Sentences with phrase «not subject his children»

Specifically, he says that the line familiar to us English speakers as «lead us not into temptation» should be rendered as «let us not fall into temptation,» because a loving Father does not subject His children to evil.

For now, he cautions, CRISPR's safety and efficacy haven't been established, so parents shouldn't subject their children to the risks.

I am not subjecting my child to any more of a threat than being beaten by a family member.

Usually and ideally, a GAL would take an active role in parenting questions, while taking a secondary role in property division and maintenance with the primary concern being that the economic arrangements are sustainable and don't subject the child to hardship when with the other parent (e.g. many divorcing parents fail to realize that maintaining two households will result in more child related expenses than one).

Not exact matches

Children from Mexico and Canada, on the other hand, can be subject to «voluntary repatriation» within 72 hours of their capture, so long as an immigration officer finds that they were not the subject of a «severe form of trafficking in persons» and do not have a basis to claim asylum.

According to the IRS, «payments for the services of a child under age 18 who works for his or her parent in a trade or business are not subject to social security and Medicare taxes if the trade or business is a sole proprietorship or a partnership in which each partner is a parent of the child.»

The operator of an Internet Web site that posts casting advertisements shall not post the advertisement of a person subject to paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) unless the person has provided information to the operator to establish that the person is the recipient of a valid Child Performer Services Permit, including a permit number and a form of identification to verify that the person is the recipient.

Many could not even find a place to live where their children would not be subject to harassment.

There's an excellent book, «The Children Are Free» can't remember the author, that is an excellent work of scholarship on the subject.

So, all of you that have the nerve to bad - mouth the Lord and the existance of His Kingdom... you might want to research a bit on the subject of «generational curses» because if not for yourselves, for the sake of your children and there children, you might want to know for certain Who or What you're talking about just in case.

The 10 commandments don't touch on the subjects of rape, slavery or child abuse... why not?

Instead, why don't you teach your children to study hard and get a good education at a «real» college where they can learn «real» subjects like biology and astrophysics, instead of relying on a priest or a minister to teach them that mythical being created man and the universe?

There are reports of OFSTED inspectors demanding that schools impose a weird agenda on children, teaching that it is possible for a boy to become a girl and vice versa, that sexual identity is not something specific, that all our knowledge of biology on this subject has been wrong.

Romans 8:20 - 22 — For the creation was subjected to futility, not willingly, but because of Him who subjected it, in hope that the creation itself also will be set free from its slavery to corruption into the freedom of the glory of the children of God.

because parents dunk their child's head in water with a witch doctor present doesn't mean their dead body should be subjected to more silly religious ritual.

Not sure God would appreciate you joking on such a subject, truth is you got it wrong so you said it was only a joke, similar to what a child would do

The quotation from Romans 8 on the project's homepage — «For the creation waits with eager longing for the revealing of the children of God; for the creation was subjected to futility, not of its own will but by the will of the one who subjected it, in hope that the creation itself will be set free from its bondage to decay and will obtain the freedom of the glory of the children of God» — really is central to the biblical picture of redemption and really has been neglected in both theory and practice.

8 With respect to those who refuse to accept Castilian sovereignty and the Christian faith the document includes this clause: «If you do not do it... with the help of God I will use all my power against you and will battle you everywhere and in every possible way, and you will be subject to the yoke and obedience of the Church and their Highnesses, and I will take your people and your women and children, and make them slaves, and as much I will send them, and I will inflict on you all the harm and damage possible.»

But I do not have an open mind on the subject, and don't see how any decent person can in light of the widespread misery caused by «pro-lifers» and their campaign to force unwanted children into the world.

A wise interpreter would set this verse aside as too vague and unclear on this particular issue and seek Biblical truth on this subject in the clear passages throughout the Bible that teach that God does not hold children to account for the sins of their parents!

But don't they all have to do with how we relate to each other and to Jesus Christ — whether we relate vertically as child to parent, as serf to free person, as baron to king, as alien to citizen, as tribal member to colonial usurper, as subject - wife to master - husband, as Third World country to powerful nation, as sharecropper to landed gentry, as migrant laborer to union or employer, as novice nun to mother superior, as female to male, as poor parishioner to monsignor - pastor, and on and on; or whether we relate horizontally as the grown - up heir now equal to his father, as world citizen to world citizen, as worker to worker, as minister to minister, as partner wife to partner husband, as sister to sister, and sister to brother?

I can't believe people would subject their own children to the brainwashing that takes place there.

Wayne C. Lusvardi is right to underscore that certain things» unborn children, for instance, or body parts, or drugs» shouldn't be subject to the logic of choice that prevails in a free market.

