Sentences with phrase «not shareholder profits»

Unlike commercial bankers, Pentagon Federal Credit Union protects their members» best interests, not shareholder profits.

Not exact matches

These types of companies do not pay federal taxes at the corporate tax rate, but rather pass along profits and losses to their shareholders — in many cases, the business owners themselves — who are then taxed at the individual rate.

Net profit attributable to SES shareholders of EUR 98.2 million (Q1 2017: EUR 128.4 million) included a positive tax contribution related to the recognition of a deferred tax asset following the entry into service of SES - 16 / GovSat - 1 which is not expected to repeat.

At a recent Nasdaq luncheon Q&A, Schultz was challenged about his expansive view of «corporate social responsibility»: Was it not the role of the corporation simply to maximize profits for shareholders, who in turn can use the proceeds to do good in the world if they choose?

Managers don't promise to make a profit — such a promise would hardly be credible — but they do promise to at least try to make a profit, to have something left for shareholders after the bills are paid.

But executives at these and all other publicly held companies are obligated to use whatever legal means they can to generate the most profit possible; if they don't, shareholders will replace them with managers who will.

Don't misunderstand these figures, most of the profits went to shareholders and managers also did well, but this is beginning to look like a new form of capitalism where employees may also have potential access to a piece of the pie.

While she was C.E.O., Fiorina didn't increase the company's profits, and she actually decreased H.P.'s shareholders» wealth by 52 percent.

First, dividend stocks usually have time - tested business models and relatively clear long - term outlooks — otherwise they wouldn't be sharing a percentage of their profits with shareholders.

The performance goals upon which the payment or vesting of any Incentive Award (other than Options and stock appreciation rights) that is intended to qualify as Performance - Based Compensation depends shall relate to one or more of the following Performance Measures: market price of Capital Stock, earnings per share of Capital Stock, income, net income or profit (before or after taxes), economic profit, operating income, operating margin, profit margin, gross margins, return on equity or stockholder equity, total shareholder return, market capitalization, enterprise value, cash flow (including but not limited to operating cash flow and free cash flow), cash position, return on assets or net assets, return on capital, return on invested

You can gauge the interest in responsible investing simply from the increase in shareholder proposals being filed about ESG issues and the exponential growth in the number of questions being asked by institutional investors, researchers and clients - and as a CEO, I have to make trade offs that may not be in the best short term profit interest of the Bank but are viewed in our best long term interest.

The company has consistently increased its invested capital while not generating a subsequent increase in profits, thereby destroying shareholder value in the process.

Because it owns extensive insurance operations that experience fluctuating profits, it is not as easy to determine Berkshire's normal earnings power as it would be, for say, Kraft's food packaging divisions which have pretty predictable demand for macaroni and cheese, Oscar Meyer hot dogs, and Maxwell House coffee, but still — $ 12 billion is a good estimate of what «normal» profits look like each year for Berkshire shareholders.

Shareholders in a zoo near Shanghai, frustrated that they weren't making a profit on their investment, fed a live donkey to zoo tigers as a form of protest.

«U.S. multinational corporations can defer paying tax on profits they earn abroad indefinitely by agreeing not to use the earnings for certain purposes, like paying dividends to shareholders, financing domestic acquisitions, guaranteeing loans, or making investments in physical capital in the U.S..

While profits are ideally generated, the main aim is not to maximize financial returns for shareholders but to grow the social venture and reach more people in need.

It's a big challenge, not least because HP must find the money to reinvest in its businesses while continuing to deliver a profit to shareholders.

Corporations are legally separate from their shareholders so it doesn't matter when an individual dies, it's not a taxable event from the point of view of the corporation and if there are undistributed profits those profits will remain untaxed.

Because most ESOPs in closely held companies take place in situations where the founding owner wants to retire and cash out of the business, the issue of diluting profit per share and diluting the ownership and governance rights of majority shareholders is not a material issue in these cases.

(The major miners serve the bullion banks, not their shareholders, and have actively participated in gold's price destruction for years, starting with the «hedging» campaign that handed guaranteed profits to the banks and pitiful share prices to the stakeholders.)

Well - managed industrial companies do not, as a rule, distribute to the shareholders the whole of their earned profits.

Leading companies around the world are rapidly coming to the conclusion that operating a business focused solely on short - term, shareholder - driven profits will not be viable in the future.

Unlike stocks and mutual funds, Bitcoin is not subject to earnings, profits, shareholders, boards of directors.

That's because corporations plan to reward shareholders as profits increase, not raise wages for employees or hire more people.

Keep in mind that a dividend payment is not mandatory; the a business decision by the company to pay out a portion of it's profits to shareholders.

So the next time a customer asks, «but doesn't Ken Fisher say he hates annuities» you can answer «no — not really because in Ken's case he is motivated by good — good business profits, good shareholder returns, and regulation - free marketing and sales practices.»

