Sentences with phrase «not taught in the public school»

As Europeans, now naturalized U.S. citizens, they are stunned the Bible is not taught in public schools.

Religion isn't taught in public schools and to that point, neither are math and science.

To whomever said «creationism isn't taught in public schools,» I give you Tennesee, Indiana, Kansas and Texas.

It is harder to get students interested in these crucial subjects if they are not taught in the public school system.I find that very sad.

Not exact matches

According to courts can't teach ID / creationism in public schools in US.

I just don't want them teaching in my schools or being demonstrative in public with their husbands.

@ I wonder The bible can't be taught in public schools in US science can..

And I guess you «don't care» about teaching Creationism in public schools because you aren't in public school anymore.

In the question session, philosophy professor Jeff Jordan made the following observation to Dennett, «If Darwinism is inherently atheistic, as you say, then obviously it can't be taught in public schools.&raquIn the question session, philosophy professor Jeff Jordan made the following observation to Dennett, «If Darwinism is inherently atheistic, as you say, then obviously it can't be taught in public schools.&raquin public schools.»

Also courts have ruled ID / creationism can't be taught in public schools in US.

What is less clear to me is why complementarians like Keller insist that that 1 Timothy 2:12 is a part of biblical womanhood, but Acts 2 is not; why the presence of twelve male disciples implies restrictions on female leadership, but the presence of the apostle Junia is inconsequential; why the Greco - Roman household codes represent God's ideal familial structure for husbands and wives, but not for slaves and masters; why the apostle Paul's instructions to Timothy about Ephesian women teaching in the church are universally applicable, but his instructions to Corinthian women regarding head coverings are culturally conditioned (even though Paul uses the same line of argumentation — appealing the creation narrative — to support both); why the poetry of Proverbs 31 is often applied prescriptively and other poetry is not; why Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob represent the supremecy of male leadership while Deborah and Huldah and Miriam are mere exceptions to the rule; why «wives submit to your husbands» carries more weight than «submit one to another»; why the laws of the Old Testament are treated as irrelevant in one moment, but important enough to display in public courthouses and schools the next; why a feminist reading of the text represents a capitulation to culture but a reading that turns an ancient Near Eastern text into an apologetic for the post-Industrial Revolution nuclear family is not; why the curse of Genesis 3 has the final word on gender relationships rather than the new creation that began at the resurrection.

Sometimes these are people who could not pray in public and were not comfortable teaching Sunday school.

Don't like what they're teaching in public school, go to a private one or teach at home.

What must be done is to keep insisting on the right to teach the Bible as history and as literature in the public schools until this not only is permitted but becomes as widely practiced there as in the state universities.

We have laws and God told us a long time ago in His laws «Thous shalt not kill» we have to teach this in our homes, schools, public places etc. etc..

«That's why the church continues to try to block science from progressing, trying to block certain sciences in schools, and they don't teach all science in private christian schools» = > Public schools are so anti God it is pathetic you are way off on that one.

Can not teach CREATION at all in public schools as FACT.

I think some uninformed people commenting here assume that all of Christianity agree with creationism and that our position is that it should be taught in the public schools and that is not correct.

While creationism is not limited to Christianity, you are correct, there are not many Muslims pushing for creationism to be taught in public schools.

ID / creation can not be taught in public schools in US..

ben they should be taught to think for themselves in public schools not indoctrinated.

Creationism isn't even taught in public schools.

And only about one in three know that a public school teacher is allowed to teach a comparative religion class - although nine out of 10 know that teacher isn't allowed by the Supreme Court to lead a class in prayer.

Creationism isn't taught in science classes in public schools because it isn't science.

There are INFINITE alternative possibilities that have no evidence or reason to think they could be true, we can't teach them all & they have no place in public schools.

Perhaps the mass media are the real public schools — the institutions in which the public is not only taught but brought into being as a public.

That's exactly why atheists don't want believers creating laws based solely upon their beliefs, why atheists don't want those beliefs taught in schools as science, why atheists don't want those beliefs posted on public buildings, etc..

Inquisition, witch trials, laws against public office, teaching fiction as fact in public schools, etc... we can certainly handle what we're dealing with now, but we won't let it get out of hand ever again!

It's OK to teach these tenets of Islam in public schools, but don't you DARE teach the 10 Commandments or even mention the Bible.

Personally, I'm not sure I want actual religion taught in public schools.

