Sentences with phrase «not see the distinction»

I do not see a distinction there.

As for responding as a Christian or as a feminist, I personally don't see a distinction between the categories.

Scholars make distinctions where others do not see any distinctions.

I don't see this distinction... I don't accept it as a personal philosophy that the state may do something totally against the ethics of the state.

It is not as though God did not see the distinction between good and evil.

Didn't see that distinction in your write up above.

But I have not seen this distinction made clearly or definitively.

We honestly don't see any distinction, though, between what we do in our studios and what we do at the gallery.

You just haven't seen the distinction yet.

Not exact matches

Boies draws a careful distinction between daily fantasy sports and poker, though many people who play both don't see such a big difference.

Importantly, Siddall and his management team also wrote a new mission statement that emphasized the agency was about satisfying housing «needs,» not wants — a key distinction for an organization that long saw boosting homeownership as part of its mandate.

Second, let me say that, if we go with your second argument, then we could say that we agree that all distinctions are not the ideal, but just disagree on when we should see, want to see, or start to see those distinctions disappear.

I don't exactly disagree, though I think where we differ is that I see a distinction between receiving eternal life by faith and living as a follower of Jesus.

«We certainly can't build a Christology on that distinction,» Dr. MacDonald admitted, «but it does help us to see where Christology comes in.

The important discrimination, as he saw it, was not between material and immaterial — a distinction with which he never dealt — but between moral and immoral.

But when I read about and see young, emerging lives being destroyed by neglect, hunger, war and enraged parents, the distinction refocuses, and I say, «Life, real life, is being not only destroyed but twisted, deformed, «unholy» life is being created.»

This distinction is important because there is a difference, according to the Bible, between what we see and what God sees: «For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, says the Lord» (Isa.

The way of distinction, therefore, puts a positive valuation on the time - space continuum and, though it sees divine redemption as the remaking of history into something new, it can not conceive of divine - human interaction in other than historical terms which preserve the qualitative difference between God and man.

In any case, this distinction between the given and The Given is anticipated in the correspondence, as seen in Brightman's willingness to admit some degree of «faintness» in the given.40 The real difference may lie in Brightman's methodological desire to have the self (and what is given to and as the self, the shining present) clearly defined, while Hartshorne insists that not only the self, but also the given «is more or less vague,» and must be so.

If you can not see the difference then possibly you think they are all the same; there is a difference and the rest of us make the distinction.

In his reply to «Die Bauleute» Buber makes a distinction between revelation and the giving of the law which Rosenzweig has failed to make: «I do not believe that revelation is ever lawgiving, and in the fact that lawgiving always comes out of it, I see the fact of human opposition, the fact of man.»

Besides that, I can not see how any so called loving God can include mass distinction of life, his creations, over and over again in the history of our planet as we know it.

Let us never forget that precisely out of reverence for the Deity he was ignorant, that, so far as a pagan could be, he kept watch as a judge on the border between God / and man, watching out to see that the deep gulf of qualitative distinction be firmly fixed between them, between God / and man, that God / and man may not in a way, philosophice, poetice, etc., coalesce into one.

Father Oakes does not see the issue involved in the distinction between micro «and macroevolution.

2 will use the term «causal objectification'to indicate that I do not intend to deal with the type of objectification which Whitehead calls «presentational objectification» (see PR 58 / 91 for this distinction).

Finite spirit envisaged from the beginning and from its end, at least in the case of man, is «spirit in the world» or «cosmic spirit» and even with regard to the angels it will be appropriate for a Christian, and in the first place for a biblical, theology to see their distinction from mankind within this «cosmic spirituality» and not outside it or in contrast to it.

Are not our distinctions between nature and history shortsighted anti of limited validity when seen in this cosmic perspective?

In sum, in the argument that a PVS patient ought to be sustained as long as possible I see the unhappy fruits of the three technological seductions I described above: death by «starvation» has now become our fault, not nature's, if we omit treatment; the distinction between omission and commission is erased in the insistence that the stopping of artificial feeding is the same as killing the patient and, as too often happens, a new technology gets legitimated and routinized by an invocation of the sanctity of life.

