Sentences with phrase «not under discussion»

Thankfully, this is not under discussion quite yet.

Culling sharks is not under discussion in California, but has been a contentious issue elsewhere.

To avoid any misunderstanding it must be stated that ecclesiology and the nature of catholocity are not under discussion here.

Not exact matches

I'm not sure I would necessarily agree with everything they're coming up with, but I think it's really important to have these debates and discussions and to put a fire under our governmental decision makers to sort this stuff out.

Those negotiations made the news, but with 10 deals in place, two more signed but not yet in effect, 12 under negotiation and three in preliminary discussions, it's tough to keep track of them all.

COPENHAGEN - Riksbank First Deputy Governor Kerstin af Jochnick takes part in a panel discussion under the heading «To regulate or not to regulate?»

Despite all the discussion and hype around Under Armour getting big brand benefit from its endorsement of superstar Jordan Spieth, it still didn't generate the same buzz on social media as Nike.

Then... this is the best part... he made it clear that a 6.5 percent unemployment rate would not necessarily be the threshold for raising rates, then went on a long discussion of the conditions under which he would NOT raise rates, including if the unemployment rate dropped mostly due to cyclical declines in the labor force participation rate rather than gains in unemployment, as well as persistently low inflatinot necessarily be the threshold for raising rates, then went on a long discussion of the conditions under which he would NOT raise rates, including if the unemployment rate dropped mostly due to cyclical declines in the labor force participation rate rather than gains in unemployment, as well as persistently low inflatiNOT raise rates, including if the unemployment rate dropped mostly due to cyclical declines in the labor force participation rate rather than gains in unemployment, as well as persistently low inflation.

This discussion also does not consider any specific facts or circumstances that may be relevant to holders subject to special rules under the U.S. federal income tax laws, including, without limitation, certain former citizens or long - term residents of the United States, partnerships or other pass - through entities, real estate investment trusts, regulated investment companies, «controlled foreign corporations,» «passive foreign investment companies,» corporations that accumulate earnings to avoid U.S. federal income tax, banks, financial institutions, investment funds, insurance companies, brokers, dealers or traders in securities, commodities or currencies, tax - exempt organizations, tax - qualified retirement plans, persons subject to the alternative minimum tax, persons that own, or have owned, actually or constructively, more than 5 % of our common stock and persons holding our common stock as part of a hedging or conversion transaction or straddle, or a constructive sale, or other risk reduction strategy.

Chapter 2, many readers will know by now, is the JRP's discussion, in its role under the National Energy Board Act, RSC, 1985, c N - 7, as to whether the NGP is in «the public interest.»

if you pay attention to discussions of higher education funding, one of the memes that inevitably pops up revolves around the notion that higher education has been under some brutal, neo-liberal assault since... well, I'm not sure, but probably since 1995 at least, and everything is being defunded, laid on the backs of students, it's the end of civilization, dark ages ahead, etc., etc..

This discussion also does not address any tax consequences arising under the unearned Medicare contribution tax pursuant to the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, nor does it address any tax considerations under state, local or foreign laws or U.S. federal laws other than those pertaining to the U.S. federal income tax.

A separate discussion paper published by central bank staffers in October 2017 concluded that even under an alternative scenario in which the potential level of growth was ultimately 1 per cent higher than forecast by 2020, the effects on inflation would be «small» and «therefore does not affect the stance of monetary policy.»

reality does not make up or think anything it copies others lies and repeatedly posts them often having nothing to do with the topic under discussion.

In short, if those dissatisfied with the classical account of nonmoral evil currently under discussion are not able to present a better world, «the (classical) theist does not have to show that it was impossible for God to create a better set of world - constituents or natural laws, or even that this is the best of all possible worlds» (IPQ 179 - 98).

Had those situations been addressed more directly the last time they erupted, they might not even be under discussion now or maybe wouldn't seem so volatile for the recipients of Julie McMahon's pointed narrative and challenges.

While Heidegger's Sein und Zeit has not yet been translated, there is a valuable exposition of its thought and a discussion of its terminology in the prefatory essay to a collection of essays by Martin Heidegger published under the title of Existence and Being.

Of course I'm thinking specifically of destructive behavior; discussions of doctrine wouldn't fall under this model.

From the point of view of reason, it is most logical that we do not beg the question under discussion.

Or to put it another way again, discussion about God's predestination should not fall under the category of justification, but under the categories of sanctification and glorification.

Although the book reminds us of a time when deep social divisiveness was not at the core of the culture wars, was he right to suggest that religion was an under - acknowledged party in American discussions about pluralism?

In the long term, the only solution is the establishment of a culture of public discourse where competence in the area under discussion matters, not an obsession with «equality,» or whatever the next catchword will be.

