Sentences with phrase «not take on your case»

In some cases airlines have apparently referred passengers to an ADR scheme which then says it can't take on their case because the route is outside its jurisdiction.
The purpose of a Conflicts Information Specialist is to ensure that lawyers do not take on cases which create a conflict of interest with any current or previous work by other lawyers.
That space between motive and incentive can create some cognitive dissonance for those lawyers who can't take on the cases they'd like to tackle, particularly if it's a question of the would - be client's inability to pay; or...
When after a summary consultation with a potential client you determine that you can not take on a case because s / he can not afford the costs, consider providing a summary document from the consultation, at no additional cost.
That space between motive and incentive can create some cognitive dissonance for those lawyers who can't take on the cases they'd like to tackle, particularly if it's a question of the would - be client's inability to pay; or the fear that the return would not justify the investment of the lawyer's time.
Whilst we may choose to pass on compensation we may receive from carriers, as we are not part of the scheme the ADR provider would not take on a case for any failure on our part to pay out under the scheme.

Not exact matches

In some cases, when employees aren't behind the wheel it allows for more time to take calls, work on projects, check email or simply relax.
Many small business owners think that they have to take on all of the major tasks and responsibilities themselves but that is not the case.
I see this in cases where sometimes board members don't want to take on the «Pottery Barn Rule» that if you break it, you fix it.
In most cases, we hone the skills that society smiles on, taking jobs because we don't want people to judge us or because others want us in specific roles.
JAB's strategy has not involved massive management restructuring and taking on leverage, as is sometimes the case with private equity buyouts.
Normally many of the object - oriented programming languages clean up for you because they notice when you are running low on memory and haven't used a bit of code in a while, but in the case of these terascale systems, it would be like having a kitchen the size of a football field, so by the time you ran out of room, it would take weeks to clean it up.
While it might be appropriate in some cases to take on the assignment regardless, generally you'll feel better about yourself over the long run if you stick to your guns and don't allow yourself to lower your price.
That was true no matter how long the participants took to respond, so it wasn't the case that those with a lot on their minds were simply slower to come up with answers.
It's also not always the case that renters have to take on roommates because of budgetary constraints.
Successfully responding to these maddening critiques takes time and energy that could be better spent on, well, anything else, and in many cases, not a little self - abnegation.
Again, in case you don't want to take my word on this, here are some articles you can read that support this point:
It doesn't take much to see how that could have led to rules that'd apply the same standards across the board — only, in that case, it would've had the side effect of bolstering online privacy on all sides.
Fortunately, in most cases (we hope for your business), you can rely on an accountant who isn't cooking the books, or taking chances when he or she shouldn't.
It all suggests that the dramatic day and a half of legal proceedings are but a prelude to even more courtroom theatrics and combat in what has become a sordid, long - standing matter (for the full saga, read the Disturbing Decline of Sumner Redstone) that reflects poorly on countless participants, not least the boards of CBS and Viacom, which took no action to remove Redstone as their executive chairman until Herzer's case forced their hand.
At the New York Times, Andrew Ross Sorkin took on those who say Tillerson is dodging a huge tax bill, with a headline that declared: «That's not the case
«This won't be a speech about specifics but instead about the case that we have to get growth faster and wages faster and get people to focus on that and the impact on workers» take - home pay,» a senior White House official said.
An IPO, in case you haven't learned about the specifics, yet, occurs when a formerly private business decides to take on outside investors, either by having the founders sell some of their shares or by issuing new shares to raise money for expansion, while, at the same time, listing those shares on a stock exchange or an over-the-counter market.
I hesitate to take much solace in that, and in any case, we wouldn't act on any signal that was not also accompanied by favorable trend uniformity.
In the case of Facebook, it's not what you share with whom when you are on the site or the apps and quizzes you take that are the only issues; they form just a small part of what you are giving up.
Anyway, what the article takes an awful long time getting around to — after twice saying the question they pose isn't so outlandish or premature and that the recent volatility shows how jittery people are AND pointing out that the tax plan and increased spending «boxed» the economy into a corner against the chance for stimulus in case we have a recession — is this: It's going to be hard on people.
If you really can't be bothered to go and hunt down and switch off every location setting one fairly crude action you can take is to buy a faraday cage carry case — Silent Pocket makes an extensive line of carry cases with embedded wireless shielding tech, for instance — which you can pop your smartphone into when you're on the move to isolate it from the network.
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) lets business owners take a deduction on interest from business loans, but this is not the case with personal loans.
But Levandowski, asserting his Fifth Amendment right to avoid self - incrimination, has not publicly denied taking the files or otherwise commented on the case.
If that's the case and you'd rather double down on growing your business by not taking out extra working capital — by all means!
If that's the case then the portfolio's asset allocation reflects the fact that you can take more risk on the equity side — in the hope of better returns — as long as you're not banking on those returns to enable you to live.
We always have to justify the risk we are taking on any one trade, that's how you should think about every trade you take; justify the money you are laying on the line, and if you can't make a good case for risking that money given the setup and market structure, then don't take the trade.
