Meditation is
not a selfish act, it's a practice for each other.
This is
not a selfish act done only when you need something from someone.
It's
not a selfish act, either.
And even more importantly, know that doing so isn't a selfish act.
Not exact matches
Liberal Boomers, who seldom if ever seriously criticize the legions of conservative - demonizers in your midst, for this post I will mostly join Mr. Druckenmiller in accusing you outright, that is, I will
act as if this was your premeditated plan motivated by
selfish interest, and
not a pattern of political self - delusion that you fell into, given the drip - drip - drip of Democrat talking points over the years, given your gleeful listening to those who dismissed conservatives as hateful dunces, so that you ceased to even consider the NUMBERS conservatives kept pointing to, and just kept on doggedly voting D.
She speaks the language of love and compassion and her
act of love is
not motivated by
selfish gain.
That seemed to me a
selfish act on their part when there are many other prayers that aren't strictly Christian in origin.
It is
not a book of selflessness, it is a book of
acting selfless to have a reward at the end, which is in itself an exceedingly
selfish act.
The Church had always encouraged Christians to pray for those who had died; when indulgences began to be issued with the idea that they might be transferred to the souls in purgatory this was seen,
not without reason, as a praiseworthy raising of the motive for gaining an indulgence, from something
selfish to an
act of charity towards others.
Save your money and let God lead you to give to the poor, widows, children in need and the list goes on the
act of giving to your church is
not love it is
selfish because those who do believe they are going to enter the Kingdom of God because of it.
Regardless of any frustrations, justified or
not, it remains a
selfish and self defeating / self fulfilling
act.
Finally, empowerment involves actively supporting the empowerment of others in the community (it is
not just a
selfish act).
Obama's promise to «govern for all the people,
not just the interests of the wealthy and well - connected» came across more Andrew Jackson («the rich and powerful too often bend the
acts of government to their
selfish purposes») than Karl Marx.
Even though as college - educated, well - paid, two - parent households we might be in the best possible position to help these schools» most fundamental problem, we still can't
act to help the bad school districts become better, because of our (
selfish) desire to give our children the best education we can give them.
This notion, which Richard Dawkins of the University of Oxford so memorably called «the
selfish gene», seems, paradoxically and wonderfully, to explain
not only why animals sometimes
act selfishly, but also why they so often seem to cooperate.
He argued that the fundamental unit upon which natural selection
acted was
not the individual but rather the gene itself, which was intrinsically
selfish because it engaged in a battle against other genes for survival.
On the contrary, in choosing to conceive, parents are taking the necessary first steps for their child to come into existence; provided they are
not making these choices for
selfish reasons, they are
not treating their child as a means only and are
acting permissibly.
«You can't expect to draw people into your life who are kind, confident, and generous if you're thinking and
acting in cruel, weak, and
selfish...
Why don't we view that
act as
selfish?
And I wouldn't mind that concept, if the film at least had a story to go along with it, instead of segments (or skits) of humans
acting like
selfish, reactionary assholes.
Indeed, Stefan says next month's advocacy day isn't «some impulsive, irresponsible,
selfish act.»
2 are males and 1 is a female, and I knew that if I did
not act fast I will be having more kittens, so how could anyone call me cruel or
selfish for fixing the female?
To them, breeding animals is a
selfish act, and
not about the societal «greater good» or the welfare of the animals.
For example, in the 1936 New York State Court of Appeals, Cooper Union argued that it was «
not acting for
selfish reasons,» instead
acting «for the benefit of the public... performing the functions of the State by furnishing technical education and laboratory and library facilities, [which] places it in a position like that of a governmental body.»
It amazes me when people
act as if it is actually
selfish to choose
not to reproduce.
I'm sorry if I missed something, and I do agree that some people
act like «availability entrepreneurs» in the negative sense that the phrase conveys, but if the media can't restrict their reasonable use of that term to people who approach a public problem with a completely
selfish attitude, for their own benefit, then I would suggest
not using the term at all.