Sentences with phrase «not sharp side»

When you have made your round cake of bread, get your bread knife and rub flour on the not sharp side.

Not exact matches

After white nationalists clashed with protesters in Charlottesville this weekend, Trump did not initially condemn white supremacists or racists by name, prompting sharp criticism from all sides.

While, at times, he talked as a Greek in setting flesh and spirit in sharp opposition, he always was thinking as a Jew; he was contrasting, not material flesh and immaterial spirit, but the natural man uninspired by the divine Spirit, on one side, and the spiritual man transformed by God's grace, on the other.

I put Ron Paul to the side because, even if the Republicans do someday nominate a gold standard supporter who wants sharp defense cuts, but it won't be this year, won't be someone who thinks he wants to zero out nuclear weapons production, and military nuclear propulsion production, transportation, and testing, and it won't be a ex-publisher of racist newsletters who can't fully come clean.

It is hard to say what political side Biden is on, there was a time I thought he was a pretty sharp guy but that was before I saw and read more about him, it's a shame his mouth isn't connected to his brain.

I did this by scooping it out with a sharp tipped spoon from the top, but you could also make a slit lengthwise along the side of each onion to make it easier (though then you'll have to push your onions back together so the filling doesn't fall out).

I don't use a huge knife like in this video, but I do use a darn sharp one, or else the membranes will collapse when you're trying to slice on either side of them.

Holding a sharp knife parallel to the work surface and beginning on a long side, butterfly turkey by cutting horizontally almost in half (not all the way through), then opening it like a book.

Insert a boning knife if you have one or a sharp steak knife into the end of the chop and gently slice a pocket being careful not to poke out the sides.

We still haven't seen sharp money take a side, but this free line value is a hallmark of the contrarian betting strategy.

Oddsmakers do not attempt to balance their book by attracting 50 percent of the action on each side but rather shade their opening lines to capitalize on public perception and then allow their sharpest bettors to shape the line.

Every sport book today is computerized, Back in my day money always moved the line if a player was respected, and if the squares tossed enough money on a game most books would move the line a little, However the big books would just sit and even take layoffs from the small stores, They knew even if the squares got hot in the end the juice would eat em up.Gone are the days when Billy Walters and his crew would move the line 3 and 4 points, I'm talking sides not totals, Forget about what they did to the horseshoe with totals in the NBA, Back then you could catch small non computerized stores with bad lines to begin with, imagine a three point move and the small store or corner bookie is off on the line a few points to begin with, I could catch some game with 6 and seven point advantages, with computers today if you can catch a half or one point advantage your lucky.Even if you know the group moving the line most of these store move the lines on air, when I say air they just watch the screen from D.B. And move the line before they even get hit, Hell even the big stores have the sharps on small limits per call.

He's obviously not as sharp as when he had youth on side but hands down he is one of the prems finest.

I would say on the creative side we were not sharp enough.

During the regular season, sportsbooks almost always adjust their lines based on the action of their sharpest bettors, and they won't move the number based on public money unless there's a marquee matchup with one - sided public betting and limited sharp action on the other side.

One such game has caught the eyes of sharps and squares alike, though I'm sure you'll be shocked to learn that they're not on the same side.

Sharp money hasn't taken a side in this matchup, but one - sided public betting appears to have created some contrarian value on the Boilermakers.

This influx of bets and public money on one side ends up creating value on the other side; the line may move and sharps will come in to grab it, or the line won't move and sportsbooks will end up with more liability on the public side.

As always, if you like either side, feel free to take it, but there hasn't been many sharp money indications to make us feel strongly about either team.

«The sharps aren't involved in every matchup every night, so when they aren't, we'll adjust the numbers if we've got too great of public exposure on one side.

Since sportsbooks will only adjust their lines based on public money in games where sharp money isn't involved, I wanted to examine the same contrarian strategies when no Pinnacle steam moves had been triggered on the public side.

