you know why?its because he has always not been clinical.The only way a team can improve is by indentifying its problems and solving them.Arsenal has Giroud as the main cf and Welbeck as backup to him.Giroud has done well scoring some goals some too important but collectively he does more harm than good.Do not use moments to judge a player judge him based on content.Giroud does not excel in many games than he excels in games.As a main cf you need to be consistent.I see people here saying Giroud can not dribble he cant do this he cant do that but its a bit crazy to criticize him for that because every player has his own style.Giroud limitations as a player costs arsenal and will cost us a lot.Most importantly his poor finishing which has cost us several times.Not good enough.His style of play is ok for us but a striker who can take on players and run behind defences very well would make us very strong and also should be clinical.For Welbeck he needs to works on his finishing and composure by doing the basic things right.He rushes infront of goal too much.For now he is just above average.However he can excel if he works on improving.Giroud and Welbeck will always be a pain in arsenal's neck for most part.Some will call me stupid but hey at least i want to analyze the problem.People may support Giroud or Welbeck to lead the line next season but as the saying goes if you fool me once shame on you but if you fool me twice shame on me.Will you let Giroud and Welbeck fool you again?

I have seen changes in the world at my age, it's really true to call for a change but sometimes most changes come out of pain and doesn't bring bring intended results at the end of the tunnel, some most changes in different clubs have brought a quargmire situation of try and error in the managerial system.

Even getting a visa is a pain and travel expenses..., all in order to see him and he doesn't show up.

Bring in max allegri or diego simeone and then wagch thr players play for their life as they will not want to go in at full time knowing they will get skinned by the manager... wenger you lost ur style ur fire has been pissed on and it pains to see that your stubbornness has made you look like an absolute fool.

Then the weekend was spent not only losing to the Nationals, but also losing healthy players: In addition to Steven Matz and Seth Lugo, New York has recently added Lucas Duda and Wilmer Flores to the DL, saw Yoenis Cespedes miss the entire series against the Nats for his hamstring, and had Asdrubal Cabrera playing in spite of the pain in his own legIn addition to Steven Matz and Seth Lugo, New York has recently added Lucas Duda and Wilmer Flores to the DL, saw Yoenis Cespedes miss the entire series against the Nats for his hamstring, and had Asdrubal Cabrera playing in spite of the pain in his own legin spite of the pain in his own legin his own legs.

See, Aulas isn't that bad if he was fighting in your corner, he is just a pain in the arsenal when dealing against

Arsenal f.c is in the top 6 biggest clubs in europe and as such requires to be competing at all fronts not just competing for the F.A cup only.And with arsene wenger as manager that is just impossible.Fans are loosing wives cause of bets made, commiting murder when they are taunted about arsenal f.c loosing a game and also commiting suicide cause the pain is too unbearable.As you can see we are very passionate supporters so for every game its a matter of life and death.In a way an old dog can't be taught new tricks.