Sentences with phrase «not value any player»

Not exact matches

Media analyst Kaan Yigit, president of Solutions Research Group says the global media landscape has changed with new players like Facebook, Netflix and YouTube, and while may $ 3.38 billion sound like a lot to pay right now, the real value of Astral's assets won't be determined until multi-platform media consumption across TV, mobile and online really goes mainstream.

If you have no other options then, unless you're a good poker player, you're not going to maximize your value.

Under New York penal law 225, a contest is illegal gambling if a player stakes «something of value» in a contest that the player does not «control or influence the outcome.»

At $ 6,100, Carson Wentz isn't as great a value as is normally included in this column, but getting an MVP candidate and NFC player of the month at the eighth most expensive quarterback feels like a steal and will still save you an extra $ 1,000 compared to the top QBs on the board.

It's that you can't measure a player's value in absolute terms.

Even the abrupt fluctuations in the value of Bitcoin is not able to stop the investors and the foul players.

We can choose to write off various forums as meaningless «gabfests» especially when we're not included, but it seems odd that most if not all of the other serious players in Asia see value in groupings such as the EAS, and it smacks of sour grapes.

So while there's a substantial value proposition in developing the full stack of technology in house, it's not the only thing that matters to automakers when determining which players to partner with.

In recent years, however, some smaller players in the natural or organic food market have been snatched up by larger CPG companies, many of which don't share their values or at least are not thought of by consumers as trustworthy sources for natural products.

Who is in charge of making sure that players we value and want to keep do not enter the last year of their contract?

This list should include the expected value range a target would go for and whether a player will be for sale or not.

Arsenal aren't the biggest spenders so perhaps won't go higher than # 70m, but in truth Madrid should perhaps take the money and run for an injury - prone player low on confidence whose time at the club is surely up and whose value may only continue to tumble down in coming transfer windows.

If Walcott were to be Liverpool's player with his last season performance, his value won't be less than 40m to 50m considering the value Mehrez.

Petrachi said: «We received and refused a $ 65m (# 56m) offer from Arsenal for Andrea Belotti, but it does not reflect the value of the player.

I do not advocate spending money like Manchester city and PSG, but there were decent players available for good value.

@ethangooner Petrachi said: «We received and refused a $ 65m (# 56m) offer from Arsenal for Andrea Belotti, but it does not reflect the value of the player....»

Campbell is better player than Theo, he run forward and backward to support the midfield, it must be a personal with Wenger.i got the impression Wenger does not like a threat or someone to challenge him at any cost.There are few players that should have been sold and use the money to buy a couple of players.We lost on Kanye, ibramovitch, Bailey, and a few others, simply refuse to pay market value.

Every manager plays that game, either to get the player to sign, or to put the player in the shop window for better value (usually, while insisting to the media that the club ain't selling).

1st transfer was a few months after his appointment and that was Arshavin, I can't prove that Wenger was the influence of that transfer but it would support the reason why Gazidis claimed Wenger didn't understand player valuing.

it means he might come cheap but his value will rise and not all cheap players are bad..

I don't know, but for the past 8 years, hundreds if not thousands of basketball players have been eligible, and none have approached his value, this suggests that the odds of improving are sufficiently close to zero so as to rule out that scenario; ditto Kevin Durant.

Wenger doesn't have final say on transfers... Gazidis would have a heart attack if that was the case, Gazidis himself has made a joke about how Wenger doesn't know the price of a player but only the value he would add to the team.

In the long run this will damage the club and its value a lot more than saving 5 or 10 million pounds by not paying more than 35 million for a Lacazette or other badly needed player.

Our bid promises not only to uphold the great legacy of the World Cup but also to advance global growth by creating new opportunities for the world's soccer economy, including greater television and sponsorship rights, increased franchise and team values and greater investment in player development.

Hummels is that kind of player but I can't realistically see us spending that kind of money (circa # 40M I'd guess) on a centre back of that age (little resale value).

Transfers is a different story, but normally if you buy a player for say 40 million, his value can be completely different next season, Mbappe for instance, but it counts as an asset but maybe not in the books.

Maybe I am over critical if I say that it seems we are not great at selling players and getting good value.

They haven't even played an official game, but some player values have already shifted radically

This was because we were paying top dollar to players like Silvestre, Diaby, Dennilson, Chamakh, Bendthner, and a host of other players that didn't add value to the team.

But all over the world many players have chosen a point of honour of not playing for clubs that hurt the values of the team and fans that made them.

let's face it, everyone and his brother has known what our deficiencies have been for several years, so why can't our management team seem to identify our weaknesses and aggressively target the necessary additions... the only plausible answer is we aren't willing to pay even close to market value for the players we clearly need and if we do actually get to the table we seem to make insulting bids that simple infuriate the team in question... for years Wenger has said he couldn't find any world class players to fill our voids, which seems to suggest that he thinks we currently have upwards of 40 world class players on our existing roster... if that is the case he should never be in charge of making personnel decisions... buying late in the window is so problematic, for obvious reasons, and especially since this year was supposed to be different (sarcasm)

Anything less and I don't see the value considering players like Reus earn 80k.

