Sentences with phrase «not treat other people»

We do not treat other people with kindness or cruelty based on our judgments of what they «deserve.»

Don't treat other people like liars when they say something good about you.

Not exact matches

There are prison politics that are put in place to make sure people treat one other with respect and don't steal, and to weed out the people causing problems on the prison yards.

Find out how they treated the receptionist, find out what they did while they waited, ask about any chance encounters with other employers... occasionally you can identify a disconnect between what they show you and what they show the people they're not trying to impress.

But over the years, employers have reached differing conclusions about how the Act's language should be interpreted — specifically the line that says employers must treat pregnant women the same as «other persons not so affected [by pregnancy] but similar in their ability or inability to work.»

Most don't make a scene over it; they just make a note of it and take their business elsewhere, while telling a dozen other people about being treated poorly.

High - performance standards should not only be applied to the work, but also to how people treat others, feel about each other, and the energy they bring to the team.

Kaplan acknowledges that while we can't technically mistreat artificial intelligence programs in the same way we are capable of mistreating other people, how we treat AI programs may impact how we treat people.

In other words, one can not simply look at tax rates and conclude that because a two - earner family pays less tax than a single earner family with the same income the tax system is treating people unfairly

Christ would never treat people this way and I don't believe he'd approve of others discriminating in his name.

I also see this dis - repsect we give to gay people as a breaking away from the idea «treat others how you want to be treated» (I know I wouldn't want to be shunned for something I can not choose to change).

One that is just, and merciful, and concerned with how we treat each other and our world (because yes, the Tanach has instructions on how we are to treat even our animals)... or one that just makes willy - nilly laws, fails to spell out what he wants in a single, comprehensive passage (since there are conflicting passages all through the bible), and then gets his rocks off on sending people to «hell» to suffer eternally when they don't figure it out right.

So sorry, but I feel that Jesus would not treat people like the religious right treats others - thru anger, threats, and control.

It doesn't so much matter when the first people were named Adam and Eve; what matters is that all humans are children of one God and ought to treat each other well.

There are many people on this Earth who don't believe in God and are Good to other people, and that is great, but how have they treated God?

It is also true that later people used (and still use) his teachings to oppress others, but many (perhaps most) Christians today look to the example of Jesus for guidance in how to treat others, not to the Old Testament.

It's interesting to see how people will find their own truth, dig in their heals and be blind to any other idea... What would Jesus do is an interesting question... I consider my self a Christian and a spiritualist... because I believe it's just not as black and white as one religion or another thinks... there is way more grey area... but a fundamental truths that are a good rule to live life by, wether you are christian or not... treat others the way you want to be treated... do unto others... I am my brothers keeper... all apply.

Treat people well, do your best to live a good life, and try not to hurt others.

Why can't people treat each other better?

If God is truly love, and Jesus truly said «treat others as you would have them treat you», that the «religionists» are the ones who hate and condemn the most and those who are not religious preach brotherhood and consideration for all people?

And they reduce them to slavery, treating them with afflictions they would scarcely use with brute animals... Therefore, We... noting that the Indians themselves indeed are true men... by our Apostolic Authority decree and declare by these present letters that the same Indians and all other peoples — even though theyare outside the faith... should not be deprived of their liberty or their other possessions... and are not to be reduced to slavery, and that whatever happens to the contrary is to be considered null and void.»

As artificial birth control and abortion define the other as something to be destroyed or defended against, or as in - vitro fertilization and cloning treat the person as a commodity which can be manufactured and marketed, the body ofwoman reminds man that our eternal dignity is realized precisely in our embodiment and not despite it.

I do not need a jealous and vengeful god for me to treat other people as I would want to be treated.

People want to believe so badly that they are willing to treat others not as they would like to be treated, but as something worse, or even kill.

But maybe that set apartness is supposed to be more in the way we show grace for people we dislike, or the way we treat others, not in what aspects of modern culture we eschew.

In closing my point is this: Treat religion like your genitals, don't wave them around in public or force them on other people.

PS: Christians don't have such a good track record on how they treat other people.

There in the closed room, where one probed and treated the isolated psyche according to the inclination of the self - encapsulated patient, the patient was referred to ever - deeper levels of his inwardness as to his proper world; here outside, in the immediacy of human standing over against each other, the encapsulation must and can be broken through, and a transformed, healed relationship must and can be opened to the sick person in his relations to otherness — to the world of the other which he can not remove into his soul.

Up to a certain point, this applies even in a relationship in which the other person treats one strictly as It, for the other must be a Thou for us unconditionally and not dependent on how he treats us.

The Christian extreme bias that a person is evil simply because they don't think Jesus was any more than a good example of how humanity should treat each other, is a position non-believers know too well.

We may not be able to choose the tasks we do to earn our living, but we can choose how we treat other people.

Last time I read the good book I'm sure it condemned murder and violence, and it was Jesus that described that golden rule to treat others the way you would want them to treat you... I wouldn't enjoy being starved and beaten... If these people were actual followers of Jesus they would have followed his example.

We do get to demand that people treat other people with respect or they don't get to play.

In other words, her project suggests that if our governments are going to treat people more humanely, that will not be because the people are sufficiently educated and articulate to demand humane treatment, but rather because their Guardians have been convinced through the imaginative sympathy engendered by the novels they read to be kinder and gentler toward their charges.

The spiritual abuse heaped upon me and many others at my last church was not a joke, but my play on the words non-committed and committed was an attempt at one — which just goes to demonstrate that no matter how miserably the church treats a person, the Spirit can sustain that person's soul and even bring him / her back around to joy and a lighthearted attitude.

Perhaps CNN should say «Act Christian», since it's how a person treats others (the golden rule) that marks the difference — even the devil knows Scripture — but he doesn't act Christian, since he isn't, and as Scripture says, that's how to determine whether a person is Christian or not, and that is by their «first fruits» or how they act towards others...

Familial life when at its best is so ordered that the personal quality of others is augmented; they can not be treated as if they were merely objects or things to be used by one person simply to promote that person's own development.

I have the utmost respect for other people who are not of my faith and I believe that people of the Mormon faith should be treated with the same respect.

So many people have seen «Christians» who don't look anything like Jesus to them, so are genuinely surprised and often interested in finding out just why someone does treat others as Jesus did.

This new community also faced struggles from within, with some of their members lying to one another (Acts 5:1 - 11) and certain Jewish people not getting treated as well as others (Acts 6:1 - 7).

Judge people by how they treat others and the goodness in their heart, and if their spiritual belief or practice does not harm anyone else... then leave it alone.

I don't need it in order to be able to treat other people decently.

Whether I believe in God or not does not matter, what matters is the way that I treat other people and it is everybody's right to believe as it is everybody's right not to believe.

This means that the other, at least in the enaction of the sexual act, tends to be reduced to being a means of sensual satisfaction, and not treated as a person and spouse.

«Of course I was happy because I already found him attractive and not just physically but his spirit and his love for God and the way he treats other people.

They would base my «afterlife reward» not on if I believed, but in how I treated others and if I was a good person or not.

So whatever we see people in Scripture doing (or not doing), this does not give us license or liberty to treat others the same way today.

If someone wants to show their Christianity outwardly let it be reflected in how they treat other people not by defacing our bodies.

Your long winded essays often speak of how you believe people should treat you and your comments with some sort of grace or respect or something, yet you seem to have no ability to offer the same to others when you don't agree with what they have posted.

The «need» to be noticed, loved, and treated kindly is a universal need, I think, and even when we do not have the money or the resources to «buy stuff» for people, we can still take notice of others, and speak to them kindly, showing them the dignity and honor they deserve.