Sentences with phrase «not see these stats»

I don't know how many passes they made tonight, I haven't seen the stats.

Authors and publishers see these statistics because they own their page, but visitors to your page do not see these stats.

Not exact matches

When you look at his stats, you won't see any impressive spikes.

And I'm not just talking about a tiny drop either — the stats I've seen and heard show that reach is way down.

Though they don't advertise the feature, a few taps will bring you to the stats screen, where you can see how much time you've spent listening to your podcasts, as well as how much time you've saved by skipping forward, speeding up playback, trimming silence and skipping the intros to shows.

biased survey I don't think I've seen a more biased survey since University, and I hated stats courses back then.

You've seen the statistics that ominously warn of the failure rate within the first year of business, and while the stats don't necessarily tell the whole story, there's no doubt that making it through your first year is no cake walk.

Most of the time when I see stats like «local pages have 5 times the reach, 8 times the engagement level, and 40 times the overall impact» — that is not true.

Of course, stats isn't really what it's all about, but helping people and seeing change, but we can't measure that!

I guess in looking at Paul, I see writing, speaking and promoting but of course Paul was not trying to drive up blog stats or meet sales goals.

This must take into account the immediate fertilization, then subsequent failure of the egg where a woman doesn't even miss her regular period (no abortion going on there), as I've never seen any stats close to that, and from the friends and family that I have, miscarriages are rare — less than 10 %.

WE see that in the regular world why, the higher percentages of problems in the gay world would not reflect worse stats regardless of what those in the know say.

p.s. if you didn't know if you're on blogger you can see your stats in when you are writing a post (it's the right most tab at the top) also you can sign up for google analytics for free so that it tracks all kinds of crazy information about your own blog.

I saw your post and shared it on Facebook — and didn't even realize that you'd linked to my scones until I looked at my traffic stats.

anything other than a fantastic on these 2 fronts I see as an excuse to explain away another failure and another choke up... so Wenger, kindly shove all that stats on possession etc where the sun don't shine, you are full of bs, just like the majority of the lottery winners we call out players... all talk and nothing else.....

He will surely make it boring.I saw the stat of Che and MU game, MU had 70 % possession and had a better stat in everything.They definetly parked the bus, I just don't understand why he is called «special one».

I laughed when you said he will likely be the best player in the club he's moving to.I hope Arsenal fans don't deceive themselves also into thinking this.The thing he has over most wingers in the world is work rate.Apart from that in terms of technique, skill and talent there are quite a lot who can match him there or are even better.He won't have that patience of a club like Arsenal that allows for mistakes and he'll be benched even when he doesn't want it.I did mention that he was world class.The fact that you're overrated doesn't mean you aren't world class.I know all his stats and like you I've watched him since he came here and I can say we are making him look better than he actually is.As for him being irreplaceable I don't think it» sthe first time we heard that about an Arsenal player leaving and we saw how they eventually ended up.

See im portuguese and i once hated the thought of christiano ronaldo being the best portuguese player ever, the fact of matter is the ai nt sh $ t i can do about it, he continues to break records and set stats proving his ability.

He's inching closer and closer, but there are too many voters who didn't notice the magic that the others saw, and they're looking at the stats, just as confused as the rest of us.

What do you mean you do nt expect him to be good as De Gea.Why do you know anyone's future.If I was to be very honest with you even if we keep Ospina and sell Szczesny i do nt see him also becoming an all time great.To me he should go to Roma where i believe he can become an all time great.He is better than Ospina in terms of skill in goalkeeping but what makes Ospina better than him is that he acts more matured.You guys keep bringing up stats but we can all bring up stats for even a player who might not be better than another player but stats will make him look much better.Even hits stats show he is legendary but in actual sense he is not legendary.If u think am lying or talking too much lets Keep Ospina and sell Szcz and lets see.

SEE ALSO: Stats Reveal Top 10 Premier League Free Kick Takers Ever: Ronaldo Isn't Among Them!

