Sentences with phrase «not supine»

What behind the scences influences peddling has forced them to row back from that statement to the anodyne if not supine, mealy mouthed; -

Not exact matches

A tradition of local governance that resists both a supine dependence on Washington, D.C. or dominance by remote corporate interests; a patriotism that believes in the noble possibilities of the American experiment; vibrant churches and church leaders who remind us that life is more than our economic or political self - interest» it's not surprising that Lauck finds these features of Dakota life attractive.

But the important matter is that Israel's conscience did not lie supine under these conditions.

This was not about such a moment but about nine years of attempting to resurrect something both special and normal; a protest march, inspired in the specific by a series of atrocious decisions by a supine governing body, but in the abstract by a culture that prioritises the needs of the owners over the fans, that listens to money over love, and that works not for us but for them.

Two supine attempts to clear the ball from Song and Koscileny led to own goals, and while Arsenal were unlucky that Yakubu wasn't flagged offside for Blackburn's third goal, it wouldn't have been an issue if they had dealt with the initial corner played into the box.

I «m not a United fan, but if I «d spent my hard - earned on this away trip, witnessing such a supine performance by players earning up to # 300k per week, I would have been seriously pissed - off.

This is another safety danger because newborns that can roll might not be able to roll themselves back into the safe supine sleeping position.

It is for this reason, I even recommend mothers breastfeed their infant in an upright or prone position, but not while the infant is in a supine position.

Finally, supine sleeping is not a guarantee against SIDS since some infants succumb in the supine position as well.

Positional plagiocephaly, or plagiocephaly without synostosis (PWS), can be associated with supine sleeping position (OR: 2.5).113 It is most likely to result if the infant's head position is not varied when placed for sleep, if the infant spends little or no time in awake, supervised tummy time, and if the infant is not held in the upright position when not sleeping.113, — , 115 Children with developmental delay and / or neurologic injury have increased rates of PWS, although a causal relationship has not been demonstrated.113, 116, — , 119 In healthy normal children, the incidence of PWS decreases spontaneously from 20 % at 8 months to 3 % at 24 months of age.114 Although data to make specific recommendations as to how often and how long tummy time should be undertaken are lacking, supervised tummy time while the infant is awake is recommended on a daily basis.

Supine sleeping position does not cause clinical aspiration in neonates in hospital newborn nurseries

Supine (or laying flat on the back) is not only better for motor development than a fully supported semi-reclined position, it limits baby's view to the sky or ceiling (as opposed to a busy city street or crowded shop) and puts the caregivers face easily within view.

Furthermore, although we did not ask about position found on awakening, almost all infants placed supine and prone for sleep are found in the same position when waking up.9

Because one of the barriers to the use of nonprone sleep positions has been the belief that infants sleep better prone, 4,5,7 it is noteworthy that sleep problems were not more frequent in infants sleeping in the supine position at any age and, in fact, were significantly less frequent at 6 months.

Compared with infants sleeping in the prone position, infants sleeping in the supine and side positions were not at increased risk for an outpatient visit for any reason (Table 4).

This doesn't make a lot of sense to laboring moms since it's excruciating to be stuck supine, especially with a baby who's not in an optimal position.

Referrals to craniofacial centers for evaluation of deformational plagiocephaly and brachycephaly are increasing.8 This increase in deformations has been temporally linked to the Back to Sleep program advanced by the American Academy of Pediatrics in 1992 that advises the avoidance of the prone sleeping position as a method of reducing the rates of sudden infant death syndrome.10,, 12,13 There is a delay in early gross motor milestones in children forced to sleep supine but these delays seem transient and have not been linked as yet to any longer term problems.14 Children who are encouraged to sleep on their backs and develop abnormal head shapes as a result are a different population than children who spontaneously restricted their movement in bed for one reason or another.

«Interestingly, however, while supine [on the back] positioning has been a well - established risk factor for the development of plagiocephaly, we were not able to demonstrate a logical correlation to indicate more severe flattening from the supine position.»

