Protecting legal rights is
not trade protectionism.
Not exact matches
Canada's history of
protectionism, on the other hand (in addition to restrictions on
trade between provinces), has resulted in markets that are generally less competitive than those in the large U.S. market and real wages that do
not track productivity growth as closely:
The benefits of free
trade and cross border investment are so clear that the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) is
not concerned over Trump's
protectionism.
«All
trade is mutually beneficial or they wouldn't have engaged in the transaction in the first place,» he says, pointing to a
protectionism piece written in 1986 by Murray Rothbard of the Mises Institute, a libertarian organization of Austrian economics.
In an era of tariffs, barriers,
protectionism, and
trade wars, doesn't this T - Trap scenario (with its component of asymmetrical information) apply to every item in the commercial arena?
While I can't comment on the specifics of any particular agreement, we have certainly been assessing this shift toward
protectionism, how it might affect the outlook for growth in Canada and its
trading partners and ultimately what it would mean for the conduct of our monetary policy.
Trade is a great driver of productivity, and so the risk of growing protectionism concerns me.15 More open trade with the United States and Mexico in the 1990s gave Canadian firms access to much bigger markets and therefore greater incentives to invest — in both physical and human capital.16 Disrupting supply chains and reducing incentives to compete will not create more jobs and income in the long
Trade is a great driver of productivity, and so the risk of growing
protectionism concerns me.15 More open
trade with the United States and Mexico in the 1990s gave Canadian firms access to much bigger markets and therefore greater incentives to invest — in both physical and human capital.16 Disrupting supply chains and reducing incentives to compete will not create more jobs and income in the long
trade with the United States and Mexico in the 1990s gave Canadian firms access to much bigger markets and therefore greater incentives to invest — in both physical and human capital.16 Disrupting supply chains and reducing incentives to compete will
not create more jobs and income in the long run.
He may
not ignite a
trade war on this occasion, but US
protectionism will only hinder,
not help, US consumers.
It may
not matter much to Trump, but that
trade imbalance owes to macroeconomic choices rather than German
protectionism.
Beijing has responded in kind, so prospects for an escalation of tit - for - tat
protectionism are ripe, and a debilitating
trade war is
not out of the realm of possibilities.
The stakes of next week's meeting will be high, He argues: «The current China - U.S.
trade tension is
not only a bilateral showdown, still less a tech transfer issue, but a major struggle between unilateral
protectionism and multilateral free
trade.»
Last week,
trade protectionism re-emerged as a concern
not only among the crowds gathered in Davos for the World Economic Forum, but also among financial market participants seeking to gauge the impact of a rising risk of
protectionism.
Here again, it's evident that
trade protectionism is
not the answer; it would
not only lower American living standards (and those of all our
trade partners), but also produce inflation.
«The government must urge its counterparts in Washington and in the EU
not to succumb to the temptations of
protectionism even in the face of growing
trade frictions,» it adds.
While
trade with the EU and
trade with the US is
not an «either or» proposition, the CETA adds strategic advantages as well as an important counterpoint to the threat of rising U.S.
protectionism.
It's
not only President Donald Trump who needs to worry after claiming his policies of deregulation, deficit - widening fiscal measures and
trade protectionism will lift the world's largest economy out of a decade of mediocre growth.