For Buber's own discussion of the development of his dialogical thinking and the circumstances under which he wrote I and Thou [including his statement that he did not read Rosenzweig and Ebner's books till later because of a two - year period of «spiritual askesis» in which he could do no work on Hasidism nor read any philosophy], see his «Nachwort» to Martin Buber, Die Schriften über das Dialogische Prinzip [Heidelberg: Verlag» Lambert Schneider, 1954].

I have argued in a forthcoming work, The Realities of Faith and The Revolution in Cultural Forms, that the dimension of depth which has appeared in contemporary theology under the discussion of eschatology, has affinities with this new vision of science, if in fact it is not of apiece with it.

(Because his contribution in this respect is not often referred to in the literature on the subject, I mention here the important lectures of Jacob Burckhardt, translated under the title Force and Freedom, with their discussion of the interaction of religion, culture, and the state.)

However, Luhrmann's movie, and not the novel, is under discussion here.

There is an interesting contrast that sometimes develops in relations between at least some men and some women, although the point under discussion does not depend on the stereotyping of either men or women.

You will see that I did not ask every question under the sun (you will not see any discussion of foreign policy, for example).

well, after this post I'm not gonna continue this useless discussion under an archbishop Tutu video, but as our savvy friend Joseph here has pointed out, the NT was not meant to tell history and you are trying too hard to rewrite history.

I'm just waiting for the media to cover some sort of similar tragedy, like the event under discussion here or the Colorado theatre massacre, by saying, just once, that at least one of the victims wasn't a «truly nice, wonderful» person.

These would apply not only to the analyzed occasion under discussion, but would also serve to define any number of occasions, hence would not allow us to recognize to what extent these characteristics are intrinsically peculiar to the given occasion.

With all of these discussions and opinions you shared in great detail regarding slaves bound under biblical law, how can you say that you do not admit that the bible condones slavery?

There are, however, many other issues which emerged naturally in the course of our discussion with Dr. Hartshorne, which can not be easily classified under these two topics.

However, the topic under discussion does not correspond to the grammatical subject, since the former becomes God as primordial and consequent natures.

In any case, the purpose here is not to study the British radicals but to describe this American theological tradition and to ask under what conditions it might become part of the very lively theological discussion going on right now in this country.

, they are NOT under investigation by the Vatican and are irrelevant to this discussion.

Yet it does look as if it is not the same complex under discussion in the two cases.

But even if to please you something were to be said about this, does it follow that a discussion of all these differences, unless it be in contradiction with itself, may not properly be comprised under a single head, over against the class: the contemporary disciple?

Fast - tracking, according to journalist Dave Johnson enables Congress to agree «to set aside its duties under Article 1 Section 8 of the Constitution and vote on TPP within 90 days of it being signed, to severely limit discussion and debate, not to filibuster the agreement in the Senate and not to amend it not matter what problems turn up after the agreement is revealed».

Whether these changes include a new manager or not, that is NOT the subject under discussion so don't waste everyone's time with the Wenger Out rants pleanot, that is NOT the subject under discussion so don't waste everyone's time with the Wenger Out rants pleaNOT the subject under discussion so don't waste everyone's time with the Wenger Out rants please.

Your claim that in the last two games his performance was not up there contradicts evidence produced in the article under discussion.

The issue under discussion is injuries and whether we should have bought a DM in the transfer window not quality of players.

Most of the discussion has been about the problem of campus sexual assault, but the overall concerns that the DOE will not enforce gender equity under Title IX bleeds over into sports, too.

The discussion about young supporters was preceded by a presentation by Paul Milne, Liverpool's safeguarding and assurance manager, who outlined the challenges faced by all Premier League clubs when it comes to safeguarding children and explained why Liverpool do not allow unaccompanied children under the age of 16 to attend games.

I'm not saying for a moment we brush this under the carpet, but no players or staff will change before the summer, so any speculation on significant changes are moot at this point, and emotions are running too high to even have a rational discussion in those areas without getting lost in a sea of shouting.

Therefore, physicians are under no obligation to initiate discussions about a procedure such as elective cesarean that is unproven scientifically or that the individual physician may not consider medically acceptable.

There are a lot of methods that we use that don't work well in group classes, like one - on - one discussion, hands - on activities, more field trips, special interest projects, etc. and some of their methods don't work well for home schooling, like lectures and extensive workbook work (especially for the younger children, under grades 5 or 6, where hands - on experience is what they remember).

I saw some screen grabs recently from a discussion on LB and this horrid doula whose had a few deaths under her «care» posted that LB is being terrorised because women don't want to «take responsibility for their bodies».

The hon. Gentleman did not quite say this, but I think what he was driving at is that there is sometimes a tendency for people on social media to volunteer their opinions with an insistence in inverse proportion to their knowledge of the subject matter under discussion.»

Responding to an increasing number of enquiries over the forthcoming EU Type Approval regulations, the BMF have produced a comprehensive briefing document outlining the current position, explaining the EU process of government, detailing the measures under discussion and by listing a Reality Check, dispelling a few myths over what will and will not reach our home shores.