However, that being said - I do believe there is something quite true about the research on incline (or simply NOT being supine to sleep) and the fact that babies are not in stationary supine positions while developing inuteNOT being supine to sleep) and the fact that babies are not in stationary supine positions while developing inutenot in stationary supine positions while developing inutero.

My recommendation to you is this - if your hospital staff are some of those 50 % who are not placing your baby supine («back to sleep») when it seems they should be, mention it to them, ask them why.

Thank you again for your information about sitting, I do sit her in my lap often so we will do more of that so she isn't always in a supine / prone position.

A study of infants in England indicated that supine sleeping is not associated with an increase in significant morbidity outcomes, and the risk of respiratory problems was reduced compared with that of prone sleepers.17 In Asian countries, aspiration is not a problem despite the traditional practice of placing newborns to sleep in the supine position.18 The review by Malloy19 of US vital statistics mortality files for the years 1991 to 1996 showed no significant increase in the proportion of postneonatal mortality rate associated with aspiration, asphyxia, or respiratory failure.

Supine Sleeping Position Does Not Cause Clinical Aspiration in Neonates in Hospital Newborn Nurseries.

Despite the simplicity and effectiveness of the supine sleep position in lowering SIDS risk, 24.4 % of care providers do not regularly place infants on their backs to sleep.22 Use of the prone sleep position remains highest in care providers who are young, black, or of low income or who have low educational attainment.

When prone vs. supine sleep was first studied in the 70s and 80s, when lots of babies were sleeping prone, the ORs for SIDS and prone sleep weren't really that high (though significant).

We hypothesized that normal newborns would not have frequent clinically significant episodes of aspiration while in the supine position in the first 24 hours of life.

The study showed that infants sleeping supine did not have an increase in cyanosis, pallor, or breathing problems at 1 month of age.

Stastny and coworkers12 showed that fear of aspiration was the primary reason that hospital newborn nursery nurses did not place infants in the supine position.

We speculate that placing newborns in the supine position to sleep does not cause clinical aspiration.

Concerns about gastric aspiration in normal newborns sleeping in the supine position are not supported by this study.

If it was determined that clinically significant aspiration occurs infrequently while supine, this should reassure nursery nurses that supine sleeping in newborns is safe and that it does not increase the risk of aspiration.

Despite this, many nursery nurses do not follow the supine sleep recommendations.

Physiologic studies also have shown that healthy infants are able to protect their airways and do not have increased apnea when placed supine.20 Meyers and Herbst21 showed that the amount of gastroesophageal reflux in healthy patients was not significantly affected by changes in sleep position.

Byard and Beal14 did not find cases of significant gastric aspiration in infants who were lying on their sides or supine.

Maternal advisors have always said that pregnant women should not sleep in a supine position (on your back) because of potential heart compression and other problems, but there was little known about the impact of women who sleep in the prone position (on your stomach) because it was simply not an option.

For instance, it has been suggested that the physical restraint associated with swaddling may prevent infants placed supine from rolling to the prone position.299 One study's results suggested a decrease in SIDS rate with swaddling if the infant was supine, 182 but it was notable that there was an increased risk of SIDS if the infant was swaddled and placed in the prone position.182 Although a recent study found a 31-fold increase in SIDS risk with swaddling, the analysis was not stratified according to sleep position.171 Although it may be more likely that parents will initially place a swaddled infant supine, this protective effect may be offset by the 12-fold increased risk of SIDS if the infant is either placed or rolls to the prone position when swaddled.182, 300 Moreover, there is no evidence that swaddling reduces bed - sharing or use of unsafe sleep surfaces, promotes breastfeeding, or reduces maternal cigarette smoking.

Back to sleep for every sleep — To reduce the risk of SIDS, infants should be placed for sleep in a supine position (wholly on the back) for every sleep by every caregiver until 1 year of life.3, — , 7 Side sleeping is not safe and is not advised.4, 6

Elevating the head of the infant's crib while the infant is supine is not recommended.11 It is ineffective in reducing gastroesophageal reflux; in addition, it might result in the infant sliding to the foot of the crib into a position that might compromise respiration.

