Sentences with phrase «not teach a value»

The author argues that the public schools ought not teach a value system and a world view contrary to the beliefs and values of the children's parents.

They learn those values and virtues during childhood — why not teach them that valuing the earth is important?

We animal lovers can spend so much time with each other, we lose sight of the fact that a whole big universe of people is out there - people who don't understand the human animal bond because they weren't taught the value of pets.

Not exact matches

Despite the existence of some brilliant books teaching us how to be a successful leader, not many of the ambitious businessmen understand the true value of management.

Its value is that it teaches not just music but also discipline, practice, cooperation, and culture.

Now this is not to say that we should assume there is no value in teaching and tradition.

She taught me values: Don't worry about appearances, or money, or any of the externals.

«With my children, I try to go out of my way to teach good values, and I think they're not spoiled kids — I hope to God you know, and all I know is I am doing the best I can — but where did they really learn those values?

Working with MSF taught me not just to value life, but to be realistic.

Although not a real - estate book, it taught me the value of owning assets that produce income, which led me to real estate.

«To make the big jump to the next level, they're really being benchmarked on their ability to deliver future value to the firm in ways that are not taught or explained to them: chiefly how much business are they are able to bring in,» he asserts.

She realized the value of teaching her employees how to think like this when she was trying to grow her own company and realized that it didn't always come naturally to everyone.

Be sure that all the training you provide (or arrange for) not only teaches the mechanics of the job, but also focuses on doing the work in value - driven ways.

GREENBLATT: Well you know I taught at Columbia as I mentioned for the last 22 years and so I tell my students that first day of class actually, I tell them that you know I don't think there's a lot of social value in being an investment manager, it's not that I don't think investors who do work set help set prices and allocate capital and all those things, but I just think A, they're not very good at it, and B, it'll get done without you.

If, after attending all 8 sessions and applying our teachings from each lesson, you don't feel fully satisfied for any reason, or you didn't get massive value and see real results (like a significant increase in your social - media visibility, fanbase, engagement rates and profitable conversions), simply contact me and I'll happily refund your money in full.

Yet I do, and their value is in teaching me to do things I can't believe possible, to develop skill in doing what I choose to, not just what I feel like.

«At one point I recognized that Warren Buffett, though he had every advantage in learning from Ben Graham, did not copy Ben Graham, but rather set out on his own path, and ran money his way, by his own rules...» I have just quickly glanced at Bronte Capital's blog post, but I am sure Todd Combs and Ted Weschler were not hired because they lived and died by Buffet's word but rather because they manifested the teachings of value investing in their own styles.

While not all business minds are fans of giving kids an allowance, it can act as a great way to teach your kids the value of money from a young age.

thanks for the gbp usd example nial, i traded the eur jpy on a 50 % retrace from the previous day bar ny close as you suggest and i got a terrific trade purely from what you teach also entry was in the value area i won't say more because it's in the course i purchased from you.

With your lifetime free access to the masterclass you get access to 86 videos, more than a dozen hours of brand new value investment teaching content, and access and links to dozens, if not hundreds of resources

I just don't (personally) see any redemptive value in the teachings of eternal punishment.

Is there not a difference in the predicates of a Catholic university and those who claim the right to teach any value free from the supervision of the authorities who hire them?

At least his books don't contradict themselves and teach good values.

Accepting at face value the assertion that Rick Perry has a Divine calling to run for the Republican nomination, we are lead to the question of whether it was a call to Mr. Perry to become the nominee or whether it was, instead, a call to Mr. Perry to teach a lesson about how people should not take the Name in vain in order to obtain political office.

I hope that by observing and being taught these values all my life, I've absorbed some of them, and that my true heart lies in people and places, not things.

It was Christ who encouraged the fair treatment of women... God who commands us not to neglect the poor and to feed orphans and widows... God who insisted that field owners leave part of the crop behind to be picked up by hungry gleaners... God who said men should not take advantage of one another by charging interest... Christ who attacked the Pharisees for their rigid thinking and superiority complex toward Samaritans... How are my values inconsistent with the teachings and actions of God?

The Spirit is not about breaking the law but loving the values it teaches.

And I hope that they will vote «Democrat» in order to send a message that they are not owned by the Republican Party, but owned by Christ and the Christian Values taught in the New Testament.

Not going to «Church» is a vulnerable position if it separates us from teaching and lining ourselves with the Truth — this forum is part of my Church at the moment so I value thoughts to challenge me on the journey.

It was the faith of our founding fathers, not the political, creep shows that would embarass Jesus and those who value his teachings.

Are not mainstream Muslims, and in no way are indicative of its teachings or values.

There can be no doubt, of course, that the teaching of our Lord is of enormous significance, not only for its own intrinsic value but also because it enables us to understand the kind of person that Jesus himself was, humanly speaking.

What if God wants to teach you the value and life found in committing to one person forever, not the exhausting pursuit of searching your entire life to find the perfect person?

Both in the secular world and in the church, our characteristic approach to human frailty is not chastisement and dire threats, but understanding; not calling people to repent their sins, but teaching people the gentle arts of self - acceptance; not an ethic of cross-bearing, but an ethic based on the value of self - actualization.

I think a lot of people would agree that young girls need to be taught that their value is not tied to how sexy they look.

your quote Rebecca «Kids are going to tend to automatically see «less value» even if they are not taught victims have less value» Of course they are that is why these teachings have so much damage.

Kids are going to tend to automatically see «less value» even if they are not taught victims have less value.

But business education doesn't do a very good job of teaching them how to incorporate values in business.

There are a few crazy Christians out there who behave in such a manner, but they are roundly condemned by all Christians as not accurately reflecting Christian values or the teachings of Jesus.

Biblical values were not only taught to me by my mother; she lived them out every day of her life.

But what the church teaches about faith and values is not.

Non-Christian nations tend to have a rough time establishing democracy, because they have no foundation of teaching self sacrifice and unselfish service and other moral values and a public servant in a democracy must not be motivated by greed.

Furthermore, there is value in teaching the hard truths of Christianity, and trusting in God that our efforts will not be in vain.

Its ironic that the people that harp the most about america losing Christians values do not even follow the teachings of Christ and more they even do the exact opposite.

The best way to «sell» one's teenager on being a hospital volunteer or helping in a summer camp for the retarded is self - interest: «It will look good on your college application; it will teach you something you can use later on» If the young manage to catch a glimpse of selflessness in the process, fine; but we didn't direct them to value that part of the experience, nor did we expect that they would think of it in terms of «service» to others.

In this he said, that in an individual case, a couple might judge that they were excused from observing the «concrete directive» (viz. not to use contraception) if they judged that by following the Church's teaching there would be a danger to the essential value of the «community of love.»

In short, although increasing consumption is a widespread social goal, and most Christians participate in it, Christian teaching about relative values has not altogether lost its potency.

Some of her criticism referred to illegal Muslim schools which she said weren't teaching «British values».

His point is clear: «The ultimate value of illness is that it teaches us the value of being alive; this is why the ill are not just charity cases, but a presence to be valued.»

The ultimate value of illness is that it teaches us the value of being alive; this is why the ill are not just charity cases, but a presence to be valued.