But don't teach it in public high school science classes.

At the public charter school where she used to teach, she said, «I had a lot of students comment, «I can't really feel bad for this rich kid with a weekend free in New York City.»»

In the most recent form of this debate, the courts have ruled that Creation - Science is not science but the propagation of particular religious beliefs, and as such the mandatory requirement of it being taught in public schools violates the establishment clause of the First Amendment to the ConstitutioIn the most recent form of this debate, the courts have ruled that Creation - Science is not science but the propagation of particular religious beliefs, and as such the mandatory requirement of it being taught in public schools violates the establishment clause of the First Amendment to the Constitutioin public schools violates the establishment clause of the First Amendment to the Constitution.

If you want god in your children's classroom, send them to a school run by a religious organization... public tax dollars should not be covering the teaching of god in any form, unless the church wants to start paying taxes.

Major premise: Creationism is religion rather than science; therefore, according to the principle of separation of church and state, creationism may not be taught in public schools.

Public schools are precisely where religion should not be taught, unless in a comparative religions class.

The Church (and please note I am not saying Jesus) ordered witch - hunt for centuries to continue, the Church has been the greatest impediment to Science and Scientific Revolution, the Church wants to influence scientific teachings (as in the Creationist theory) in public schools in a secular country — hence the bashing.

It can't be taught in public, private, or so - called Christian based schools.

It should be taught in Sunday school NOT Public school!!

My opinion is if a school is being funded by the government, religion of Any type should not be taught b / c in public schools there are many different types of people who attend.

I do not know how much LGBT is involve in promoting that their life style be taught as a norm in public schools, but it is entirely unnecessary and I think can cause little kids to be very confused.

Crucifixes are all over Italy in public places and it will be hard for that person not to notice a crucifix in any public place INCLUDING the public schools there... so I don't know why this person would suddenly sue the government for having a crucifix at a walking or sitting at a PUBLIC school which does not teach religion any more than a walking at a PUBLIC pedestrian where you would probably find more crucifixes as you wapublic places and it will be hard for that person not to notice a crucifix in any public place INCLUDING the public schools there... so I don't know why this person would suddenly sue the government for having a crucifix at a walking or sitting at a PUBLIC school which does not teach religion any more than a walking at a PUBLIC pedestrian where you would probably find more crucifixes as you wapublic place INCLUDING the public schools there... so I don't know why this person would suddenly sue the government for having a crucifix at a walking or sitting at a PUBLIC school which does not teach religion any more than a walking at a PUBLIC pedestrian where you would probably find more crucifixes as you wapublic schools there... so I don't know why this person would suddenly sue the government for having a crucifix at a walking or sitting at a PUBLIC school which does not teach religion any more than a walking at a PUBLIC pedestrian where you would probably find more crucifixes as you waPUBLIC school which does not teach religion any more than a walking at a PUBLIC pedestrian where you would probably find more crucifixes as you waPUBLIC pedestrian where you would probably find more crucifixes as you walk by.

This is your standard school - type English 11 textbook, of the sort I haven't used since I taught English 11 in public school twenty - three years ago.

While some evangelical supporters of homeschooling, private school, and charter school options are celebrating a school choice advocate's appointment to this all - important role (and a graduate of the evangelical liberal arts school, Calvin College, at that), other conservative Christian public school parents and advocates are disheartened by DeVos's limited personal history with our nation's public schools (she has mentored in public schools but not attended, taught, or sent children to public schools).

According to Edward J. Larson's scholarly, informative, Pulitzer Prize - winning book, Summer for the Gods: The Scopes Trial and America's Continuing Debate Over Science and Religion, the prosecution of young John Scopes for presumedly violating a state law restricting the teaching of evolution in the public schools need not have resulted in the now legendary high - pitched standoff between the atheistic radical Clarence Darrow and the robustly religious populist William Jennings Bryan.

Only science, not religion, should be used by our political leaders and taught in our public schools in this country.

While we are not in favor of mandating that creation be taught in public school science classes, we believe that, at the very least, instructors should have the academic freedom to bring up the problems with evolution.

They teach much the same curriculum as that in the public schools, but they do not have to minimize the role of the Christian faith in history or disparage its contribution.

It wouldn't matter that they think the world is 6000 years old if they didn't demand that we teach that nonsense in public schools, with public money.

Creationism wasn't taught in any of the public schools I went to.