Sentences with phrase «not uterine ruptures»

Uterine windows are not uterine ruptures.

Not exact matches

Not once did I think about my previous cesarean or the scar it left me or the possibility or uterine rupture.

That DOES N'T mean it is unsafe or can not be used by pregnant women and has nothing to do with the risk of uterine rupture.

Any hospital that says they can not support a VBAC mother because they aren't prepared to handle the consequences of a uterine rupture are not safe places for any birthing mother to give birth.

Conditions listed that may be life threatening and / or require transfer to a hospital include but are not limited to: symptoms of fetal distress, severe tears of the perineal area, excessive blood loss, seizures, abruption of the placenta, prolapsed cord, or uterine rupture.

No, I'm not confusing facts... a uterine rupture can occur DURING a c - section, and I never said that MORE occured, just that statistically the risk of rupture is higher (mainly because as you have more c - sections the scarred area and tissue surrounding it gets weaker) and even that fact aside, there are plenty of other risks with c - section that I know many moms who were never informed of them when considering a repeat c vs a vbac, but were certainly informed of the risks of the vbac... that has nothing to do with c - sections being more convenient and more costly though.

I am fed up with the VBAC whining, hereby I suggest the following informed consent, «I, Ms Somebody, am aware that Hospital Somewhere can't offer me a safe VBAC because it doesn't have an anaestaegiologist all around the clock but I insist on having a VBAC anyway and I take full responsibility for the possible uterine rupture and my baby's possible death.»

While this may lead some people to believe uterine rupture only happens in women who have had C - sections, this isn't actually the case.

A VBAC is a safe option, and having a VBAC at home is even better because you won't have to worry about uterine rupture from induction drugs.

If your ob / gyn says you need a c / sec and you refuse b / c you believe s / he is wrong or you refuse b / c you do not want to risk a uterine rupture during a subsequent pregnancy, who then takes full unequivocal responsibility for the present birth's outcome?

If this is a subsequent baby then her chance of c - section is not increased... but her chance of uterine rupture is.

Studies addressing the risks and benefits of TOLAC in women with more than one cesarean delivery have reported a risk of uterine rupture between 0.9 % and 3.7 %, but have not reached consistent conclusions regarding how this risk compares with women with only one prior uterine incision (6, 70 — 73).

I had feared this meant a repeat c - section because the OB's office had said they really wouldn't do much in way of induction because of uterine rupture chances.

Three studies have reported no association (49, 77, 81), whereas a fourth has suggested an increased risk of uterine rupture for women undergoing TOLAC who have not had a prior vaginal delivery (relative risk [RR], 2.3; P <.0001)(79).

One observational study comparing induction to expectant management in women with a prior cesarean delivery found that induction of labor was associated with a greater relative risk of uterine rupture, whereas another study did not (104, 105).

It should be noted that the terms «uterine rupture» and «uterine dehiscence» are not consistently distinguished from each other in the literature and often are used interchangeably.

These studies also found that women with twin gestations did not incur any greater risk of uterine rupture or maternal or perinatal morbidity than those with a singleton gestation (96, 97).

Those at high risk of uterine rupture (eg, those with previous classical uterine incision or T - incision, prior uterine rupture, or extensive transfundal uterine surgery) and those in whom vaginal delivery is otherwise contraindicated (eg, those with placenta previa) are not generally candidates for planned TOLAC.

Because relocation after the onset of labor is generally not appropriate in patients with a prior uterine scar, who are thereby at risk of uterine rupture, transfer of care to facilitate TOLAC, as noted previously, is best effected during the course of antenatal care.

A large multicenter study of women attempting TOLAC (n = 33,699) also showed that augmentation or induction of labor was associated with an increased risk of uterine rupture when compared with spontaneous labor (1.4 % for induction with prostaglandins with or without oxytocin, 1.1 % for oxytocin alone, 0.9 % for augmented labor, and 0.4 % for spontaneous labor).

In addition, there has not been consistent evidence of an increased risk of uterine rupture or maternal or perinatal morbidity associated with TOLAC in the presence of a prior low - vertical scar.

Few studies regarding twins have been completed, but in two small studies with only 45 women, the rates of successful VBAC and uterine rupture did not differ significantly between study subjects and women with singleton gestations also attempting VBAC (ACOG, 2004).

We just don't have data here to quantify the maternal risks of uterine rupture or other maternal morbidities when women with three or more prior cesareans desire spontaneous labor.

It's difficult for doctors to diagnose uterine rupture until it actually happens, Unfortunately, if the uterus manages to tear during delivery, not only will baby have a difficult time being born, but both mom and baby get placed in a life - threatening situation that needs to be remedied immediately.

Similarly, VBAC isn't recommended if you have had a vertical incision in the upper part of your uterus (classical incision) due to the risk of uterine rupture.

You're not a candidate for VBAC if you had a uterine rupture during a previous pregnancy.

Those odds aren't too bad, but I'm still nervous about the possibility of uterine rupture.

Inducing with drugs, manually stripping the membranes connecting the amniotic sac to the uterine walls, or rupturing the amniotic sac to cause contractions does nt always do the job.