Sentences with phrase «not take the matter to court»

It could clear the way for unions representing staff at International High School of New Orleans and teachers» aides at Lusher Charter School to begin bargaining with their respective charter boards — if the boards do not take the matter to court.

Not exact matches

It doesn't appear to matter whether you go to a food court, or an office cafeteria, or a proper sit - down restaurant, or sit on a bench with a sandwich; what matters is that you take a break.

«The Supreme Court's Catholic majority seems to think that, because many prayers before government meetings take on a ceremonial aspect, the actual content of the prayers doesn't really matter, Kagan continues.»

This was has so much hatred for a religious symbol that not only symbolizes Christianity but it is also a huge part of Italian culture that she would go as far as taking the matter to court... why is her opinion, her feelings more important than the opinion and feelings of the rest of the Italian population?

In most cases, a group of unhappy homeowners doesn't have the financial resources to take the matter to court, so they often must settle for making enough noise to gain some accommodations that will lessen the sting of having a water park, a teen center, a bike path or a major grocery store facing their back yards.

Second question: Even though this matter is in court and I don't want to go into it, the fact of the matter is that the reply, when we took the matter to court, was that the government was not involved in the demolition and they don't know who demolished the house.

It, therefore, comes as a surprise that INEC, which was a party to the matter, can not advise political parties on the right course to take but, instead, continues to encourage politicians to embark on illegal actions through active participation of its officials, who are sent to observe such illegal primaries, whereas the apex court in the land has ruled on such matter.

He told host Umaru Sanda Amadu that he had not decided on taking the matter to court but said the Attorney General could take the issue up to court to investigate and prosecute those found culpable since bribery was a criminal offence.

Paladino, who has not ruled out another run for governor, has said if he's thrown off the board, he'll take the matter to court.

We thus wish to reiterate once again that whilst we do not want to take issue with anyone on this matter as it is currently before a court of competent jurisdiction, we are, however, compelled to use the opportunity presented by Devakumar Edwin's reckless statements to clarify the cycle of misinformation being proliferated.

Both the Appeal Court and the Justice himself, should have taken cue from a similar matter involving President Jonathan which was assigned to a Judge from Bayelsa State, but the Honourable Judge disqualified himself on the ground that he may not do justice to the matter and the case was subsequently returned to the FCT Chief Judge for re-assignment to another Judge from another state.

Five providers that didn't pay the expensive licensing fees were sued by BPP in 2000 and took the matter to court.

All of this talk about Samsung being taken to court over infringing patents and copying the design of the iPhone and iPad and losing in the process, apparently doesn't matter to those wanting to make a quick buck or two.

Like all legal battles in the courts it can take months if not years to resolve the matter.

While the revenue agency has not yet taken the Donations for Canada tax shelter to court, some tax experts expect it to be just a matter of time.

Lightfoot is committed to pro bono work not just because it is the right thing to do and an essential part of our professional obligation as lawyers, but also because pro bono matters allow our new lawyers critical opportunities to take responsibility in court and with clients to gain valuable experience early in their careers.

The wife had also taken various steps to obtain temporary orders in the Ontario court, relating to custody and access, and had chosen not to start a custody case in Alberta until steps were taken to fix a trial date for the divorce and related matters in Ontario.

He told the Star that he's hearing more and more stories of it taking much longer now to schedule civil and family matters in Superior Court — cases which do not carry the same constitutional right for a trial in a reasonable time.

New York is a no - fault state, which means basically that for «non-serious» injuries, your insurance company will pay medical bills and any lost wages up to a certain amount while not allowing you to take the matter to court.

The significance of this decision, therefore, is that the Court has effectively determined that it does not matter whether or not the initial detention (and by logical extension, seizure) of the cash was lawful or not for forfeiture to take place.

Before taking new matters into account based on statistics which have not been considered in the judgment under appeal, the adversarial process requires that the court ensure that the parties are given an opportunity to deal with the new information by making further submissions, oral or written, and allowing, if requested, fresh material in response.