You're a stats person aren't you PIRES, everything you talk about comes off the television or computer, you don't see a player and think,» he's a good player» or «he's had he's day».

That is a joke of a comment.I wonder what Arsenal fans can defend him apart from his stats when he's at his best.He is average when at his best and very very average at his worst.Stop overhyping this guy.Just so you know I'm not scared to say it like people here.I rank him with the likes of Chamakh and other average strikers who are just being given world class service upfront.I wish he never plays for Arsenal again and its agonising when I ever see him play.France is going out to be honest and it ai nt because he isnt gonna play.

Surely Le Prof must be seeing these stats every week and wondering why he didn't cash in on the Chilean in the summer.

You will see Avril's name on the stat sheet for the sack there, but not Bennett, who was the bringer of devastation on that play.

WHY LeProf keeps Ozil, Wilshere, Ramsey is not hard to see if you look games or stats.

Not sure how many times I pointed out an unbalanced formation last year and subsequently saw it exploited, but it happened way more often than it should for a «stats guy»

If fullback, winger and midfielder does not track back after an attack breaks down I should then wait for the Stats people to convince me that what I am seeing is not there?

Not sure what stats are but I would like to see intercepted balls, duels won for Azira vs Price or Cronin vs Price.

Why don't they see Luke's stats and see a good NBA player?

Did u see bother seeing cazorla stats... who is a better no. 10... cazorla for me... those chances that ozil created are not clear cut chances... that giroud goal against cp was that a clear cut goal scoring oppurtunity... NO

These three, as we all have seen, have their strengths and weaknesses which I won't go into because I believe we are all aware of the problems, but as the stats show, our balance is much better when Le Coq is in our starting XI.

I can not see «extreme inconsistency» in these stats and neither did I see it on the pitch during this period.

Suggestions that Barcelona sent club representatives to watch the Welsh international ten times last season, and with the stats to support the Spanish club's continued interest in the midfielder, this rumour doesn't seen to be one that will likely go away.

The single errors on Wade's and Austin's records don't reflect their consistency or lack thereof, but that's the reality of stats: they're a useful reference for games you haven't seen, but they can be as misleading as enlightening, especially fielding stats.

I don't know whether I'm happy with what I see, but if you look at Kovy's + / - in that way, he isn't as bad as his stat suggests...

Other than a severe bias against Jameis, I don't see the argument for saying he hasn't improved, a simple look at his stats show he has.

While watching, I saw that he is a good player but not that special so I decided to do a comparison with Coquelin albeit not a stats comparison...

Sometimes you do not need stats to tell you what you see, what you desire or need.

That was something that Jose said, he decided on Lukaku as Lacazette isn't a big game player... then I seen a stat of 5 goals in 35 games against the top 6 for Lukaku.

check the stats, they include international games, I do nt even recall seeing the guy play, but i am basing my opinión in stats.

I would like to see a stat of how many goals that went in from Ozil not pressing and / or chasing down the ball.

And for those who doesn't believe the stats, or don't think it can be seen against lesser teams, you would have thought it could be clear, when we as good as always come up short against the best teams in England or in Europe.

Lots of comments on here about perez, i have not seen him play so looked up the stats and compared him to griezman in la liga.

Also, I don't want to see you again listing other pl strikers goal stats, next to our players.

I would like to see a stat of how many goals have gone in from the lead up play of Özil not defending.

I do not see a «knack of making easy mistakes and inconsistencies» and the stats show the complete opposite.

am not sure what kind of stats he'd have wanted to see inorder to sign Mhicky but having a hand in over 50 goals in the bundesliga is enough for me.

Stats don't tell you everything, its clear to see who is the better forward.

The stats indicate that he still creates as many chances if not more but with people like welbeck who can't even score tap - ins it makes ozil look ineffective 4) If anybody truly watches a match when Ozil isn't playing and you see how the team struggles to even create a proper goalscoring chance.