Sentences with phrase «not supernatural way»

Not exact matches

It's made me more comfortable that I don't need a supernatural explanation for the way things are.»

Don't be too upset with people for being this way — it takes a supernatural force to overcome the natural desire to lash out when you feel you've been shown up in some way.

I didn't have much place in my atheistic worldview for his claims of the supernatural, but the way he navigated conversation caught my attention.

By the way, atheists are not idolitors because that would involve supernatural belief in an idol.

This does not deny that there is also a natural order of causation, but the fullest explanation in natural terms does not in any way affect the need for understanding the whole network of natural causes as wholly dependent for its being and preservation upon a supernatural cause.

Supernatural personal experiences with an invisible elusive ent.ity that hasn't been able to, or doesn't want to assist with the human condition in a way that actually works is a non-issue and has no relevance in a discussion on truth and definitely non on peace.

How can you tell that this isn't just a delusion, like the ways that other religions appear to be tapping into the supernatural?

In other ways, the supernatural is not a surprise to people living in Islamic countries.

This is wrong: (1) it might not be possible to «judge» human laws in a supernatural way, especially when the supernatural hasn't been shown to exist; (2) we as humans judge human laws all the time — we do it through philosophy, political science, and economics, for instance.

the belief on the existence of the devil was concieved by theologians of the past thousands of years, there was no other way of explaining the bad experiences of people in the past because we were not educated yet to the kind of what we have now, Why this happened because that was part of the learning process that God wants us to know, in pathrotheism, we are part of God, and He himself is evolving because He is the universe, We are now the conscious part of Him, our destiny in accordance to his will also be His destiny because it is His will.Although He prepared first all the material reality of the universe ahead of us, The experiences for us humans including the supernatural is just part of nirmal process for learning because its natural process, today we reach a point of not believing the practices of the past, but it does not mean its wrong, Just like a child, adults loved to tell mythical stories to them, because we knew children enjoys it as part of their learning process.

(maybe a supernatural power but I know it's not some sandal footed guy who was magically created by this superfly guy who sent part of himself our way about what 2K + years ago)..

That way i can make sure I just wasn't just feeling some biochemical reaction rather then something supernatural.

Can someone explain to me why, in 25 years as a bible believer, I can not point to one single instance where God OBVIOUSLY, in a natural or supernatural way, acted in my life?

Believing that ritualistic superst!tions (praying in a specified manner, washing a certain way, visiting a holy shrine, bowing to an imaginary supernatural being, etc.) will somehow magically convince this super-being to * do * anything is simply not the truth; then going one step further and proclaiming that these beliefs are the * only * way or we will suffer eternal damnation.

While Maritain sadly failed to go all the way with de Lubac in refusing pure nature, he still opposed Maurras, not only in the name of «the primacy of the spiritual» but also of an «integral humanism» for which the free and natural spheres of politics and culture must be oriented toward supernatural grace if they are to be fully human, just, and legitimate.

«When you get to this ragged edge of Christianity when people say «God» they sort of mean «the universe» and when they say «Jesus» they sort of mean «redemption» — they're so progressive they don't actually count on any supernatural stuff to happen, they've dialed it down in the same way I did.»

An atheist, by the way, is simply someone who does not believe in a supernatural being.

For theology, clinging desperately to the supernatural as its only way of keeping God, had fought against one realm of law after another, even fighting the law of gravitation, until, beaten everywhere else, it was left with comets as about the only things that had not been captured by law.

That is far from «proven» and possibly is not «provable» in any normal way, as it is supposedly «supernatural».

Obviously on one hand, some see it as a supernatural (which doesn't mean «ghosts / spooky» but «beyond known natural occurrences / laws» event, while others see it as within the natural phenomenon, but in some way directly addressed to their specific need.

In rejecting the notion of «the supernatural» as meaning that which «in itself» is wholly prior or other in being than «the natural,» a naturalistic view does not necessarily deny that there is a being such as God, but only that way of categorizing such a being.

= > Now, within the scientific community it is a death sentence to call that which is known to exist God or supernatural so that which even science knows to exist is covered up with «we don't know» while all evidence to date confirms it is unknowable and remains so to this day as man can not know the mind of God and mans ways are not God's ways.

it's no good saying he moves in mysterious ways or that he has purposes that are opaque to us because that kind of evasion is predicate on the assumption that the person espousing this knows more than I do about the supernatural but I haven't yet met anyone that does have a private line to the creator and neither have you.