Your comment indicates that you don't understand evolution and would have benefited from more teaching on the subject as a child.

Does the fact that the humaneness of bonded child labor, often tied to the caste system, is disputed within India mean that «no unifying demands» should be placed on that country to halt the practice, or that India should not pass laws on the subject (as it has) until its citizenry is of a common moral mind?

If a man does not know raping a child is wrong, why should take him seriously on any subject, most of all the word of God?

It isn't long before somebody is asked to organize activities for the children, snacks for the children, then somebody doesn't like the subject matter of the adult study, somebody says it's going on too long, too short, and where's the music, we need somebody to play guitar, and who's going to organize the prayer at the end, and why do the children interrupt us all the time when we're trying to talk to God?

Religion and morality are NOT synonymous, but unfortunately that fallacy is perpetuated and passed on from parent to child as the parent subjects their child to the same brainwashing indoctrination they themselves suffered through as a child and who now actually think that what they believe is actually what THEY believe, rather than what somebody else believed and told them they must as well, or else.

So, off the subject of Gods great plan for Brenda... isn't anyone troubled by the fact that this couple need to have so many children?

I had to grow up and be an adult... not the dependent child, the subject of a relegated religion, and not even the middle manager of my spiritual life.

Understandably, emotions run high in discussions about gun control, in part because it's a horrifying subject — we're talking while parents are mourning their dead children, a reality we can't forget at any point.

They would also like atheist children to be subjected to prayer in school, and have added «under God» to the pledge of allegiance, a phrase that was NOT in the original pledge.

The having children comment I made is irrelevant to the subject, so I am not sure why you included it.

So a person's ability or desire to produce a child affects whether or not they can have an opinion on a subject regarding children?

I would not expect you to retain any faith because you were subjected to education, training or catechism as child, since those are externally applied.

«Government has no right to force subjects on any Nigerian child neither does it have the authority to drop Christian Religious Studies at the Senior Secondary School level while asking him / her to continue to read Islamic Studies which he / she can not do at university level.»

Children should not be subject to religious programming.

No other subject on the curriculum would be allowed to get away with this inexcusable error which insults children, not just since there is a basic mistake of mathematics, but because no actual verifiable figures are provided — anything will do in a book about RE.

Filling a young mind with such nonsense, and worse, uprooting thier lives, subjecting them to the criticism of their peers, abandoning their futures, and in some cases, abusing them by telling them «they will not be saved», is beyond the pale and to me, boarders on child abuse.

For the Creation was subjected to futility, not willingly, but because of him who subjected it, in hope that the creation itself will be set free from its bondage to corruption and obtain the freedom of the glory of the children of God.»

Young children can not be subjected to the «vagaries of individual teachers» if a social group is to survive.

I can not and will never believe in a «God» that would allow children to be molested, the holocaust to happen, genocide to happen, or anything that would hurt his «subjects» and to say that its a learning thing for us to overcome or that he does nt want to get directly involved in our lives, this can only be perceived as utterly rediculous and I still can not understand how people follow a invisible person so blindly.

What's interesting is that though both these reports by independent and secular organisations (NSPCC and JJC) either state or imply that child sex abuse is part of a problem in society as a whole and not a particular problem for the Catholic Church, in other words that Catholic priests are no more likely than anyone else to be involved in it, Dr Pravin Thevathasan, the author of the third document on this subject published around the same time, «The Catholic Church & the Sex Abuse Crisis», published by the CTS, is not inclined to deploy this fact to get the Church off the hook.

In this essay, I have referred only to the book of Genesis and thus have chosen not to mention the prohibitions against homosexuality included in Leviticus, for it seems to me that what is at stake now is not homosexuality, which is a fact, a reality, whatever my view of it as a rabbi might be, but the risk of irreversibly scrambling genealogies, questions of legal and social status (the child - as - subject becoming child - as - object), and identities — a confusion that would be harmful to society as a whole and that would lose sight of the general interest in seeking the advantage of a tiny minority.

«The decision to have or not have children is, at some important level, no longer a matter of God or nature, but has been made subject to human will and technical expertise.»

My and my children's legal right not to be subjected to a local dominant religion's practices or beliefs.

The child is not an object of rights but a subject of rights.

Men do not have ANYTHING that provides a child sustenence... what you refer to is used for $ ex and elimination of waste, so not even the same subject at all.

I'm sorry, this isn't the most enjoyable subject material, but if you're a mum or dad with school aged children, you may already be familiar with this unsavoury situation.

Child - support orders are a sore subject for the athletes hit with them, not only because they mandate large payments but also because the athletes can't control how the money is spent by the mother who receives it.