In the circumstances, the Court of Appeal took the view that: ``... save perhaps in exceptional circumstances, the court should not in principle grant an injunction but leave the matter to be dealt with by way of application for an ASBO.&rCourt of Appeal took the view that: ``... save perhaps in exceptional circumstances, the court should not in principle grant an injunction but leave the matter to be dealt with by way of application for an ASBO.&rcourt should not in principle grant an injunction but leave the matter to be dealt with by way of application for an ASBO.»

«Definitely, the minor stuff is going to be Small Claims Court,» he adds, noting plaintiffs take a risk that they may not get costs if the court ultimately determines it to be a small claims maCourt,» he adds, noting plaintiffs take a risk that they may not get costs if the court ultimately determines it to be a small claims macourt ultimately determines it to be a small claims matter.

Courts are utterly unqualified to determine proper diplomatic or military actions to take, or to evaluate whether the President's actions were enough to meet the requirement of «do what's necessary to restore security;» foreign policy is a case where a country needs a unified face (because other countries aren't particularly willing to deal with US internal politics), and where the courts could easily screw up what the government is doing; and whether to send Americans to war is a question that is clearly a matter for those accountable to the pCourts are utterly unqualified to determine proper diplomatic or military actions to take, or to evaluate whether the President's actions were enough to meet the requirement of «do what's necessary to restore security;» foreign policy is a case where a country needs a unified face (because other countries aren't particularly willing to deal with US internal politics), and where the courts could easily screw up what the government is doing; and whether to send Americans to war is a question that is clearly a matter for those accountable to the pcourts could easily screw up what the government is doing; and whether to send Americans to war is a question that is clearly a matter for those accountable to the people.

However, Dr Sanchez - Graells argues that when the case reaches the Supreme Court on appeal «[e] ven if the parties do not challenge or even raise to the UKSC's consideration the matter of the (ir) reversibility of an Article 50 notification, it is a logical given that the UKSC needs to take a stance on this point in order to be able to rule on the case».

You, and thousands more like you, can protest «I can't take time off work», but the odds that such a plea will matter to the court is very low: you have a duty to serve on a jury, if called.

It is important to remember that if you or the other party chooses to take a contested matter to the Court both attorneys are fired instantly and can not represent you before the cCourt both attorneys are fired instantly and can not represent you before the courtcourt.

I take leave to say that the New York statute, in the particulars here involved, can not be held to be in conflict with the Fourteenth Amendment without enlarging the scope of the Amendment far beyond its original purpose and without bringing under the supervision of this court matters which have been supposed to belong exclusively to the legislative departments of the several States when exerting their conceded power to guard the health and safety of their citizens by such regulations as they in their wisdom deem best.

Tipping J acknowledged that judicial review should not be excluded lightly by a statutory ouster clause but said that the statutory challenge proceeding «has a built - in right for the taxpayer to take the matter to the High Court, if that is thought necessary or desirable».

Instead, the majority, comprised of the Court's more conservative members, took a restrictive approach, choosing to not to make a «constitutional» case out of a matter that the Court believed was more appropriately resolved by the states.

Both mediators reportedly took the view that the privilege belonged to the parties and not to them, though the second mediator said that she would normally counsel against the parties agreeing to share such matters with the court (advice clearly not tendered in the Bournemouth airport case).

Further, the CCRC, as envisioned by the Royal Commission and established by Parliament, is not «within court structure,» and is not «empowered to take judicial decisions that are properly matters for the Court of Appeal» or «to change a decision made by a court.&rcourt structure,» and is not «empowered to take judicial decisions that are properly matters for the Court of Appeal» or «to change a decision made by a court.&rCourt of Appeal» or «to change a decision made by a court.&rcourt.»

Sight is a precious gift, so surgery in such a delicate area can cause apprehension; when these cases go wrong, or not as expected, the patient may decide to take matters to court.