... and just because there may be no way to test a supernatural claim — doesn't give that claim an ounce of validity.

We need not go so far as to say with the author whom I lately quoted that any persistent enthusiasm is, as such, religion, nor need we call mere laughter a religious exercise; but we must admit that any persistent enjoyment may produce the sort of religion which consists in a grateful admiration of the gift of so happy an existence; and we must also acknowledge that the more complex ways of experiencing religion are new manners of producing happiness, wonderful inner paths to a supernatural kind of happiness, when the first gift of natural existence is unhappy, as it so often proves itself to be.

Truth is neither side can prove anything either way in reapect, and since science must jump off at the supernatural (that outside of known natural laws) they can't automatically discount those that have had religious experiences that give certain individuals logical reasoning based off their faith inter purely of natural experiences.

Science deals with natural (not supernatural) causes and, as such, has several ways of exploring where the «something» came from.

I couldn't help but think that the way Lifeforce was combining science fiction with the supernatural with apocalyptic elements that it was just a ripoff of John Carpenter's Prince of Darkness.

As I speculated last year in this detailed breakdown, I'm guessing there won't be much in the way of direct connections to the Clover - verse in Overlord, but I'd put money on Tagruato being involved in some capacity with the Nazis» supernatural schemes.

By far the game's best expansion, not only does it introduce creepy new supernatural foes, the distancing effect of the supernatural setting allows the story to discuss the consequences of violence and long - term effects of the Mafia lifestyle in a way the main story never attempts to.

While it still looks like television in that ineffable over-sharp, slightly over-lit way (a funny thing to say considering the literal darkness of the series, but Vancouver isn't the best place for supernatural murk; ditto L.A.), it looks like expensive television.

Rather than revel in the visual effects and the enticing magical possibilities of the supernatural, the movie suggests that whether or not Carol is really haunted, violence and abuse have a way of echoing through people's lives and experiences.

This year alone, they released six of the most inventive, quality offerings out there: two terrifying survival thrillers, Damien Power's devastating and brilliant Killing Ground and Sam Patton's lesser but still - worthy Desolation; Sean Byrne's masterful tale of artistic obsession and satanic possession The Devil's Candy (all three even harder to endure because the featured families in peril are so human and likable); A Dark Song, an unnerving occult thriller in which a woman hires a medium to help make contact with her dead daughter; and House on Willow Street, which, similar to last year's horror highlight Don't Breathe, sees a house robbery — led by a woman with a mission, played by modern scream - queen Sharni Vinson — go terrible wrong, but this time in a more supernatural way.

I am not sure yet how to do this and which way to go, but the general idea is to create a signature look for the series to allow easy identification of the «Jason Dark supernatural mysteries.»

Though I'm pleased to report that this is a mildly fun supernatural detective series in a not - quite - as - good - as - Tokyo - Bablyon sort of way, the question you may be asking is, «What on earth does it have to do with Sherlock Holmes?»

Again the XBO has way more apps, but many are TV apps, and if you don't care about TV, like I don't, to being with then these apps aren't a big deal, although I just downloaded the CW app (Supernatural and hopefully Flash are my shows for this season).

Mythogeography does not give privilege to any one part of the overall concept in the way that psychogeography favors the supernatural aspect.

Sceptics have interpreted this supernatural reference as a convenient alibi, a way of deflecting attention from a compulsion she could not control, yet which remained indispensable to her life.

You don't need strict belief in any supernatural being to «act in the world» in the way you want to, while following a set of «be good to each other» axioms (I'm an Atheist too, btw).

Dismissal of the supernatural has not got to be a very satisfying way to live your life.

As for supernatural happening since then, there is only one way to tell if they are possible or not, and that is if they happened or not, based on the evidence they happened, witnesses, physical evidence, that sort of thing.

Conclusion, there is no way to say the supernatural, or God, does not exist, there is at least some evidence that suggests that it does exist, thus it is perfectly allowable for Mockton of Brenchley to mention God if he wishes.