Sentences with phrase «not use any of the book»

Now I can't use any of those books unless I buy the new upgrade.

You may create a hyperlink to this Website provided you do so in a fair and legal manner and do not damage our reputation or take advantage of it, and provided further that the link (i) does not portray Book Country, Penguin, this Website or any of the services offered on this Website in a false, misleading, derogatory or otherwise offensive matter, (ii) does not suggest any form of association, approval or endorsement on our part, (iii) does not use any of Book Country's, Penguin's or their affiliates» or licensees» trade marks, trade names, brands logos or other intellectual property, and (iv) does not frame any portion or pages of this Website on any other website.

Not exact matches

In his book «High Output Management,» Andy Grove, founder of Intel, advocates that «a manager should use his calendar as a «production» planning tool, taking a firm initiative to schedule work that is not time - critical.»

When you are writing your book, not everyone will be accepting of the fact that you are locking yourself away for months, using every spare moment to get your book out.

The existing litany of books and blog posts did not sufficiently prepare me for the «best practices» used in the world of business management analytics.

Content in which someone «admits to personal use of non-medical drugs» should not be posted on Facebook, the rule book says.

Whether it's coaching a kids» sports team like the CEO of Insureon, playing a regular game of pickup soccer like celebrity chef Marcus Samuelsson, or extending a standing invitation to your friends for a Sunday evening supper like Huckabee, all the successful people profiled in the book plot out their weekends in advance (though not every minute; just a few «anchor events,» as Vanderkam dubs them) and make active use of the hours they have.

The book's purpose is twofold: to explain how notions of leadership have changed in recent decades (with flat organizations, a more democratic world and individual - empowering technology, leaders — surprise — are not as powerful as they used to be), and to expose the faults — and propose some fixes — for her own industry.

I used to think about all of the books, articles and speeches that I wanted to create but then eventually talked myself out of it, because I would hit a wall and just tell myself that creativity isn't a strong suit of mine.

What other company whose primary source of income is a printed phone book would take the time in 2012 to bother to warn investors that its revenue is in free fall because people don't use its product anymore.

«What CA has done is not science — it's marketing to the ignorant and using the perception of success and proximity to Trump to grow their own brand and book of business,» he added.

As several key copyright cases have shown — including the case of Perfect 10 vs. Google, and a decision involving Google's book - scanning project — just because someone uses content that another entity charges money for doesn't preclude a finding of fair use.

Ultimate Rewards (earned from the Sapphire Reserve / Preferred) can be used at a fixed - value when booking through UltimateRewards.com but can also be worth more when transferring to travel partners like Hyatt or United where you pay a fixed number of points in those programs which are not dependent on the cash cost of that room / flight otherwise.

For organizations that did not participate, BTN used industry sources, published reports and other intelligence about specific programs to provide an estimate of U.S. - booked travel spend.

Not merely a collection of good ideas, this book spells out the 67 timeless principles and practices used by the world's most successful men and women — proven principles and strategies that can be adapted for your own life, whether you want to be the best salesperson in your company, become a leading architect, score top grades in school, lose weight, buy your dream home, make millions, or just get back in the job market.

Users conduct transactions with other users without using a Central server, and does not have a Central authority that performs the functions of the supervisor or has a book of orders.

He suggests that you book early, use all available discounts, pack some food and don't forget to bring your portable charger to avoid running out of juice.

Investors can't bank on innovation revolutionizing the business of either Procter & Gamble or Johnson & Johnson, but they can be reasonably confident that these industry leaders will be around — and booking higher sales and profits — decades into the future given that they make so many products that millions of people around the world use every day.

So NoctCash is intended for internal use only, to settle booking payments on the blockchain, and not for sale on external exchanges — unlike NoctToken, whose value is given by the room listings directly: for every $ 100 worth of room listings, the hotel needs to prove its ownership of 1 NoctToken.

And as an aside, a company that sells at half of book, earns 8 - 10 % on equity, doesn't grow and uses all its earnings for share repurchase can reduce its share base by 15 to 20 % annually.

