Sentences with phrase «not see this ref»

I often refer to its claims myself, but I just can not see this ref is biased towards us, maybe just less biased against us than some, as the article says.

Not exact matches

By the way, for future ref., do nt block the tree during Christmas pics, we want to see!

In the Christian Institute for the Study - of Religion and Society there was an open discussion about a proposal that since Christ transcended not only cultures but also religions and ideologies, the fellowship of confessors of faith in Jesus as the Messiah should not separate from their original religious or secular ideological community but should form fellowships of Christian faith in those communities themselves, and that so long as the Law sees baptism as transference from one community to another it should not be made the condition of entry into the fellowship of the sacrament of the Lord's Supper but made a sacramental privilege for a later time (Ref.

I don't know how the refs can see 12 things at once.

Been waiting for someone to say that 3 dam penos 2 you could maybe have an excuse but the 3rd one when i seen the replay from behind the goal with the ref standing looking at it i cont know thank god it was 3 - 0 at the time and not 0 - 0....

it is not wengers fault the ref did nt give offside on feilani nor did he see him push gibbs.

It's almost as if the refs would call it at 3 steps, but once he just keeps going they are so flabbergasted that they freeze up because they assume what they are seeing can't actually be happening.

I agree it was best not to have called Ramsey off because we've seen players in offside positions throw defenses off with inconsistent calls / no calls from refs in the last few years (a couple of times we suffered because of these no calls).

To deflect from his terrible managing he uses this refs debate, and manages to con the section of one eyed fans that all clubs have, but not us fair minded ones who can see right through his deception, and thus keep at least some who sympathise with him.

If it wasn't for the ref, Bournemouth wouldn't even see the edge of the box.

To be honest I didn't see much of the tournament, but from the highlights I saw, the hosts got some help from the refs here and there and at the end they won the cup.

Unfortunately he never stayed down long or refs didn't see it.

Other leagues are seeing better results with VAR but they have better quality refs overall and the video official is generally a respected retired ref not a USL level ref.

We were up 10 in the early 4rth and remember the defense giving the offense the ball back... That was the time in the game when you put your foot on their throats... You play with all the energy and passion in the world and you put the game out of reach with a touchdown or even a field goal... You don't play not to loose, you come out aggressive as hell... Come out 5 wides with grant in the slot or something crazy that theyve never seen the whole game and you shredd their asses... You don't keep it close at that point because Brady will make plays and refs to as well to beat you.

I don't get why refs blow the whistle upon contact, especially when they can't see the ball.

Fortunately for Quick, the refs didn't see the butt - ending and so only Trouba was called for a penalty, but something tells me that the Department of Player Safety will have something to say about this play.

Player ratings GK - 5 not much to do looked a bit shaky on crosses Bel - 6 got forward but poor crossing Mon - 7 did ok but impact for the goal Gaby - 7 defended well looked solid Kos - 6 did ok Coq - 6 ok defensively but poor distribution Xhaka - 6 did ok at times but very average player Gibbs - 6 wing back looks to suit his ability but would like more from him Walcott - 5 looked average and positive enough in possession Ozil -4 poor in possession and none existent without the ball, luxury player Sanchez 5 worst game I've seen him have and embarrassed the team by going down after the ball hit him although the Leicester player deserved a ref

but ref did nt see it.

Refs didn't check to see if he was good to for the opening draw of the 2nd.

Pellegrini foul was so borderline that if i had been the ref i wouldn't have given it, but after seeing about 5 replays, it probably was a penalty... clearly no VAR in CL allows the refs to push through the favourites and we were on the end of the unlucky stick.

West Ham looked a very poor team, both goals coming from set piece free kicks, which really didn't look like they should've been given by the ref, and looked like they should've been both better defended and saved by Cech, but would have to see the replay.

If the ref had given the Swans the penalty which will see Swansea take 2 - 1 lead in the game, Its likely Chelsea will not have won that game

Haven't seen anything about this in the news... Touching the ref + making fun of his decision?

Dzeko went down a bit easily but mostly it was just that the contact was difficult for the ref to see... don't know where the other official was standing when he went down, but the ref was seeing it from behind, probably with Semedo blocking his view to a large extent.

