Sentences with phrase «not simple issues»

These are not simple issues.

My big thing is this is not a simple issue.

This is not a simple issue that is solved by playing both sides of the fence (pun unintended).

Human trafficking is not a simple issue, is it?

With disagreement over US c - section rates alone, this isn't a simple issue.

«Summer setback,» then, isn't a simple issue, complicating efforts to make simple recommendations.

Not a simple issue, to be sure, especially when you factor in the variance of margins involved with front list vs. back list titles, the timing of release of e-book editions and the amortization of development expense, the agency model, etc..

That is not a simple issue with the arguments.

I was a childhood asthma sufferer myself and know that it is not a simple issue.

It's not a simple issue.

It isn't that simple an issue.

While this is not a simple issue to address, provinces could make a decent start by appointing designated judges under FHRMIRA, educating reserve residents, police, and social services about its provisions, and allocating enough money to ensure that those who need orders have help applying for them, and those who have obtained orders can have them enforced.

Auto insurance is not the simplest issue to understand.

Do not irritate hiring manager, trying to solve not the simplest issue.

The gender wage gap, while apparent, isn't the simple issue that politicians or interest groups would like the general public to believe.

Not exact matches

One of the main issues facing voice assistants is that users simply don't know how to use them beyond simple commands like playing music or getting weather updates.

For instance, with a telemarketer who is hard to shake, issue a simple and firm, «Excuse me, I don't buy subscriptions / internet packages / solar panels from telemarketers.

The last thing you can afford is for your remote employees to constantly be tying up your IT team with simple problems that shouldn't be an issue.

The problem is a government that can't seem to get to yes on even the simplest issues.

In the end, I guess my point really is that environmental sustainability is important all on its own, and doesn't need to be fluffed up with issues like workplace safety or leadership diversity or CEO pay; and issues like workplace safety and leadership diversity and CEO pay are too important to stuff into the simple concept of sustainability.

However, Brittin explained that the issue of brand safety is not as simple as it may seem.

«We lose core user after core user by not addressing simple trolling issues that they face every day.»

I'll point you to The Verge's excellent writeup on the issue, but in simple terms, more than a few of these devices can not adequately deal with the amount of power USB - C pushes.

Maybe it's annual reviews, terminating an employee, deciding whether or not to launch a new product, or even something as simple (yet, mind - numbingly complicated) as a customer issue.

As it turned out, they had made a simple Excel error, but if the issue hadn't been so politically potent, the mistake would probably have never been found.

In general, if you're relatively healthy and wouldn't mind a simple medical exam, traditional life insurance is the better option because it will likely be less expensive than a simplified issue life insurance policy.

CDR --- your projection for your end result is probably correct.The wealth of switzerland will be the value of its international portfolio.If it is so easy why doesn't everyone do this.It is similar to the perpetual money machine of the U.S. Fed — they build a massive balance sheet of U.S. treasury debt and then clip the coupons and pass the «earnings» back to the Treasury filling the gap of an ever expanding deficit.Following the Swiss model the Treasury should just issue more debt and sell it to the FED and collect the annual interest income — simple

You are ham - handedly attempting to make this a simple issue when it isn't.

The problem is many of us try to make these issues black - and - white simple when they often are not.

The underlying fundemental philosophy that shades one's particular side of this issue is: Either you're personally OK with paying your taxes to help the poor OR you don't want to pay to help the poor... it's that simple.

again to say such would make the mind simplistic... LOGIC says such psychological issues are not simple..

While I definitely agree that his response is great in many circumstances and (without knowing the context of that conversation) may have been the perfect thing to say at that moment, I think calling this statement «a template that can be used to respond to questions concerning sexuality, gender and other important issues» reduces a very complex issue down to a very simple response that doesn't really answer any questions for anyone.

To answer your question... yes I am exploring the same issues by creating a very simple series of short vidoes placed on the web which exmaines a different path for the 21st century church to follow and what it could look like, Its not advertised but about 3500 viewings so far.

@Crazy Horse, «So on a more seemingly simple issue as family planning, the easiest answer, «fix me so I don't make babies» — is in every aspect against the teachings of Jesus and Scripture.»

So on a more seemingly simple issue as family planning, the easiest answer, «fix me so I don't make babies» — is in every aspect against the teachings of Jesus and Scripture.

It's a simple issue of categorization — it's a question of FACT: Can the Pope's policy administrations be categorized as Marxist or not?

We're a colorful group, composed of members of the great right - wing conspiracy like me, old - time Southern Democrats, retired union stewards, tree huggers, school teachers, Jews, evangelicals, atheists, Catholics ¯ but we are united in our passion for simple, honest government, and that isn't a partisan issue.

The Relevance of Cosmic Unity In the lead letter of the same issue of Philosophy Now the prominent anti-reductionist philosopher of ethics and of science Mary Midgely makes a point often made by Edward Holloway (though he might not have used the word «choice»), namely that «simple logic surely shows that natural selection can not be the universal explanation because «selection» only makes sense a clearly specified range of choices — an idea to which far too little attention has been given.»

You seek to ignore one of the key issues in the entire debate as «not meriting a response» with a simple statement of denial.

But the issue is not this simple.

I want to say that I think this is a very valid question — but the answer to the issue is not so simple as you might think.

While the wholistic, planetary perspective leads some to insist that all will be well if a «creation spirituality» were to replace the traditional «redemption spirituality» of the Christian tradition, the issue is not that simple.

It is quite staggering how many students do not understand some of the most simple doctrines and liturgical practices and, indeed, do not accept, or feel uncomfortable with the Church's teaching on moral issues.

Gordon Kaufman, for example, pointed out some years ago that existentialist theology remarkably overlooks the simple fact that every mental or historical event is also an occurrence within nature, not outside of it.10 And yet the assumptions of dualism and materialism continue to infect our theologies, including some of those that have begun to turn their attention to environmental issues.

Fackre spoke of the commendable concern to link systematics to modem issues; my sense of biblical studies is that the greatest danger is the opposite: not appreciating the simple foreignness of the Bible and its world.

I think an employer has a moral obligation to be concerned about the welfare of one's employee's — maybe not legally required (to a degree)-- i wish it were simple that people could just quit an employer that had no concern for the people so that enterprise would go under or wise up — i think though employers are actually more upset about money instead of morals — women and doctors should be deciding such issues — i do not know y i even bother posting since i know these posts will not actually affect anything --

From the simple dialectic of death and resurrection issues a monstrous system which denies the absolute validity of Christ's death and resurrection and, in the final analysis, can not explain the absolute authority of Jesus in history.

(The MacKinnon model is simpler in this respect; since there is no need to make distinctions among rapists, the issue does not arise.)

For those in the middle, however — most especially Conservative spokesmen and the modern Orthodox — the issue is not so simple.

I really don't see the issue with using a bright, simple, colorful tool when it's available and will help the good idea spread — ESPECIALLY when I am always willing to debate for long hours into the late night and early morning hours with people I don't know at all and who are hostile to my message and presence..