Sentences with phrase «not upvote»

Matter of fact, unlike your totally unfair DV of user1873's question, I didn't downvote your question at all (granted I didn't upvote it as I don't think it's all that wonderful) despite you using bogus «fair share» reason to ask about something not really related to «fair share» argument

Can't upvote this feature request enough.

But in fact as the answer shows the use of the lights is one of the facts required for the passage through the red signal to be legal in NSW, yet for some reason you have not upvoted the answer, let alone accepted it.

The numbers in the squares are unique pieces of feedback (not upvotes in that language).

Not exact matches

Last week, at an on - stage event in Lisbon, Ohanian shrugged off a comparison of Reddit's upvoting mechanism to Twitter's hearts, which let a user denote a tweet is a «favorite,» saying: «We're not going to take too many lessons from Twitter,» he dismissed.

The company had not previously identified any of the accounts, 71 of which had over 1,000 lifetime «upvotes» on the site.

If you know whether it is working or not, share it with others — use upvote and downvote signs to leave a feedback.

I think the upvote or downvote is not reflective of the comment but rather the person, atleast to some extent.

@DrunkCynic But that's not how this (for some reason upvoted) answer describes it.

What's hilarious is that the «correct» answer with tons of upvotes doesn't cite any sources either.

Sam I am, people don't write answers here in order to be upvoted in the first place.

I would upvote the answer if it weren't for the unnecessary use of «DUH».

If you'd like to join us, please upvote our session on Rootscamp's Session Voting Page here... scroll down to the one titled «The Facebook Algorithm Isn't the Enemy».

I don't know whether to upvote this for good points, or downvote it for the formatting and lack of anything to support it.

I'm not sure if I should downvote for incorrectly getting the definition (it's not «waving at»), or upvote for the videogame origin story (which is as far as I know somewhat correct, bit not relevant enough that I was too lazy to chase it down to include in my own answer)

@Philipp Lots of answers that don't provide sources gets upvoted all the time.

BTW I do not disagree with your argument, even upvoted it.

Since I can't comment or even upvote here, I'll just copy a part of comment of @CsBalazsHungary as an answer (if @CsBalazsHungary puts this as an answer, I'll remove mine): «I have only an opinion, so I post it as a comment: US does support anti-russian actions only to show US is still the strongest country, and when they say stop, everybody will obey.

This is a strange phenomenon in this community that there are lots of downvotes and not many upvotes...

I would have just closed your answer if it hadn't had 6 upvotes already.

I don't understand why people upvote such answers.

While I'm not surprised that you got a ton of upvotes on here, this answer is full of premises that are just wrong.

This will not affect the balance between major candidates (since a downvote for A is same as upvote for B, in the balance between the two)- BUT, a downvote for major candidate A is also effectively an upvote for 3 - d party candidate C!

He can make business difficult for a company while «asking nicely»: «Give a upvote to everyone and I won't send the IRS round to audit your books every Monday» but probably less crude.

It sounds like he would basically need someone to write a bot to upvote all posts in a particular thread using the POTUS Reddit account, and ask Reddit not to consider it a TOS violation but merely a time - saving measure on his part.

The point is that whether counceling was or wasn't in the final version has nothing to do with your clearly biased wording, yet you get upvotes since it makes Rs look bad.

The former President was clearly expressing his gratitude for their support, not actually stating he wished to grant an upvote to everyone.

I'm pretty sure this isn't allowed by Reddit's policies given it's a form of «vote cheating» (albeit the rules are oddly shaky for a blanket Upvote).

In this case of upvoting all redditors, the president is not attempting to take complete control of a private company, but he is attempting to exert authority over a company to act in a way other than what they see as their best business practice.

More improtantly, upvotes or downvotes are not meant to display your opinion on the points given.

Do nt forget to upvote good questions!.

Answer good, upvote because even if visible damage does not reach the cords they could be weakened.

I can't give you a second upvote for the edit, but have an imaginary +1 for coming back to update us - best question / update I've seen for ages

I would, at a minimum, upvote the answer for now, but I can't due to limited rep.

So getting a lot of people to upvote your cover design doesn't make a lot of sense (except — by being a winner you'll get a little bit more visibility and free publicity... so I'm not saying don't do it.

I can't help but wonder how this ended up on Hot Network Questions with such a low number of views and upvotes, and a single answer that essentially says «don't ask this here.»

Somewhere deep in a Reddit thread in comments that probably didn't get many upvotes, I'm sure people predicted it.

The article got a lot of attention from some well - known designers like Jon Schafer, Greg Costikyan, Raph Koster, and David Sirlin (who wrote a dismissive and mean - spirited comment which got upvoted like crazy, despite the fact that it didn't really address my article's points).

We did pick up quite a spike from Dungeons and Dragons Online players, however — not the first time DDO players have organized a campaign to upvote their home MMO!

The upvote / downvote system on N4G for sites doesn't work.

Here's a comprehensive post, upvoted 669 times, that says it is «clearly pay - to - win» and lays out the key problems: not everyone wants to play competitive, which has skill - based matchmaking, but high - level cards are so strong that your choice in quickplay is either to pay or endure a horrible grind.

Last but not least, a big THANK YOU to the Steam Community who upvoted this game on Greenlight!

So hopefully next time I don't make an entire paragraph stating that: «hey i'm back remember me hahaha upvote.»

Oddly enough, we didn't see any spike on Steam Greenlight when we were at showcases (and God knows how much we asked people to upvote us!)

Love watching the butt hurt tribes kids running through the comments down voting people who disagree and upvoting the shit out of people condemning hirez for apparently being the devil for not supporting a failing game.

Anyone will be able to upvote the ones they use the most, and hide the ones that don't make sense.

And don't forget to upvote the game on Steam Greenlight!

We made it onto the top spot of Product Hunt's Oscar weekend newsletter and when the smoke had cleared somewhat (it still hasn't fully cleared) over half our traffic had come from the Product Hunt network and our listing received more upvotes than the Pebble Time launch did 5 days later (at the time of publishing).

People here are «compensated» by upvotes, reputation, and comments, and generally can't require payment in exchange for their time and efforts, nor make their work contingent on any sort of reward.

Thanks to this reputation system, it doesn't matter if you get a responsive answer from a person that uses his IRL name, or from a user with a mysterious pseudonym that has the picture of a slice of pie as an avatar... if this user was «upvoted» thousands of times in forums related to the field of computer programming you are most interested in.