Sentences with phrase «not up for discussion»

The agent said he didn't care what the buyer brkr got paid — he was keeping the full total on his listing contract and that was how most listing agents did things, and it was not up for discussion — if the buyer agent stated on the payment arrangement disclosure that has to be presented before viewing an offer, and agreed to by all involved, explaining that the buyer broker was being paid outside the transaction — then the full listing percentage got paid to the listing brokerage.

The good news: your personal life is also not up for discussion.

There are lots of rules that are not up for discussion.

In fact, Gavin made two separate statements clearly indicating the science was not up for discussion and he only wanted to talk policy.

Our religious beliefs are not up for discussion.

This is not up for discussion.

What's not up for discussion is that it is a big hit for developer Larian Studios.

What is not up for discussion, however, is Nintendo's strength when it comes to first party titles.

But ok, that's not up for discussion here.

Ignore any arguments or protests because it's not up for discussion — basically imagine she's arguing that she wants to go outside even though it's raining.

The good news: your personal life is also not up for discussion.

I do make it very clear it's not up for discussion in front of my daughter as I don't want her to hear negative views.

Whether or not it can be used in motorsport is a second pair of shoes, which is not up for discussion at the moment.»

No... he's not a Muslim, old news, yes Obama's a Christian and that's his business not up for discussion.

It's not up for discussion or conjecture.

And what I most object to is NOT that someone is quoting the Bible at me, but that the individual's (or group's) interpretation of the Bible is not up for discussion — since anyone who reads the Bible differently must not love God or have a good sense of reason (and / or faith).

Breastfeeding just wasn't up for discussion, so I nursed my babies discreetly and didn't engage them on the subject.

But he had a hunch as to what Rangel might have wanted to say, and the matter isn't up for discussion — not at the moment, anyway.

But LBD's aren't up for discussion today.

The capacity and engine aren't up for discussion.

Not exact matches

Hires for a high - level role often do not participate in a discussion, partially so that candidates vying for a prominent role are not aware of who they're up against.

Even at the Fed, where NIRP keeps popping up, the discussion is marked by a definite lack of enthusiasm for what might turn out to be one of the most toxic policies ever - not just for savers, bondholders, and stockholders, or the entire economy, but for banks!

Everything is still up for discussion, from the size of the class to whether or not it will be offered as a full diploma program.

«In terms of testing... I don't know when exactly that happens,» Ryan continued, adding that he would «leave the EIP up for discussion a little bit longer before we start doing testing on that side.»

Reuters» John Ruwitch reports on what trade issues are up for discussion, and which are not.

Immigration discussions have been tightening for months now and late last year, President Trump decided not to renew DACA in hopes that Congress could come up with a more permanent solution.

«He then told us that racism was dead and shouldn't be brought up for discussion.»

Furthermore, Ryan's death check list AKA the Ryan Plan is actually a 28 year projection not the 10 year projection they are using in the discussions... The reason they are using a 10 year projection is because Obama's plan is a 10 year projection that would balance the budget, Romney / Ryan plan is a 28 year projection that would double the deficit in 10 years, and as people die off between years 10 and 28, and we have a theoretical unprecedented growth of the economy it would break even at the end of year 28... Go look it up for yourself... Then

This means that these issues are not even up for discussion NOT that he is changing any positionot even up for discussion NOT that he is changing any positioNOT that he is changing any positions.

These groups are not substitutes for the total life of the congregation in worship and witness; but they may be a most important means of breaking through rigidities and opening up a frank discussion where there will be no fear of probing sacred symbols and doctrines.

I am sorry Mr. Blodgett could not get reasonable discussion instead of the stir - it - up rage he got instead, for he strikes me as a decent man of decent purpose.

We had this discussion at church should we allow homosexuals in leadership i was the only one who spoke up and i had prayed during the week and confessed all my sin before the Lord i certainly had no right to condemn someone else for there sin.But the fact is that it needs addressing that was my question to the people presenting the proposal.Is homosexuality a sin the people taking the discussion would not address it as they knew scripturally that it was and clearly had no answer on dealing with that issue and tried to detour around it.

just ends up giving your blatantly false claim a platform for discussion that it doesn't deserve.