How long on average it takes to complete each stage in the particular kind of matter — as well as what the short and long ends of the range might be − and whether there are delays the client should know about (for example, clients may not know that a court can reserve a decision at the end of a trial, and may be shocked that they won't know the outcome until weeks or months later);

Anybody going through such a situation should never have to fight with insurance companies, or deal with another driver who is insisting that they are not culpable for the accident, possibly threatening to take the matter in court.

The court will not take the adulterous conduct into consideration when making any other determinations relating to your matter.

In Reasons issued on behalf of a unanimous court, Justice LeBel reiterated that jurisdiction must be based upon a «real and substantial connection» between a particular forum and the subject matter of the litigation and that the determination of whether there is such a connection must not be a matter of pure judicial discretion but, rather, be based upon a clear set of presumptive factors that will be applied to whether the courts of a particular province can take jurisdiction.

Laviolette, [1996] S.J. No. 378: 10 Not only may a court take notice of what is common knowledge in the community, it may also take judicial notice of a fact or matter that may be readily determined by reference to an indisputable source.

The proposals include a power for the court to determine whether costs sanctions should be imposed for unreasonable conduct relating to ADR (such as an unreasonable refusal to mediate) not only at the end of a case, as currently, but during the matter when the decisions regarding ADR are taken.

It is a document that an employer gives their terminated employee and asks them to sign it, in which they get the employee to agree not to take the employer to court for any matter related to the termination.

We always strive to settle an injury or wrongful death claim in the most efficient way possible to recover maximum compensation, but we are not afraid to take the matter to court if necessary.

We are experienced litigators who will not hesitate to take legal matters to court.

The pledge not to take the matter to court by way of a participation agreement signed by both the lawyers and the parties;

The Court confirmed that although a landlord must have a genuine intention to carry out the scheme of works, the landlord's motive for doing so is irrelevant and it does not even matter if a landlord intends to reverse the works after it has taken back possession of the premises.

The Court of Appeal made it clear that at the time of creating the statement in February 2011, no decision to prosecute had been taken by the Health and Safety Executive and matters were still at the investigatory stage and therefore that litigation privilege did not apply.

Justice Nadon decided not to take his seat until the matter was settled, and Justice Marshall Rothstein, who had served as Nadon's colleague on the Federal Court of Appeal, recused himself.

The Court of Appeal would only interfere with the trial judge's decision if the decision was «marred by legal error, or by a failure to take relevant matters into account or it is such that the judge could not sensibly have made».

«[I] n determining whether to enforce the terms of a contract of adhesion, courts have looked not only to the take - it - or - leave - it nature or the standardized form of the document but also to -LSB-(1)-RSB- the subject matter of the contract, -LSB-(2)-RSB- the parties» relative bargaining positions, -LSB-(3)-RSB- the degree of economic compulsion motivating the «adhering» party, and -LSB-(4)-RSB- the public interests affected by the contract.»

1) the Court argument is different: it goes «If the Treaty has a rule on whether a matter is subjuct to judicial review or not, you can't take the issue outside the Treaty» - it stems from EU being not a mere Intl org (where your argument would apply) and it is more like a constitutional limitation (i.e. To modify the rule you have to change the Trety, you can't do that with an intl agreementto judicial review or not, you can't take the issue outside the Treaty» - it stems from EU being not a mere Intl org (where your argument would apply) and it is more like a constitutional limitation (i.e. To modify the rule you have to change the Trety, you can't do that with an intl agreementTo modify the rule you have to change the Trety, you can't do that with an intl agreementto change the Trety, you can't do that with an intl agreement).

In the event that the parties do not go to Providence Family Court and resolve the matter at the divorce nominal court date, then the divorce could take up to one year or potentially Court and resolve the matter at the divorce nominal court date, then the divorce could take up to one year or potentially court date, then the divorce could take up to one year or potentially more.