Sentences with phrase «not type your question»

Please do not type your question in all capital letters.

Not exact matches

This type of question is not for the faint at heart; it is, however, second nature for CEOs who sell.

Those types of questions give you a not - to - do list.

«These type of questions don't lead someone to a specific answer, they lead into positive territory.

If you need assistance but don't want to spend that kind of cash, you can go to your SBA district office for guidance; counselors can help you figure out what types of questions you need to ask your target market.

«Plus, the answers to these types of questions are not your business.»

That's not a direct answer to your question but I think it's those types of applications that make the things we already do more interesting, more entertaining, more efficient, that's the potential AR has for us.

This type of cooperation is not on the SPP agenda, and it begs the question: prosperity for whom?

«The really tricky question for regulators is how we structure those type of rules in light of the fact that the funds these firms hold are not denominated in dollars or other forms of traditional fiat currencies,» Lawsky said.

Don't forget to ask type in questions: The webinar is a perfect time to share thoughts and get answers.

These are the types of questions that I haven't been hearing from investors in the past month.

But, I believe the choice of which type of investment to pursue — if only one is to be chosen — is more a question of passive versus active management style, and it is not mutually exclusive.

So it's not a question of whether Christian is OK or not — but has now devolved into WHAT TYPE of Christianity?

anyway, if you heard an atheist ask you a question about any type of belief and really try to make your answer seem wrong then they are wrong, they can not nor will not ever be able to discuss any type of belief due to what they know.

I don't question this Pope's intentions when the picture was taken, but people get way too caught up in these types of things and twist them into something they aren't.

And there are plenty of NT scholars of various types that question the authorship of Peter 2.

If you were to sit around reading the bible at a company like JPL, that is based on type of thinking that is in direct contrast to religious «faith», then I would think it reasonable to seriously question whether or not you were a good fit for that company.

These types of QUESTIONS ARE THE ONES THAT SHOULD BE AT THE FOREFRONT of our self discovery, not turned into a pathetic apology because of some strong handed words built ONLY FROM FEAR.

Don't insult a religion for believing something just because your education level isn't up to par for tackling those types of questions.

And there are plenty of NT scholars of various types that question the authorship of Peter 2 ---------------- And there are plenty of scientists who say that evolution is bunk.

Yet someone who has type 2 diabetes from being overweight would certainly not have their faith questioned!!

Also the question remains as to whether or not the distinction which he draws between these two types of process is really legitimate even in terms of his own vision.

As to the relation of creativity and the Indian realization of bliss, obviously Whitehead did not address himself to this type of question.

And if not, then you should tell us what type of questions «My peace is the questions?»

But... the infinite regress in question is an example of the «non-vicious» type of regress, since it concerns possibilities, and these not (on one view of potentiality) as a definite multitude, whose number is infinite, but as a continuum, which in the words of Peirce is «beyond all multitude,» as God was formerly described as being; and indeed, as we shall see, the continuum of possibilities is one aspect of God which may be truly so described.

My piece was not a «lament,» but essentially a defense of Pope Benedict (as was my brief follow - up here) against just the type of over-the-top criticisms cited elsewhere in Allen's article, even as I raised one respectful question about the pope's prudential decision not to meet with leading dissidents — a legitimate, good - faith debate among sincere Catholics.

I am not the badgering type so I will not ask my questions again.

We may call pursuit of each type of question a different type of theological inquiry as long as that does not suggest either that they are like links or successive moments in a single extended inquiry or that they are somehow variations or aspects of some postulated «theology as such.»

The proposal that the unifying interest governing theological schooling factors into three types of questions does not subtly reintroduce into the discussion of theological schools the stultifying «theory / practice» divide.

However, we might ask whether these three types of questions about congregations do not in fact fragment a course of study, and in at least two ways.

Oh and same goes for jews... there seems to be a lot of jew hate from christians too... so lets repeat the questions for the average christian... don't worry, i'll type it slow, i know most of you suck at reading comprehension as seen by your often complete lack of knowledge of the book to which you folks base your lives on...

How come not one liberal elite Hollywood type questions Obama's Christianity??? Oblablah claims he's a Christian and uses Scripture in some of his speeches... yet the usual liberals aren't upset at ALL about his so - called beliefs.

The latter is a tangled problem at best, but it is clear that among the important founders of the process perspective — specifically I mean James, Peirce, Bergson, Whitehead, Dewey, and Hartshorne — it is Hartshorne's work which comes closest to being a kind of personalism.1 Whitehead explicitly sets aside the personalist perspective in Religion in the Making, considering its claims beyond the possibility of being established.2 On the other side, a number of personalists have been sympathetic to process thought, and Brightman is surely principal among them.3 Here I will not investigate the question of whether personalism in general, or even the idealistic type, is reconcilable with process thought.

Who knows, there might be other life forms out there on planets with differnt types of suns, other types of atmosphere, maybe even based on something other than carbon... Religion can't answer those questions, but science, ever so slowly, is plugging away at the answers.

When you tell people you are questioning the creation accounts of Genesis 1 - 2, a lot of Christians get very angry, and some religious types will actually fire you from your job... What they don't realize is that you are simply using historical - cultural research to understand Genesis 1 - 2 the way Moses and the Israelites would have understood it.

Another study, also conducted in the San Francisco area, demonstrated that symbolic universes tend not to be applied with high degrees of consistency to different types of questions.

Therefore I wish to raise again the question in this final section as to whether Altizer, despite his rejection of Buddhism as definitely different from and lesser than Christianity, has not in the final analysis come full circle and embraced a Buddhist type of radical immanentalism.

These and others might all be valid questions, and different types of content will affect each of us differently, so it is probably healthiest that we do not create «one size fits all» catalogs of sanctioned TV series for Christians.

It is not a question of a vision of a political or strategic type; it is truly a vision that seeks to renew, to rejuvenate the Church and each person in the Church....

I predicted that a few of the more fundamental types would call me a heretic for asking such questions, but I was not prepared for what happened.

I am not a big fan of these type of hypothetical «what if Jesus said thus» kinds of questions.

absurdity is the mindset of the believers mind and so they produce absurd «evidence» to back up their absurd beliefs and then ask you absurd questions in order to show superiority to you for not believing as they do since they believe you could never answer the questions without the requirement of a god type figure.

It is a very real question whether the later decision to use the forms of Greek logical discourse did not of itself radically affect the nature of the message, the type of audience to which it would appeal, and eventually the constituency of the Church.

Ministers often are too hasty to reduce all questions into harmlessness with the «Of course, we know this doesn't mean...» type of comment.

That's not the type of question most people will consider on this Monday as the nation celebrates King's national holiday.

And to my eyes, the man in question does not map nicely onto any ancient or medieval type.

So true... the viewpoint is very narrow when it comes to Christian doctrine — and even questioning some of the obvious basic problems can cause one a type of hell (even it does or does not exist)-- ostracization.

Christ and the Americas We ordered the accompanying worktext as well; this consists mainly of short - answer and multiple - choice reading - comprehension and retention - type questions of the sort I don't normally use.

those types of questions... people who can hear «god» in their minds can't are not to be reasoned with..

Do not ask well thought our, reasoned questions, best to stick to superhumanflyguy type questions..