Wrong: what is not up for debate is — Is God one — or will he and the lesser man - made gods negociate at some round table discussion.

Jeremy I believe you answered the question in another discussion why God seemed evil by punishing other nations i prefer the word you used which is judgement.God weighs up the hearts and then judges fairly thats not evil in fact he weighs up all the factors before he makes his decision and his decisions are perfect and wise.When he commanded Israel to wipe out other nations it was Gods judgement on these nations because of the evil they had committed in alot of ways its exaggerated because they did nt have Christ to shield them like we have if anything it shows how merciful God is towards us today.In those days gods judgement was quick and immediate.What happened to Israel when they broke the laws God gave them they immediately fell into judgement often resulting in many deaths to there own people until the sins of the people were dwelt with.So even for Gods people it was a conditional on there attitude and actions towards God.Again we see God is merciful to these previous nations that were destroyed as Christ after his crucifiction went and preached to them giving them the opportunity to repent so again we see God is still merciful.His word is true The Lord is not slow in keeping his promise, as some understand slowness.

His discussion tacitly acknowledges that technology as it is today is not entirely «rational,» or at least that its use is often governed by such «non-rational» considerations as the desire for unlimited profits or political power (see UP 302 - 10).

I am not a theologian and do not assume to know the mind of God nor am I a man of any particularly extensive education so I do not claim that I have the answer at all I just notice that this thread did not get much attention and so thought that I might take it upon myself to open it up for further discussion for those interested I will check back periodically to continue the discussion.

Here God gums up in the mouth, won't spit itself out with every easy expletive, leaving the discussion free for disagreement.

So while I join you in wishing these discussions weren't necessary and also share in your nostalgia for a time when these topics didn't come up, I'm legitimately mystified as to how to discuss these issues without some overlap.

This wouldn't necessarily help Portland in the short term, but McCollum straight up for Wiggins could be an interesting discussion?

Why we didn't spend is maybe up for discussion and it would not have been AW's decision — but the fact there was a zero net spend is there for all to see.

Dropping Coquelin should not even be up for discussion, he's been one of our best players this season, and the DM position is vitally important because of the way we play.

Blame the media for making this a completely unconstructive discussion and for not covering anything that doesn't at least a little bit shake up peoples» lives.

But that could be set to change at a meeting of the Formula 1 Strategy Group as one of the topics up for discussion is whether or not they should get some assistance to make them more competitive.

He said since the formulas for stats that were brought up were unknown, they would not be allowed to use them as discussion points in the room.

I mentioned in the last post that if this is the topic up for discussion, how our defenders performed, well then how can we not be critical.

An EL victory might put his legacy back up for discussion but should not save his job.

As for your parents, try to have a calm and rational discussion about how much, and how late, you sleep, which means don't get into it right after your mom woke you up at 10:30 and said something along the lines «Get your lazy butt out of bed and empty the dishwasher.»

To an alternate topic of discussion i will just like to point out n remind arsenal fans dat ARSENAL is a top top club and shud be compared to only the likes of man u, chelsea, barca, real, bayern n maybe liverpool, we hav acceptd medocrity 4 far 2 long, finishing 4th n elimination in d 2nd stage of UCL is a failure, we shud be aiming for top2 and d semi finals of UCL... wenger has taking us so low... after d FA cup win we shud hav sign 3 world class players n bloster our squad, if we hav per, olivier, ramsey on the bench as back up 4 world class players then we know were movin forward

simple point: if runners up plus fa cup was enough to close the discussion on wenger sticking around... fine i could live with that... does nt it follows that 4th place and no fa cup would be enough to force him out... qed... that leaves 3rd place with or without cup and 4th pace with cup to debate whether he deserves to stay on or not... 3rd place with a cup would be enough for me (just) the other two and he should do the decent thing and resign