The legal defense against those damages gets expensive quickly, too, which is why the coverage pays for your defense against those claims — even if they're
not valid claims.
Not exact matches
I suggest you consider the terms «introversion» and «extroversion» as detrimental to your personal development, keeping you from doing things like Cain did: to succeed at parts of life that an unscientific model shown to be at best poorly
valid and poorly reliable
claimed you couldn't do.
Some complaints aren't even
valid claims.
Daniels
claims the agreement is
not valid because Trump never signed it.
One of the most common reasons a court will toss a non-compete
claims is when the employee did
not receive consideration; a non-compete agreement is a contract, and contracts require the exchange of consideration in order to be
valid.
While it may have once been
valid, today the
claim that «you can't buy anything with Bitcoin» simply isn't true.
On Tuesday, Daniels filed a lawsuit,
claiming that a $ 130,000 settlement she reached with Trump's longtime lawyer Michael Cohen to keep quiet about the alleged relationship was no longer
valid because Trump had
not signed the document.
You
claim the existence of a being for which there isn't a single shred of scientifically
valid evidence.
Without this evidencial support, any
claim regarding knowledge of that gods» intentions, actions or desires is
not valid and must be dismissed as fiction.
and the ad hominem attacks continue... boo hoo... I don't have a
valid argument to counter his
claims... I'll just call him names to make myself feel better...
If so, why
not just assume that the Muslim
claims to be an improvement upon Christianity are
valid, or the Mormon
claims?
Some of the available options elicit from us, if
not a rationally thought - out or instinctive sense of recognition, a sense that a given theological
claim about the being and doings of Jesus Christ is more or less
valid than another.
the nothing from it is
valid, to honest people that understand it is a
claim,
not proof The Book has many «editions» with no one, who believes it, showing any concern of the lack of authenticity when they defend or refer to the BOOK.
You very clearly
claimed «biblical authority», and that
claim is
not valid.
Rabindranath Tagore (1861 — 1941), the Indian poet and writer, said on one occasion that «to reject any part of humanity's religious experience is to reject truth».6 This is
not to say that all religious
claims are the same nor equally
valid.
And no, you have
not presented any
valid proof or evidence whatsoever, despite your (dishonest)
claims to the contrary, that your nasty sky fairy AKA Allah exists, which is a good thing since he seems to be a violent, murderous ass hole just like his many terrorist followers.
If we emphasize the
claim to validity, a putative moral prescription is meta - ethically senseless if an agent to whom it is said to apply can
not choose in a manner that expresses dissent, that is, expresses her or his decision that the prescription is
not valid.
When I reflect on the infinite pains to which the human mind and heart will go in order to protect itself from the full impact of reality, when I recall the mordant analyses of religious belief which stem from the works of Karl Marx and Sigmund Freud and, furthermore, recognize the truth of so much of what these critics of religion have had to say, when I engage in a philosophical critique of the language of theology and am constrained to admit that it is a continual attempt to say what can
not properly be said and am thereby led to wonder whether its
claim to cognition can possibly be
valid — when I ask these questions of myself and others like them (as I can
not help asking and, what is more, feel obliged to ask), is
not the conclusion forced upon me that my faith is a delusion?
But the defense would have been a
valid one, corresponding with the facts, and Pilate could easily have drawn the inference for himself, that, whatever may have been intended by the
claim to royalty (which Jesus did
not disown), the Prisoner was
not a danger to the state.
If it is
valid that
not respecting another's right to live forfeits any
claim one can make for one's own life, it applies even to the killings erupting from anger, jealousy or revenge which make up such a large part of murder statistics but are
not normally subject to capital punishment.
The contemporary NEED to be tolerant and
not the traditional usage of the word (accepting that someone else's view be heard) we have a new definition which is framed as being only able to say that their
claim is as
valid as any other.
Last but
not least: «By definition, no apparent, perceived or
claimed evidence in any field, including history and chronology, can be
valid if it contradicts the Scriptural record.
I hold the record for reading that book in two weeks... your opinion isn't
valid if you didn't thoroughly investigate my
claim.
I agree with Bill Maher, but then again I'm a lifelong atheist... I have never believed for one minute that the god as portrayed in the bible or koran has any possibility of being real to everyone, otherwise that god would make itself obvious and
not hide behind man made lies and cultural practices that self perpetuate thanks fo fear... otherwise there would
not be several thousand man made religions trying to
claim that god as their own... yes, it is an opinion, only
valid to the opinion holder and no one else... Bill, thanks for so strongly making that point,
not that it makes any difference to god fearing people... they will hold on to their opinion as strongly as they hold on to their shotgun, thinking that each provides them with some form of security... to intelligent people, neither is secure and neither leads to true freedom of the mind...