Last year I wrote on Suven Life Sciences, also I did some secondary level maths to get a sense of returns an investor could get buying the business at then market cap (~ 2000 INR Crores or 400 Million USD) and exiting in 2024 See Snap shot below The base case CAGR didn't excite but reading management commentary compelled me to take a tracking position in model portfolio Over to this year One thing in AR gave me a Jeff Bezos moment For the first time management was sounding optimistic (this is coming from a management which is very conservative on record) Emphasis mine Management views on past Despite having grown the business every single year across the last five years, our business sustainability has been consistently questioned.
Many shares, likes, links — the reality is this is probably not always the case, and much of this preconditioning comes from game theory and also a «groupthink» type efficiency, where the market will take on the link building focus of other players in the vertical, creating asynchronous link building profiles in style and aptitude.
To direct his National Economic Council, meanwhile, Trump has nominated Larry Kudlow, who also proposed a wildly optimistic take on stock prices back then, in his case a prediction that the Dow Jones Industrial Average would go to 50,000 by 2020... Kudlow, the more interesting of Trump's Dow dreamers, didn't seem to be chastened by this experience; he went on to a career as a TV business commentator, delivering an amazing series of bum steers as the years rolled by.
There is assumption that part of this growth can be reflected in exports, but if that is not the case, Iceland is insisting on «conditionalities» of its own to take its actual balance - of - payments position into account.
Upon returning to the workforce, Cheryl took the steps necessary to become a licensed financial services professional and quickly realized the vast majority of current and prospective retirees did not have access to the advice and resources required to make an educated decision on, what in most cases, will prove to be one of the most critical financial decisions they'll ever make; when and how to claim Social Security retirement benefits.
You are right that coping mechanism is indiviualistic based on each one's emotional strength, good for yu that taking a walk in the park helped, it does not in most cases when the person you most deeply loved is gone.
In any case, I think it's easier to attack Lutz's person than to take on his message (hypocritical or not) because it would require some of us to change ourselves.
What will it take to get it through your head that all of your explanations are premised on the assumption that there is a God, which you have failed to demonstrate is the case, and many of them are premised on the assumption that the Christian narrative is the correct one, which you also can't demonstrate to be the case.
«I observe with particular pleasure the view you have taken of the immunity of Religion from civil jurisdiction, in every case where it does not trespass on private rights or the public peace.
I concluded at the time of the riots that of all the things the government now needed to do, it was the married family which most urgently needed to be rebuilt: I was and remain as certain of that as anything I have ever written, and I have been saying it repeatedly for over 20 years: I was saying it, for instance, when I was attacking (in The Mail and also The Telegraph), as it went through the Commons, the parliamentary bill which became that disastrous piece of (Tory) legislation called the Children Act 1989, which abolished parental rights (substituting for them the much weaker «parental responsibility»), which encouraged parents not to spend too much time with their children, which even, preposterously, gave children the right to take legal action against theirparents for attempting to discipline them, which made it «unlawful for a parent or carer to smack their child, except where this amounts to «reasonable punishment»;» and which specified that «Whether a «smack» amounts to reasonable punishment will depend on the circumstances of each case taking into consideration factors like the age of the child and the nature of the smack.»
Insurance companies are well aware of the phenomenon in which people who take out insurance against, say, burglary, are known (on average if not in every case) to modify their behaviour so that the risk of being burgled increases.
It is not the judges right or duty to express his personal opinions or beliefs while sitting on the bench, especially while giving a verdict.Judges are there to make sure due process and a fair and impartial hearing or trial takes place for all those involved.this particular judge's rant on the muslim world based on his views from serving in the military had absolutely no bearing on the case and should not have even been brought up much less used to chastise the victim with.
In such cases, we should not rush in headlong and so firmly take our stand on one side that, if further progress in the search for truth justly undermines our position, we too fall with it.»
To the contrary, a teleological ethic may imply that at least some cases should not be separately taken, precisely for the reasons on which the criticism depends.
And in any such case, it then becomes the interactions which experience has shown will have an impact on the molecule which controls the shape it takes and not anything intrinsic to the molecule considered in itself, or explained simply by the quantum mechanics of its constituents.
Scientists wouldn't be able to send spacecraft to find out if there was life on the planets because in the best case scenario, it would take 39 years just to get there.
In America many Christians who insist on a literal interpretation of anything in the Bible are often ready to say «but, in this case, Jesus didn't really mean...» when both Jesus and the author of this Gospel labor to convey «You aren't supposed to try to take the live of other things on Earth... that's the whole point, I want you to take on life that only I can offer!»
Such crime if it took place any where in our Islamic lands and was caught for the crime... he will be torn to pieces there and then with out trial since trials are supposed for those who are suspected and not proven guilty... but as a case that is as plain they should have condemned him to worst death with out any need for court trials... But by being soft on the issue and giving ear to such junk you open doors for those copycats whom seek fame... That is only fair and secure..
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z