Finally, and perhaps most importantly, if parents observe health care professionals placing infants in the side or prone position, they are likely to infer that supine positioning is not important110 and, therefore, might be more likely to copy this practice and use the side or prone position at home.77, 80,111 The AAP recommends that infants be placed on their backs as soon as they are ready to be placed in a bassinet.

Elevating the head of the infant's crib while the infant is supine is not effective in reducing gastroesophageal reflux85, 86; in addition, this elevation can result in the infant sliding to the foot of the crib into a position that might compromise respiration and, therefore, is not recommended.

The supine sleep position does not increase the risk of choking and aspiration in infants, even those with gastroesophageal reflux, because they have protective airway mechanisms.8, 9 Infants with gastroesophageal reflux should be placed for sleep in the supine position for every sleep, with the rare exception of infants for whom the risk of death from complications of gastroesophageal reflux is greater than the risk of SIDS (ie, those with upper airway disorders, for whom airway protective mechanisms are impaired), 10 including infants with anatomic abnormalities such as type 3 or 4 laryngeal clefts who have not undergone antireflux surgery.

Cobedding of twins and other infants of multiple gestation is a frequent practice, both in the hospital setting and at home.174 However, the benefits of cobedding twins and higher - order multiples have not been established.175, — , 177 Twins and higher - order multiples are often born prematurely and with low birth weight, so they are at increased risk of SIDS.101, 102 Furthermore, there is increased potential for overheating and rebreathing while cobedding, and size discordance might increase the risk of accidental suffocation.176 Most cobedded twins are placed on their sides rather than supine.174 Finally, cobedding of twins and higher - order multiples in the hospital setting might encourage parents to continue this practice at home.176 Because the evidence for the benefits of cobedding twins and higher - order multiples is not compelling and because of the increased risk of SIDS and suffocation, the AAP believes that it is prudent to provide separate sleep areas for these infants to decrease the risk of SIDS and accidental suffocation.

Despite these recommendations, the prevalence of supine positioning has remained stagnant for the last decade.71 One of the most common reasons that parents and caregivers cite for not placing infants supine is fear of choking or aspiration in the supine position.72, — , 80 Parents often misconstrue coughing or gagging, which is evidence of a normal protective gag reflex, for choking or aspiration.

Multiple studies in different countries have not found an increased incidence of aspiration since the change to supine sleeping.81, — , 83 There is often particular concern for aspiration when the infant has been diagnosed with gastroesophageal reflux.

The AAP supports the recommendations of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, which state that infants with gastroesophageal reflux should be placed for sleep in the supine position, with the rare exception of infants for whom the risk of death from gastroesophageal reflux is greater than the risk of SIDS84 — specifically, infants with upper airway disorders for whom airway protective mechanisms are impaired, which may include infants with anatomic abnormalities, such as type 3 or 4 laryngeal clefts, who have not undergone antireflux surgery.

The other reason often cited by parents for not using the supine sleep position is the perception that the infant is uncomfortable or does not sleep well.72, — , 80 An infant who wakes frequently is normal and should not be perceived as a poor sleeper.

This reported intolerance was consistent with the Salls et al15 study, as well as the Davis et al14 study, where the authors indicated that many of the infants who slept in the supine position did not want to be placed in the prone position while awake.

Upon realising that the vote meant that he would not be questioned on the budget, Johnson referred to his political opponents as «great supine protoplasmic invertebrate jellies».

Decisions are not made by Parliament but by «clowns pretending to be ministers» who are just «apologists for the quango state», whilst 7 out of 10 MPs effectively have a «job for life» because of an electoral system which allows the party hierarchy to award to the most supine and obedient of its members with safe seats.

Supine bluegrass, for example, may not be green enough for some grass connoisseurs.