With a reasoned response that both are
valid religions and we just don't know for sure whether these or any religion can
claim a monopoly on truth?
Live4Him, you took exception to Colin's
claim about evolution being taught,
not whether or
not evolution is
valid.
However, even if a manufacturer makes such a
claim there is no way to know whether such
claims are actually
valid because they generally are
not backed by third - party testing or adherence to independent standards of transportation and processing, etc..
Whether or
not the various health and mental performance
claims for Bulletproof style coffee are
valid it does have a dedicated following so having the option here is certainly interesting.
Tampa Bay's seven - year history is full of episodes just as ridiculous as that August 1997 smudged - fax
claim, which, no surprise, didn't dissuade Sands from ruling that the Flyers» offer sheet was
valid.
Gallas
claimed that Mourinho has a distinct fight to win at all costs, while having failed to win a single trophy in his time under the French boss, insisted that the same hunger is
not found in Wenger, and this is
valid reasoning in his opinion to warrant change.
But is the
claim that summer pregnancies result in more twins
valid based in truth or
not?
Robust and scientifically sound therapeutic approaches to healing birth trauma will draw from the most reliable and
valid psychological research and
not from unsupported
claims in relation to an esoteric practice such as rebirthing.
You could presumably make the same
claim about Quantitative Easing, but that is
not a
valid reason
not to do it.
Any
claim based upon an act or omission of an employee of the Government, exercising due care, in the execution of a statute or regulation, whether or
not such statute or regulation be
valid, or based upon the exercise or performance or the failure to exercise or perform a discretionary function or duty on the part of a federal agency or an employee of the Government, whether or
not the discretion involved be abused.
Democrats trying to force Juanita Perez Williams off the ballot in NY - 24
claimed that more than 2,400 signatures on her nominating petitions are
not valid, and should be enough to disqualify her from a Democratic primary.
@RonJohn The U.S. did
not recognize the succession as
valid and did
not treat the
claim that they were a separate country as legitimate.
The Board of Elections initially kicked Martinez off the ballot, and
claimed he didn't have the required 500
valid signatures on his nominating petitions.
Democrats trying to force Juanita Perez Williams off the ballot in the 24th Congressional District
claimed Monday that more than 2,400 signatures on her nominating petitions are
not valid, and should be enough to disqualify her from a Democratic primary.
He believes it is a challenge to his attempt to get on the ticket which
claimed not all of the nearly 3,000 signatures he gathered were
valid.
Congressional contender Jon Kaiman on Monday asked the state Board of Elections to throw opponent Thomas Suozzi off the Democratic primary ballot in the 3rd District,
claiming more than half the petition signatures that Suozzi submitted were
not valid.
So they can all
claim objective truth and one of them may be right and may even be able to demonstrate that, but a perfectly
valid demonstration of something's truth doesn't magically compel people to accept it as such.
(c) And also for * submissions based on the assertion that Mr. Woyome had no contract with the Government of Ghana * and therefore had no
valid claims against the Government be determined by the High Court, and
not by this Court (the Supreme Court), since they do
not involve, according to the relevant case law, the interpretation and enforcement of the Constitution and do
not therefore fall within the ambit of the Court's original jurisdiction under Article 130 (1) of the 1992 Constitution.
If you think posting an answer with
valid, factual links that show your
claims are
not accurate is «abusing voting power,» then maybe you should pick a less reality - based forum.
Dayo and Sodipo contended in their suit concerning the office of the Deputy National Chairman (South) of the party, that a candidate for the position and the delegates from the state that voted in the December 9, 2017 convention were
not nominated by their executive committee whose tenure they
claimed remains
valid till 2020.
Last week, Democrats trying to force Perez Williams off the ballot
claimed more than 2,400 signatures on her nominating petitions are
not valid, and should be enough to disqualify her from a Democratic primary.
It is sometimes inaccurately
claimed that absentee ballots are
not counted unless the race is close; in fact, all
valid absentee ballots are counted even if they will
not affect the outcome of the election.
For many years, there have been
claims that the forensic sciences are neither
valid nor reliable and may
not meet the admissibility standards established by the U.S. Supreme Court in its 1993 Daubert ruling.
This was my first insight that
not all scientific
claims are
valid or reproducible.
Whether or
not the
claims of LENR researchers are
valid, Kowalski believes a clear yes or no answer is still worth seeking.
The group says this shows that the Harvard onco - mouse is
not as useful as the patent holder
claims, and therefore the patent is
not valid.