Sentences with phrase «not skeptics»

Interestingly, each of the conversations I had with people who were not skeptics surprised me.

As I said before, not all skeptics adhere to the nonsensical claims of someone like Tony Heller / Steve Goddard.

These scientists are not skeptics in the sense the word is presently used, but skeptics in the tradition of science, who do not accept limited evidence as proof.

Whether or not the skeptics are correct.

At least for those who see the big picture (e.g. not skeptics).

Wait, those were not skeptics.

Not all skeptics agree with 3.7 Wm - 2.

You and other believers, not skeptics.

So if scientists want to convince me of the necessity of action asap, they have only one choice: hammer away at the uncertainties (not the skeptics) and nail down the science.

It was model developers that identified the error in the climate model and corrected it not skeptics.

If the red team are disinterested and not skeptics, then shouldn't shouldn't the blue team be the same — ie.

Link to «Deniers are not skeptics» post at CSI is broken, apparently a couple of stray characters at the end.

My judgment is on which side of the argument has the experts that impress me more, and I'll let you in on some bad news — its not the skeptics.

Not the skeptics, not the alarmists, NOBODY.

If scientists are not skeptics, they are not scientists.

It is not the skeptics hypothesis that the world is warming at an alarming rate and that is increasing (The head of IPCC).

a # 3: the ones that accepted the phony global warming — they are NOT Skeptics, BUT Warmist in - bedded into the skeptic's camp; recognized by their botanical name:» the Fake Skeptics»

Such people are not skeptics — if they use sources such as talk - radio and blogs for scientific information, they're gullible idiots.

Again, there's no clutching at straws here, and i would kindly suggest that it is not skeptics who do this.

We / I am labelling those who are not skeptics, but who have an irrational and prejudiced disbelief against GW.

And, there are still two groups but not the Skeptics and the Alarmists as outlined above.

Not all skeptics, however, are dissuaded by these recent findings.

Baseless assertions are the trademark of religious people that rely on blind faith, not skeptics.

He wasn't a skeptic after the fashion of the legal realists who would rise to prominence in the law schools fifty years or so after his death.

I recognize this isn't skeptics, but I'm hoping we have a higher standard of evidence here.

I'm not a skeptic; I'm a pragmatist.

So you think Skeptics don't get threatened?Didn't Santer want to beat the crap out of Pat Michaels?And why shouldn't skeptics be allowed free speech instead of the warmists trying to silence them?

They aren't skeptics.

I've been a persistent poster here, and am obviously not a skeptic.

For the record (and speaking for myself, not the skeptic community), with a couple of nuances and one generality, I agree the six «skeptic arguments» of this thread have little scientific credibility.

I am not a skeptic in the sense you mean, but let me recommend «Meltdown» by Dr. Patrick Michaels, as long as it is not the only book you read.

I'm not a skeptic.

The problem isn't that skeptics are stupid, or skeptics are annoying, or skeptics are anti-science.

Roger Pielke sr, who is not a skeptic, has been called a synonym of crank, by Chris Colose on another platform, for doubting the ability of climate model projections.

That seems a reasonable enough challenge to me, particularly given the data in this post and this quote from Judith Currey, certainly not a skeptic:

«This is not a skeptic,» he crows.

-- Scientist - filmmaker Randy Olson, who is not a skeptic.

At 12:29 AM on 4 September, Joe Duarte had written: «One of the reasons I'm not a skeptic is that I'm a libertarian, which sounds weird.

If they didn't the skeptics are still winning.

I'm not a skeptic of the transit method of exoplanet detection — seems pretty solid to me.

I'm not a skeptic for a few reasons, the biggest is probably that I think climate scientists are very smart.

Why don't you skeptics go after your fellow skeptics who practice such shoddy research and make claims with the most threadbare of evidence?

But if you say that the warming has «paused» or «stopped,» and then if you also say that you think that ACO2 warms the climate, then you are being illogical, and you are a «skeptic» not a skeptic.

Why can't skeptics play the same game in reverse?

... Remember, this guy is mainstream, not a skeptic, and you may need to remind yourself of that fact several times as [you] read through his comment on the executive summary of the chapter:» This topic was also later picked up and commented on at WUWT.

He wasn't a skeptic, he was only ever a «scientific skeptic».

MJ.com: Why haven't the skeptics gained traction in Europe?

Tol is not a skeptic, the article that he botched was a review piece and it seems additionally that he was misquoted.

It's not the skeptic's messaging that has people seeing this in various countries.

vg writes «BTW I believe the owner of Solar 24 is definitely not a skeptic» Kevin, the owner of http://www.solarcycle24.com, has NO views on AGW so far as I am aware.