Sentences with phrase «not tomb»

Kennedy appeared in bond court on Monday and argued that the Stoneman Douglas memorial was not a tomb or monument, but the judge disagreed.

The smooth suspension and active and passive noise cancellation combine to create a cabin that's not tomb - quiet, but is noticeably peaceful.

Wrongly attributed to Pharoah Khufu, or Cheops, it was not a tomb but a temple.

Using scanning and radiography to analyze the unearthed bones, a team of scientists has concluded that tomb I, not tomb II, housed the king's remains as well as those of his roughly 18 - year - old wife, Cleopatra, and their newborn child, both killed soon after Philip.

It is not the tomb of the long - forgotten King Sil nor the resting place of a golden knight.

Led out and called to account, he is said always to have replied nothing but: «What after all are all these churches now if they are not the tombs and sepulchers of God?»

What are these buildings, these tunnels, these roads, if they are not the tombs and sepulchers of man?»

When led out and called to account, he always gave the reply: «What are these churches now, if they are not the tombs and monuments of God?»

Not exact matches

For example, the gospel of Mark ends at 16:8 with the women leaving the empty tomb so scared that they do not tell anyone about what happened there.

Shouldn't you be etting ready to go praise your dead zombie guy for crawling out of a cave tomb 2000 years ago?

He did not die on the cross, he was taken down and put in the tomb of a rich man.

@fimeilleur actually i can back up the claims i make both personally and historically, one example Abraham, Machpelah (actual location of his tomb and remains along with 5 others in Israel right where they are supposed to be) Kedorlaomer king of Elam, (defeated by Abraham and recently discovered) it is said Abraham believed God and it was credited to him as righteousness.More than that Abraham saw God and spoke with Him, not the god you are on about that men use to justify their evil intent, but the God who has created all things, the God that no one especially you can not contain.Ignorance is your choice but that will not negate the existence of God in any way.No one that i am aware of has all the answers at this point regarding spiritual things, evolution or evilution there are areas God has not yet revealed to mankind but every day more is discovered.I find it amazing that God is big enough to share discovery even with those who would reject Him.

Matthew (written about 50 years after Jesus died)-- the stone has NOT been rolled back from the tomb.

I wonder what would be revealed if scientists would be permitted to study the remains in the tomb at Machpelah... after all, like all things Biblical, we only have one reference, and we ONLY have Abraham's word that he saw the face of God (contrary to John 1:18: No man hath seen God at any time, AND John 6:46: Not that any man hath seen the Father)... Bet you those bones aren't from a 175 year old man and 127 year old woman...

Not one empty tomb verified?

If you are going to cite to gospels as literally true (as you always do for, e.g., the empty tomb) you can not ignore these challanges.

They do not recognize him and he feigns ignorance as they recount the story of his death and of women encountering angels in the tomb.

I see the marble tombs crumble into dust, and I do not want to die!

All of the Gospels have women as the first witnesses to the empty tomb which is unheard of for that time period as women were not considered legitimate witnesses so if the story was fabricated they would not have used women as the first witnesses.

I think someone just removed Jesus's body from the tomb, he did not rise from the dead).

The women at the empty tomb don't understand, and neither do Peter and John.

[Barr] does not feel that it is necessary to accept what he acknowledges is a strong argument, namely, that since Christ's risen body was materially continuous with his body in the tomb, so (probably) is our risen body materially continuous with our premortem body.

The Son of God thingy has all sorts of modern special effects in the promo, suprising they didn't film in 3D, jesus rising from the tomb right into the theatre.

As Paul argued in I Corinthians 15, if Jesus of Nazareth has not been raised from the tomb, then Christian faith is useless.

Since Jesus doesn't come out of the tomb saying, «There.

Biblical accounts state that Jesus just «wasn't there» in the tomb and that the linens that were around the body were just lying there in the tomb.

That Jesus did not go into the tomb to touch him or shake him awake or draw him out puts the resolve upon Lazarus himself.

A women shows up at the tomb first to see that Christ is not there and then goes to tell the men.

Notice: Jesus is troubled and weeping; the tomb is not far from Jerusalem; the tomb is a cave with a large stone covering the opening; the stone is rolled away; Jesus cries with a loud voice; the grave cloth is left at the tomb.

A Resurrection of his physical body, such as is implied by the empty tomb and by some of the stories in the Gospels of his appearances, would point towards a docetic Christ who does not fully share the lot of men; unless, indeed, bodily corruption were to be regarded as being bound up with the sinfulness of man which Christ did not share (but, unless we accept an impossibly literalistic interpretation of Genesis 3 as factual history, it is impossible to hold that physical dissolution is not part of the Creator's original and constant intention for his creatures in this world).

Building tombs for the prophets could be a sincere repudiation of sins of previous generations, but Jesus does not recognize it as such in his contemporaries.

John says that he spoke to Mary Magdalene while she was still in the garden near the tomb, as well as later in the day to all the disciples, except Thomas, who was not there.

Without the appearances, the empty tomb is not significant; and the reality of the presence of the living Lord, as it was known by his followers, needs no external confirmation by the empty tomb.

It has been said of the empty tomb that however early the women had been, they would not have seen the stone being rolled away.

When the angel appeared to Mary Magdalene at the tomb, he did not discuss with her the fittingness of the Resurrection, but rather called out, «Come and see the place where the Lord lay.»

But they do not concern simply the relative lateness of the emergence of the empty tomb tradition; they concern much more Christ's approach to his Passion, the intention with which he confronted his supreme hour.

To believe that the women, who were at the tomb right as the Sabbath (High Day) was beginning, and then RETURNED and did all this BEFORE the Sabbath started is not feasible, along with the fact that Marks states that AFTER the Sabbath was past, they bought the ingredients.

But they do not concern simply the relative lateness of the emergence of the empty tomb tradition They concern much more Christ's approach to his Passion, the intention with which he confronted his supreme hour.

Because «they came with their spices prepared» thinking the body was in the tomb still (``... so they might anoint Him when they would come» Mark 16:1)-- , it was the women's first visit at the tomb, but they had to discover that the tomb was EMPTY and they could not anoint the body.

Then as Luke states, they RETURNED after they watched the stone rolled over the entrance to the tomb, and Luke gives his account from the perspective of the weekly Sabbath, and not the High Day Sabbath as Mark does.

That is not the EARTHLY tomb.

While it is possible to be an intelligent Christian and take the story of the empty tomb as a literal historical fact, Professor Lampe does not.

(ENTIRE BOOK) Professor Lampe states that the resurrection of Christ certainly was not a resurrection of the physical body and that the «empty tomb» story is as much a hinderance as a help to believing Christians.

In Matthew, It's only two women, and they are only coming to look at the tomb, not to annoint.

Because it was a material being who died on the cross, rose from the tomb, and ascended into heaven with spirit and body inseparably united, Latter - day Saints have no difficulty believing also that «the Father has a body of flesh and bones as tangible as man's; the Son also; but the Holy Ghost has not a body of flesh and bones, but is a personage of Spirit.»

Lampe details why he does not take the story of the empty tomb as factual history.

The Bible does not say that it was dark when the women GOT to the tomb.

This shows that Luke and John is indicating «going» to the tomb, and not «arriving» at the tomb.

The stuffy materialism, the lack of purpose, the uncertainty about moral values and the collapse of belief in anything beyond the tomb, are not in themselves a rejection of Christianity so much as a cri de cœur the truth of the Gospel.

In Matthew's main narrative two women, not three, go to the tomb.