As much as I would like to hate your comment above I have to agree with what you've said here I know there are a hardcore of bloggers on here that will be derisory and downright insulting (Keyboard warriors are always really tough) but unless we have the two new additions we need then we will sadly be another fourth spot contender again, its as simple as that the current squad is nearly there but nearly there is not THERE and I hate to say it but I think its gonna be another case of Wenger stubbornly trying to convince the world he is a genius by winning things without spending much OR by lamenting the injury problems and bad refs and being desultory about big oil funded clubs while the Club we love turns a fat profit for the board and we see no silverware at all.

However, if we were less bothered about the handball, you would have seen that a first time cross from oxlade chamberlain towards giroud would have made a clear cut chance for him We weren't lucky, both teams got decisions, but the ref was shocking.

Have you not seen the amount of free kicks Sterling.Hazard and Ali gain diving after a tackle.I know the refs don't but not you as well.

Can't you see Jon these refs are all controlled by Riley whose been described by many people not only me, ex managers, journalists etc as being one of the most bias referees ever to officiate the English game.

If the ref did not see it ok but the video show it and three man panel did nt see it no punishment given I speak of lukaku it sends a wrong message of the game pushing the ref away that is a red card they got away with it

Can you not see how Wenger is using the whole refs debate to deflect fans from his own whole ineptness.

One of those that players know it's a nothing but the problem is that refs don't usually see it the same way.

Some of us who can see clearly what lies ahead and don't buy into any of this penalty and ref hysteria and nonsense, can clearly see this is his last season, in all probability.

BTW, I don't see discussion here on the game one goal in the 1st period that was ignored by the ref.

It's nice to see the Lions not look for the refs as a scape goat, and quite honestly, they were lucky to be in overtime to begin with.

I would like to think the ref did not see it completely.

I mean Christ Danny Welbeck was let go for just slightly less than lucas Perez and Wenger wasn't even in the country when he was bought in, what does that tell you about the club and its ambitions????? if you added up the money spent on oriental and Japanese players who we NEVER see play in an arsenal shirt over the last ten years, we could have brought in half the Barcelona side including Messi so you tell me what THATS all about??? its a disgrace, and Giroud acting like a football god because he scored and equalizer really just epitomises the whole messed up attitude and THAT starts with Wenger and his «its not my fault it was the ref» attitude its stinks

In both cases the refs reacted poorly by not judging based on what was seen, but rather by the reactions of players.

The refs were poorly in favor of the gold and black, if you can't see that you are blind... However, that is not why we lost.

Harsh because the ref didn't see it and had to use VAR.

Well this was not the worst game we have seen on that front but I would say that the ref was very lenient throughout the game and as well as allowing the visitors to play a bit rough, he failed to produce yellow cards on a number of occasions.

Honestly what does he want, because we made him rich and famous and now he just looks like a person who doesn't really wan na be at the ground, because the only time I see him move is to argue with the ref.

He was obstructed by a slight pull on his arm in front of the goal with reasonable chance of nutmeging the keeper YES it seams light but in real speed he was obstructed and that's what the ref / linesman saw, if it was the EPL unless your Delle Alli its defenetly no penalty but some leagues they give free kicks for just about everything, if you look at stats in every country how long a game is played without interruption (game stoping) I think EPL has the longest time in play, not quite shore about Sweeden where the ref is from

Don't they say a ref could probably find a reason to throw a flag on any play, something tells me Saints are about to see that come true.

Afterwards Subban lost it and the refs didn't do anything because they didn't see anything.

When Ozil scored from Monreal's fired cross two minutes later, completing a great move down the left from Arsenal, it could have changed the game but the German's complained and the ref disallowed it for a handball, rubbing salt into the wound by booking Ozil even though he had not seen it to decide if it was deliberate, and the speed of the ball in makes that very harsh.

First of all, I don't think Latifi did anything wrong, but his sub of OSP made me think of scenarios where a fighter taps and the ref doesn't see it.

I don't think the refs can manage to even them up this game, which means I fear the hockeygods will see to it that we don't get enough PPs next game.

But it's aggravating that so much of the game and discussion is on nonsense ref shit and I can't see what is being discussed.

The only decision that went against us was caused by the linesman which the ref may not have seen in his position.

Refs don't like giving us the advantage because we're difficult to play against, they let the likes of Stoke play as rough and dirty as they can to make the game more «entertaining», most of the challenges you see here would never be accepted in Spain or Germany hence why their teams are on a whole other level when it comes to technical ability.