Gumby, the Bible may be a useless book for you, but not for the thousands of people everywhere who use it daily for strength, affirmation, enjoyment, healthy living, etc..

In the face of that, let's not write off a guy like Francis Chan or take him to the principle's office because he forgot to mention the Lamb's book of Life or to use the words «Glory of God» when he said that angels have to cover their eyes in front of God when they are shouting out «Holy!

I'm not sure if this writer (Mr. Blake) is using a lot of literary license in this article — but the war between true faith and true evil is the plot of most MOST books, not just King's.

I'm sure I'm not using the right wording but it is easy to say something is outdated dogma by only looking at the last line of a book that has been in process for 2,000 years (i.e. 9 times older than the government trying to tell it what to do).

That is, pop culture studies can not simply be about conservatives (or Christians, or Great Books educators) dwelling upon the best moments of such culture, or otherwise using it to prove the relevance of the traditions they want to convey.

Mitch Daniels, former governor of Indiana and now president of Purdue University, has been so accused — but not at all credibly — because of some remarks he made a few years ago in an e-mail, while he was governor, about the tired old ideology pedlar Howard Zinn, whose widely used book, A People's History of the United States, Daniels called «disinformation.»

I also agree that it is not a book of science, the way I see it, the Bible is a way for us to learn about God and one of the ways He uses to talk to us, and to be honest, I don't really pay attention to the evolution theory or any other theories, if it really happened or not (or if it keeps on happening), is fine by me, I respect those who believe them to be true.

«We realize that a thinking person would not consider a 2000 year old book of fiction to be «evidence» of anything... but we need it to prove our point so we're going to use it anyway.»

19th century, archaeological finds (e.g. earth and timber fortifications and towns, the use of a plaster - like cement, ancient roads, metal points and implements, copper breastplates, head - plates, textiles, pearls, native North American inscriptions, North American elephant remains etc.) is not interpreted by mainstream academia as proving the historicity or divinity of the Book of Mormon.This evidence is viewed by mainstream scholars as a work of fiction that parallels others within the 19th century «Mound - builder» genre that were pervasive at the time.

All evidence (including historical application of the book, cultural context, linguistics and origins) indicates the bible absolutely was intended (and not mistakenly used as) as a guide for behavior and morality.

«Muslims believe the Quran is the word of God, so holy that people should wash their hands before even touching the sacred book» is really saying something, considering they don't even do that after using the bathroom!

It was written by many people over the span of hundreds of years, it is tribal rules from the infancy of our development and arguably is not a good book at all but full of hatred, spite and unspeakable violence, and you arent allowed to use «faith» as your proof of existence... faith is nothing less than the throwing away of reason i.e. belief without evidence.

And please do not go to the old stand - by of «the bible says so» its just some old book of stories used to govern the weak willed mases of days long past, but still used today to govern those same weak willed today.

i can referrence any «bible» when talking about any holy book and still use it properly but not change the topic of discussion... this is the times when i wish i was still in talking terms with my old professor, such mistakes would not have happened and a grand conversation may have ensued... whatever... as i said

Darrel Falk, former president of the BioLogos Foundation and a biology professor at Point Loma Nazarene University, reviewed the book and used it as an example of why he does not support the intelligent design movement.

I am looking over this book, and as of yet, have not used it.

Most importantly, note this: I am a Christian, I'm gay, I'm a recovering alcoholic, I believe in Evolution, I believe the universe is 13 billion years old and that the Earth is 4.5 or so billion years old, I believe man evolved from lower primates and that Adam was the first man who God gave a soul and sentience, I do not believe in hell but I do believe in Satan, I do not believe the Bible is a book of rules meant to imprison man or condemn him but that it is rather a «Human Existence for Dummies» guide, I believe Christ was the son of God but I do not believe Christianity is the only «valid» religion, I do not believe atheists will go to hell, while the English Bible says God should be feared, the Hebrew word used for fear, «yara», such as that used in the Book of Job, actually means respect / reverence, not fear as one would fear death or a spibook of rules meant to imprison man or condemn him but that it is rather a «Human Existence for Dummies» guide, I believe Christ was the son of God but I do not believe Christianity is the only «valid» religion, I do not believe atheists will go to hell, while the English Bible says God should be feared, the Hebrew word used for fear, «yara», such as that used in the Book of Job, actually means respect / reverence, not fear as one would fear death or a spiBook of Job, actually means respect / reverence, not fear as one would fear death or a spider.