It's also worth noting that oddsmakers respect the opinion of their sharpest bettors, and won't adjust based on public money if those sharps have taken a side.

With balanced public betting, limited line movement and no betting systems triggered, it doesn't look like sharp money has taken a side on tonight's spread.

Between the split pubic betting trends and the limited line movement, sharp money doesn't seem to have picked a side in this game; however, the more interesting line movement has been in regards to the total.

In fact, many bettors that I have spoken with believe that one - sided money percentages are an excellent indicator of sharp money, but that's simply not the case.

Betting against the public is a profitable strategy, but bettors need to ensure that sharps and squares aren't on the same side.

Betting market: Not only are the ticket percentages in this game relatively even (see chart below), but sharp money come down on both sides earlier in the week, with Steam Moves triggered at Alabama -3 and Clemson +3.

Instead of trying to decipher which side is stronger, sometimes laying off and not placing a bet is the real sharp move.

Selectivity is a virtue, and it's important to know that there isn't necessarily a sharp side in every game.

That's especially true if it's a heavily bet game (i.e. Spurs vs. Warriors), or if there's not enough buyback from sharp bettors on the other side.

Sportsbooks aren't looking to attract equal action on each side, they're looking to capitalize on the predictable tendencies of casual bettors and allow their sharpest bettors to shape the line.

Left side will be awkward though but maybe that could have a starting player come in soon... Not forgetting Gibbs, I do like him when fit and match sharp but that happens like a leap year, 1 day in every 4 years XD

We still haven't seen sharp money pick a side on the total, so it will be interesting to monitor this total throughout the week — especially when the limits are increased closer to kick off.

This doesn't necessarily mean that sharp money has taken a side, but we would have preferred to see a higher dollar figure on Ole Miss to confirm our sharp money indicators.

This would seem to indicate that there's slight contrarian value on Tampa Bay, but sharp money has not taken a side.

It doesn't appear that there is an overwhelming amount of sharp support on either side, though, as the line remains where it opened at 6.5 at Bookmaker.

If you're not crunching numbers on your supercomputer at home, you might find yourself wondering what sides and totals sharp bettors are taking for these big games.

Assuming sharp bettors aren't heavily involved; this public money will create artificial line value for contrarian bettors willing to take the unpopular side of a game.

There are circumstances where we have a Duke vs. UNC matchup and the sharps aren't involved, we will adjust there for public money if we have liability on one side.»

Don't worry, you don't have to bet on Duke if you don't want to, but Mark Gallant breaks down which side of this matchup has become a favorite of sharp bettors.

In other words, sportsbooks almost always adjust their lines based on the action of their sharpest bettors, and they won't move the number based on public money unless there's a marquee matchup with one - sided public betting and limited sharp action on the other side.

When sharp bettors aren't involved, sportsbooks will adjust their numbers if there's a significant exposure on one side.

While recreational players can't throw their money at Jared Goff fast enough, professionals have spent the week pounding the hook which not only helps balance the books for oddsmakers, but also fires a warning shot that sharp money is ready to pounce should sportsbooks give into one - sided Rams action and adjust to 4.

That means you're not going to find and value unless you're targeting games with extreme levels of one - sided public betting and limited sharp involvement.

They are okay if the public loads up on one side as long as sharps don't join in because they are able to predict who bettors will like for each game, and set the lines accordingly.

If there wasn't a need to have one sided action to balance the future book shading prices too much would invite an undesirable deluge of one sided sharp action from the professionals.

With all of these lines trending toward the contrarian side, don't be surprised to see a couple show up in tonight's Sharp Action Report.

He looked sharp against a notoriously defensive West Brom side and both Giroud and Alexis Sanchez were unlucky not to be on the scoresheet earlier in the game.

The sharps however are not in agreement and we've seen sharp money show for both sides.

Hopefully I haven't jinxed myself by highlighting this season's 66.66 % win percentage where sharp action has shown for one side on our featured games, but take a look below to see if you agree with the early line movement.