To begin with, we must see that it is necessary to make distinctions within the Bible, for not everything in it has the same weight.

Pastor Dietrich Bonhoeffer clearly saw that «The distinction between life that is worth living and life that is not worth living must sooner or later destroy life itself.»

Not because the Bible is not the revealed word of God and not because the magisterium lacks the authority to teach the truth, but because the «truth» that the magisterium has the authority to teach is «truth for our salvation»; and although the above interpretation of the bara / asah distinction may conceivably be true, it is difficult to see how it can be a requirement for our salvatiNot because the Bible is not the revealed word of God and not because the magisterium lacks the authority to teach the truth, but because the «truth» that the magisterium has the authority to teach is «truth for our salvation»; and although the above interpretation of the bara / asah distinction may conceivably be true, it is difficult to see how it can be a requirement for our salvatinot the revealed word of God and not because the magisterium lacks the authority to teach the truth, but because the «truth» that the magisterium has the authority to teach is «truth for our salvation»; and although the above interpretation of the bara / asah distinction may conceivably be true, it is difficult to see how it can be a requirement for our salvatinot because the magisterium lacks the authority to teach the truth, but because the «truth» that the magisterium has the authority to teach is «truth for our salvation»; and although the above interpretation of the bara / asah distinction may conceivably be true, it is difficult to see how it can be a requirement for our salvation.

Indeed, they can be seen as traditions of human action, in distinction, although not separation, from traditions of thought.

One distinction that I make, and Martin does not see the importance of, is between eternity and everlastingness, or immortality.

Sarah does not say, but we can assume it lies in the distinction any Christian must see between Christian faith and modern ideologies.

Perhaps the most important distinction of all is between those congregations that see social service as part of their mission and those that do not.

By making a distinction between your faith which is constant and your beliefs that change, you can claim consistency while being inconsistent, and as we've seen your faith is not committed to any theology.

The distinction between the presence of the Risen Christ and the Holy Spirit is not always clear, either in John or Paul (see 2 Cor.

There is a close parallel in the interaction of metaphorical language and literal language; there is no sharp line between the two, but only a distinction which is relative, shifting, and contextdependent.31 «Man is a wolf» invites reflection not only on wolf - life characteristics of man, but also on man - like characteristics of the wolf, which is seen thereafter as more human.

NT does not make this distinction, and I see here you say to cool to touch on the counter.

As if losing to Sunderland and seeing John Terry banned for his final game at Stamford Bridge wasn't bad enough, Chelsea now have the «distinction» of being the worst Premier League title defender ever.

This isn't too difficult a distinction, thankfully, because it's very easy to weed out chowder imposters by simply taking a glance at their core ingredients and seeing if flour is included or not.

But NCB advocates do not make the distinction when they compare (see «caring» s post above) a dramatically bad outcome like this one to «she might have had to have a c - section!!!!»

I'm glad to hear of shuls that aren't doling out the candy just to get through Teffilot but also see a clear distinction between breastfeeding and Bamba.

It does, however, make a distinction between persons who have the «right of abode» (British citizens including a small minority of Commonwealth citizens) and those who do not have this right (for more details see Anderson and Blinder, 2014).

See also Alan's distinction between the message a campaign uses and the actual language they use: supporters can still spread a message even when they don't parrot a candidate's talking points verbatim.

The distinction is semantic, of course, and you may not see much of a difference between this formulation and what I describe as the norm.

He wanted to make a distinction between what he saw as a politics of blame, grievance and fear — in a clear if not explicit reference to UKIP — and what the Lib Dems offer.

People see a clear distinction between Albany, now, and Washington, which is not working,» said Sen. Charles Fuschillo, a Long Island Republican and one of the co-chairs of SRCC.

Still, Chapman says, he would not be surprised to see water ice on asteroids, adding that the distinction between comets, traditionally considered to be icy, and asteroids, which have been largely thought of as rocky, is becoming increasingly blurred.

«We saw a clear distinction: non-elective admissions drive the association between hospitalization and long - term changes in cognitive function in later life, while elective admissions do not necessarily carry the same risk of negative cognitive outcomes,» James said.