Perhaps
not the social norm, but certainly the physiological norm, for all babies, all around the world.
In settings where breastfeeding is
not the social norm, support can increase women's belief in breastfeeding, and give them confidence to continue breastfeeding in the face of societal and family pressures that might undermine breastfeeding.
«[Still] it was interesting to establish that pirating is
not the social norm amongst Australians aged 12 to 17 despite the anecdotal assertion that «everyone does it».»
Not exact matches
«
Social norms, which are people's beliefs about what institutions and other people consider acceptable behavior, powerfully influence what people do and don't do,» the pair wrote.
In this «multi» world, it's the
norm,
not the exception, for inordinate amounts of emails, websites, mobile sites and apps, coupons, seasonal promotions and
social messages to pour in across all channels.
They provide all of us with a sense of purpose and hope; moral validation that we are needed and part of something bigger than ourselves; comfort that we are
not alone and a community is looking out for us; mentorship, guidance and personal development; a safety net; values, cultural
norms and accountability;
social gatherings, rituals and a way to meet new people; and a way to pass time.
If a group excludes me [an evolutionary tool adapted to enforce
social norms] and I try to break my way back in, the group may
not try as subtle an exclusionary behavior the next time.
With a community of more than 2 billion people, all around the world, in every different country, where there are wildly different
social and cultural
norms, it's just
not clear to me that us sitting in an office here in California are best placed to always determine what the policies should be for people all around the world.
Habits once erratic and highly individual ultimately became the
social norm» Now, I understand that basic logic 101 keeps me from implying the following but hey I am
not getting a grade on this; This explains why the vast majority of people beleive in God.
Whether or
not there is a heaven, as reward, I would rather strive to a truly higher ideal, than live down to a common «
social norm» that degrades us to mere animal status, living for our own pleasure and telling us that our more base desires are good, natural and should
not be considered something to be overcome.
Self - important simpletons commonly hate anyone that isn't bound to the «moral» standards of verses such as Leviticus 20:13 which commands putting people to death that are
not within the primitive
social norms of living in caves and sacrificing goats and children and owning slaves.
Put an objective observer (I know, there's no such thing) into a community and in a few weeks or months, depending on the complexity of that community, you will be able to describe their political (
not a bad word) and
social structure, you will uncover their
norms and mores, their rules, very often unspoken or only spoken and
not written.
Let us demand that individuals be judged for their concrete actions,
not their fealty to arbitrary
social norms and illusory categorizations.
It's
not the ideal of sexual purity, per se, that causes these challenges, but purity culture, a
social system of
norms, rewards, and punishments that presents perfection as the sole ideal.
Its founder Sampson Raphael Hirsch's sectarian decision to break with the organized Jewish community was in line with his general philosophy — that Judaism was eternal,
not based on history,
social development, or people's mores and
norms.
Insofar as freedom can
not be so defined, a proscription on external coercion requires a substantive principle or
norm of
social action.
In contrast to some forms of rule - teleology, I understand indirect applications to mean that the comprehensive telos justifies
social practices, that is, institutions or patterns of coordination in which the participating
social actions can
not be described independently of constitutive
norms or principles that bind actors whatever the consequences (cf. Rawls, «Two Concepts»).
Still, the case against teleological ethics may here offer this response: Granting the difference between direct and indirect applications, this yields only the familiar distinction between «act - teleology» and «rule - teleology, «3 is problematic for the following reason:
Social practices or patterns of social cooperation can not be validated teleologically without a comparative assessment of the good and evil consequences differing possible systems of rules or norms (for instance, differing sets of rights) are likely, if adopted, to pr
Social practices or patterns of
social cooperation can not be validated teleologically without a comparative assessment of the good and evil consequences differing possible systems of rules or norms (for instance, differing sets of rights) are likely, if adopted, to pr
social cooperation can
not be validated teleologically without a comparative assessment of the good and evil consequences differing possible systems of rules or
norms (for instance, differing sets of rights) are likely, if adopted, to produce.
No, we don't all have absolute ethical moral standards, but that doesn't deny us the ability to criticize the horrific actions of regions with different
social norms.
I guess it's true... rednecks aren't really all that religious, they just claim to be so because it's the expected
social norm down there.
Yes, Phoebe is embedded deeply enough in the culture around her to want to lose weight, but she is a sparkling and animated young woman who mostly enjoys her life and refuses to be so controlled by her diet, or the
social norms around her, that she won't defiantly consume a bag of buttery popcorn now and then.
Secondly I argue that the New Testament's seeing Jesus as example is a necessary correlate of what later theology calls his divine sonship (the other side of the «incarnation»), in such a way that those who downgrade the weight of Jesus» example, on the grounds that his particular
social location or example can
not be a
norm, renew a counterpart of the old «Ebionitic» heresy.
«It should
not be for the state to decide which parts of the Bible can and can
not be quoted during preaching, nor to dictate that verses that some may find unpalatable should be interpreted to fit with current
social norms.
Orwin goes on to say that Liberal Democracy doesn't work like that in practice because it actually assumes a particular conception of the good: «For so long as you observe prevailing liberal democratic
norms on all fundamental
social questions, you're free in merely secondary matters to continue in the ways of your ancestors.»