If fans will not boycott the games and stop paying for the tickets then let us at least unite and tell Silent Stan that the CEO is not making him the money that he could, if Silent Stan starts to see Gazidis as a loss to profit then maybe we can get an ambitious CEO in who will help us be ambitious and win titles, use that then to get better business done and add to the value of the clubs assets (players), remove the lowest value players (not good enough for AFC) and replace them with high value assets which will increase in value when we are winning / truly competing at the highest level.

Our coaches not only show players the most refined techniques and strategies in the game, they also teach them the values needed to be the best players, teammates, and leaders on the field.

ramsey is not even a class dribbler in epl world let alone beyond and his passing is decent but not great and too often spoilt by silly tricks most of which do nt come off once we found a quality goal scorer in alexis his value plummeted... great bench player and appreciate his willingness to get in to box but a player in the milner mould but that is it....

No surprise to see Garcia as the favorite, as he's the highest ranked player in the field by a decently wide margin... Vegas continues to list Ollie Schneiderjans among the top 20 favorites to win a tournament despite the fact that he hasn't finished better than t41 since the first week of February... Snedeker seems like good value at 35 - 1... Niemann, for those concerned, is +30000 or 300 - 1.

We are no longer a selling club, so no first team player should be sold if he's not obsolete, or being sold for more than double / triple his normal value.

He said Titans general manager Jon Robinson and new head coach Mike Vrabel made it clear they valued him, not just in the contract and not just as a player, but for more.

Those with a value under $ 100 aren't a big deal, as players can donate that money and retain NCAA eligibility.

Not selling Alexis to a rival (citieh is not our rival anymore, since they are fighting for everything while we are fighting just for top 4 with Liverpool) just to sell him after to a rival in a switch with a player value for about 20 mm and big wage (and a player without the characteristics we need, but one more skillfull but unconsistent playeNot selling Alexis to a rival (citieh is not our rival anymore, since they are fighting for everything while we are fighting just for top 4 with Liverpool) just to sell him after to a rival in a switch with a player value for about 20 mm and big wage (and a player without the characteristics we need, but one more skillfull but unconsistent playenot our rival anymore, since they are fighting for everything while we are fighting just for top 4 with Liverpool) just to sell him after to a rival in a switch with a player value for about 20 mm and big wage (and a player without the characteristics we need, but one more skillfull but unconsistent player).

The thing I have the toughest time figuring out is whether there is value in a sure - thing, 50 HR player who you don't expect to improve.

«Äö √ Ñ √ ∂ «àö √ ë «Äö √ Ñ «Ä † Players not currently under contract for» 91; figures are estimated in accordance with market value; some players may not re-sign wiPlayers not currently under contract for» 91; figures are estimated in accordance with market value; some players may not re-sign wiplayers may not re-sign with A's.

Lets leave Landon at SS and let him grow We know Gettleman doesn't value DBs (see Norman) but given Bettcher's teams in AZ loved their secondary players I could see us building this spot up / hoping the new regime can salvage Eli Apple's career.

Tbh, players value should not concern fans.

To name a few additional struggles: we have to compete with the richest league in the world where every team has money and isn't begging for transfers of their best players to fund themselves (8/20 of the highest valued teams), we have a poor injury record that is being addressed, we have far fewer homegrown talents in our league, the overall league quality is higher even if the highest teams are not of the quality of other top teams, selling of our best players during the past decade has lead to a lack of momentum and yes, there has been times where our manager got it wrong.

Man United haven't any players Everton want, so that leaves Chelski and how much they value Tammy Abraham.

With our billionaire backing AFC should always be counted among the clubs with an elite of young players to be valued not only as world talents but also as assets.

with his attitude as if we have to be his servant, get back to Chilie and get those life values back, he is a football player, but a man first, and as a player and man, his all attitude sucks, i don't know why wenger kept him and take that shit, means we have to take it... I told yo before, get his ass on training camp, ruining all day, shut him up, keep him out of the squad, not even in bench to bring his laim superior attitude... All money he is making, he should think of Chilie street and reality for kids he was once... He is in a great city, a club that won in this league and would be in CL as every year without this type of laim ways... So, of course no one wants him around during that ceremony, not even in the room... Get real sanchez, you came from misery, benched for years by gardiola too, sell out, poor minded..

I understand the aspect of finding fair value but it wouldn't make sense to trade up if the player they want is not on the board at the time

It could also make a difference down the line if you want to attract another «marquee» player The downside to it are: 1) The time that it takes to get to what was mention above could allow a club more ruthless & willing to pay without negotiating to long «steal» the player 2) The player could feel not appreciated at it's true value.