Although the details of the two new bids remain vague, each would keep a so - called «stub» of Dell public, which would give shareholders who choose not to sell their stock the opportunity to profit if the company can execute its turnaround.

They can earn a profit, but profits are used to further its corporate goals (and not be distributed to shareholders, members or directors).

And that is a nightmare scenario because the primary corporate objective of the typical Vancouver promoter lies not in the realm of a new gold discovery or near - term cash flow or added reserves, but rather in the novel concept of «distribution» and by that I don't refer to the «distribution» of profits to shareholders by way of dividends but rather the distribution of the one - cent paper they manufactured when they put the shell together.

We're talking about large, mature companies that, while not growing at breakneck speeds, churn out consistent profits and create long - term shareholder value.

Dividend — A part of a company's profits paid to their shareholders; not the same as the payout bondholders receive when their bonds mature.

All along capital accumulation is not for consumption but for enhanced accumulation and profits and augments shareholder value which has been and continues to be the overriding goal of capitalism.

While things are looking up at Elders after a profit turnaround and some buoyant live cattle exports, shareholders shouldn't throw their Akubra hats in the air just yet.

But Bega's shareholders could be frustrated if it does not take the almost $ 70 million in profits it would bank by selling to Saputo.

Bega's shareholders may be frustrated if it does not take the near - $ 70 million in profits it would bank by selling to Saputo.

In no event shall BEAM SUNTORY, its parents, affiliates, subsidiaries and services providers, or the officers, directors, employees, shareholders, or agents of each of them, be liable for any damages of any kind, including without limitation any direct, special, incidental, indirect, exemplary, punitive or consequential damages, including lost profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of such damages, and on theory of liability whatsoever, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of, or your browsing in, or your links to other sites from, this Site.

Shareholders, sales targets, and growth models should probably be eschewed in favour of cooperatives, not - for - profits, and mindfully remaining small and local.

There are many other examples of the clubs lack of ambition and ineptitude over the last ten years and I don't have either the patience or the time to go through the whole catalogue, its clear to anyone who is clear headed and able to for a reasonably intelligent opinion that our beloved club is being run by a bunch of silver spooned business men who car nothing for the clubs status within the areana that it operates only for the share prices and profit and loss margins and they are aided by a stubborn and deluded manager who has failed to deliver the EPL to his clubs fans for over ten years and who has failed to move with the times simply because he can retain his role in the club and deliver the minimum of results but maximum profit to the shareholders and board.

We have a 30 % stakeholder who is desperate to invest in the team but is held back by a board that is obsessed in retaining the profits for itself — I have never heard of such a major shareholder NOT being allowed on the board.

I'm totally confused.I guess our current shareholders and Wenger are after profit and not titles.go on and thumb me down, ten years without winning the bpl and I have lost faith in the clubs management.

Kroenke and the shareholders aren't making profits yet, as neither him, the Board or Usmanov take out dividends....

While some here may welcome this position, I ask the boards and I ask shareholders to respect that some of the areas Nestlé is entering into are not where you should be trying to boost your profits.

Osbourne missed a trick: he should be asking why Labour is not doing more to help the banks to generate big, taxable profits for its new shareholders.

They are commercially run civic institutions that seek to support growth and innovation in their local areas, not maximise profits for shareholders.

This would not be the case for a turnover tax, and hence could give rise to double taxation of the same profits when paid to foreign shareholders.

For example, taxing dividends and capital gains on the sale of stock at about 71 % of the hypothetically fair tax rate at the shareholder level, and taxing corporate profits at about 71 % of the hypothetically fair tax rate at the corporate level, is economically equivalent to not having double taxation.

Because dividends are not tax free (as they are in pass through entities once tax on entity level earning has been paid by the owners - which would look politically ugly in a publicly held company context letting people receive millions in dividends and pay not taxes on it), and there is no deduction for dividends paid to the corporation (in most contexts), and there is no tax credit for taxes paid at the corporate level against income tax liability on dividends, the end result is that there is double taxation of corporate profits both when the profits are earned by the corporation and again when they are distributed to shareholders.

This is the solution used for pass through taxation entities, where deferral of taxation is avoided by the pass through mechanism that immediately taxes shareholders whether or not profits are distributed, but it becomes complex when the entity incurs taxes in many states that must be passed on to all of the owners to report proportionately on their individual tax returns.

It is to be hoped that as a result of this policy, come 2015, a UK government will no longer turn a blind eye to the obscenity of the preventable deaths each year of those who can not afford to pay for the unreasonable profits of energy company executives and their shareholders.

BSI is a non-profit distributing organisation, meaning it is independent from government and profits are not distributed to its directors, shareholders, employees, or anyone else; they are reinvested into the services provided.