Webb's views reflect a perspective that is deeply held by many Americans, and his use of the standard resources of theology to articulate these views is one of the reasons this book ought not be simply dismissed.

I always thought I was the «kind» of atheist who - at the risk of alienating every single believer - used to say, «The Bible is an interesting book, and it might even help some people, but it's NOT the word of God.»

It's not a religious book, and the author uses quite a bit of profanity, but he makes some astute observations about religion and politics in the United States.

It is the book used to define in words for everyone in this world and those definitions are the correct ones, not your biblical definition - that one has not pertinence outside of your religion!

Just because your grandparents had some fraudulent, baseless book of lies used in school does not mean they learned anything of value from it.

If there is a God and there is just as much for as against, But lets say there is a God and he made everything Including you and He gets to make the rules because lets face it hes a lot bigger then you, So unfortunately he only wants those who believe in him based on the information given, Lets look at the facts based on the Book,, Some of his own angels turned on him and they see him every day... That had to hurt, So he decides With man he only wants those with the faith to believe based on His book and faith found thru the holy spirit, If you refuse to believe then he cant use you, cant trust you, so he will choose to toss you aside, Hey I understand It ai nt fair, Your important, Your Smart, But unfortunately hes bigger then you and he has the Juice, You either play by the rules or wait and see what not believing leads Book,, Some of his own angels turned on him and they see him every day... That had to hurt, So he decides With man he only wants those with the faith to believe based on His book and faith found thru the holy spirit, If you refuse to believe then he cant use you, cant trust you, so he will choose to toss you aside, Hey I understand It ai nt fair, Your important, Your Smart, But unfortunately hes bigger then you and he has the Juice, You either play by the rules or wait and see what not believing leads book and faith found thru the holy spirit, If you refuse to believe then he cant use you, cant trust you, so he will choose to toss you aside, Hey I understand It ai nt fair, Your important, Your Smart, But unfortunately hes bigger then you and he has the Juice, You either play by the rules or wait and see what not believing leads too.

So just cause Peter followed Christ doesn't mean he was saved he had to have the Spirit to truly follow him which he didn't get til the book of acts so using him denying Christ as an example that's its ok is completely foolish because he didn't have the holy spirit because the spirit is truth and why would it deny itself as being Christ think about that a little bit

You will observe that not one of the books of the Old Testament (in its finished form) is of earlier date than the eighth century BC Before that time there existed traditions handed down by word of mouth, and various documentary records and compositions, which were used by later writers.

Our «early traditions about Jesus» (to use the title of a little book by the late Professor Bethune - Baker) are not interested so much in what has been called the «biographical Jesus» as they are concerned with what Jesus did and said as he was remembered by those who believed him to be their Lord, the Risen Messiah, and who were therefore anxious to hand on to others what was remembered about him.

I do believe that the book of Acts and perhaps even more so the epistles flesh out the «institution» (not the ideal word but the one I have to use) of the local church.

My book was never intended to be a polemic against complementarianism, (the word is only used once in its 315 pages), so I don't spend a great deal of time fleshing out all the nuances and differences of the movement, though conversations in response to the book have revealed these nuances and differences to be many.

True, the concepts, and the terms used to express them, are of great importance, especially for the later history of doctrine; and we are not likely to minimize them if we view New Testament theology as Book One or perhaps Chapter One in the History of Christian Doctrine.

One of the problems when you treat a collection of books as a contiguous whole — interpretations are used that assume a continuity that doesn't exits.