Niebuhr said that the relevant
norm for political decisions and
social policy is
not love, as the liberals had claimed, but justice.
If my analysis is fundamentally accurate, liberalism's endgame is unsustainable in every respect: It can
not perpetually enforce order upon a collection of autonomous individuals increasingly shorn of constitutive
social norms, nor can it continually provide endless material growth in a world of limits.
This is particularly relevant when considering honesty in robots: «If robots are going to be present in everyday situations, then there is a host of
social norms which humans know about but which a robot won't.
In his classic text The Individual and the
Social World, psychologist Stanley Milgram warned against overstating the case for urban incivility: «In some instances it is
not simply that, in the city, traditional courtesies are violated; rather, the cities develop new
norms of noninvolvement.»
True, it goes without saying that if a man can
not in conscience accept the doctrine of the Church as the
norm of his faith, this must be respected by others, whether they think his view right or
not; and the Church, too, must respect such a conviction and may
not suppress it by
social pressures or prevent its expression.
Our
norms for moral action are
not drawn from a disinterested study of objective reality, but are absorbed from the
social environs of our childhood.
David Landry does
not hesitate to speak directly to corporate
social issues about abortion, drug abuse, ecological rape, or minority rights in Metro City and beyond because he understands
social contextuality as the
norm for the Word realizing itself.
, a question deriving
not so much from the Catholic tradition as from the dilemma of cradle Catholics caught up in the maelstrom of collapsing
social norms and carnal yearnings unleashed by the sexual revolution of the «sixties, of which we can say, in Lady Bracknell's words»... I presume you know what that unfortunate movement led to?»
It doesn't matter if the Pig is a brilliant
Social Justice Warrior — they are self - centric well beyond the
norm.
To proclaim certain moral
norms to be universal — whether because they are rooted in the psychological predispositions of the human person, the anthropological constitution of all human civilizations, or the
social contract of a human community — means that these
norms are
not controversial and will
not be contested.
And no, I don't just disregard science (nor the common consensus in matters of politics,
social norms, alternative lifestyles, etc.)-- I understand the importance, but also the shortcomings of relying on man's own inferences about the nature of life, the universe, and the meaning of existence.
However halting, despite the hiccoughs and errors, it's hard
not to be strangely warmed that many churches aspire to replicate the work of the early church, stunningly summarized by Rodney Stark in one of my favorite quotations: «Christianity revitalized life in Greco - Roman cities by providing new
norms and new kinds of
social relationships able to cope with many urgent urban problems.
This process of secularization is deeply connected to the rise of a neo-liberal economic and
social consensus, one
not based on traditional
norms but united by a search for ever - greater utility.
There are a lot of debates in the humanities about the relative influence of agency (the will and power of individuals), institutions, and structure (a more abstract concepts including things like
social norms and expectations which are
not formalized).
Scalia insists repeatedly that malleable judicial standards» reflected
not only in the Court's appeals to evolving
social norms, foreign courts, and living documents, but also, in some cases, in its reliance on authorial intent» give the Court carte blanche to impose its arbitrary will.
Contemporary biblical studies persuasively indicate that the major theme of the story and concern of the writer were
not homosexual activity as such but rather the breach of ancient Hebrew hospitality
norms and persistent violations of rudimentary
social justice.
Moore did
not appeal directly to Scripture and tradition for teen - age sexual
norms; rather, he appealed to an ethic of
social justice and fulfillment.
He went on: «But including Christian in our list [of principles] does
not imply any requirement for individual faith, but it reflects the Judeo - Christian classical and enlightenment origins on which our laws, our
social systems and our cultural
norms have been built over two millennia.
(According to Krugman, changing
social norms,
not economic productivity, explain these obscenely large incomes.)
Its attitudes are found in every branch of Christendom: the quest for negative status, the elevation of minor issues to a place of major importance, the use of
social mores as a
norm of virtue, the toleration of one's own prejudice but
not the prejudice of others, the confusion of the church with a denomination, and the avoidance of prophetic scrutiny by using the Word of God as an instrument of self - security but
not self - criticism.
09) Gay marriage will change the foundation of society; we could never adapt to new
social norms, just like we haven't adapted to cars, the service - sector economy, or longer life spans.
Ha ha,» than «
Social Norms in Baseball: How Kant's Science of the Moral World Informs the Decision to Cheat,» but that doesn't change the fact that Bonds had an advantage.
Don't let
social norms and middle - aged white men in the media guilt you into it, though.
... These vocabularies do
not invite consideration of what the pattern of transgression of
norms at a
social, collective level might indicate about those
norms.
«Interestingly, [our] study did
not find significant clustering of muscle - enhancing behaviors within schools,» said Eisenberg, which suggests that, «rather than being driven by a particular sports team coach or other features of a school
social landscape, muscle - enhancing behaviors are widespread and influenced by factors beyond school, likely encompassing
social and cultural variables such as media messages and
social norms of behavior more broadly.»
And what about these other rules that aren't laws, but they are so ingrained in our culture that we don't even need them to be laws because the citizens keep them alive through
social norms?