Sentences with phrase «not version changes»

More often than not version changes contain only minor edits and only seem to serve the purpose of making teachers and students switch to a new standard so that they have to once again buy from the publisher instead of second hand.

Not exact matches

It wasn't as stark of a transformation as the almond - milk version — the color change seems to be linked to the Frappuccino melting — but it developed into a pretty light pinkish color.

Android fans will be thrilled to know it's running very recent software version Android 7.0 Nougat, and Motorola hasn't changed much of the software's look and feel.

Maybe you wouldn't think of a thermostat as cool, but today's connected Wi - Fi versions might change your mind.

Use the non-contracted version of who's, like, «Who is (the non-contracted version of who's) password hasn't been changed in six months?»

Swift didn't comment on her change of heart towards Spotify, but Vox notes the move follows a contract that Universal Music Group (Swift's label) negotiated with Spotify to enable artists to keep new albums off the level one version of the platform, which is ad - supported and free to users.

These risks and uncertainties include: Gilead's ability to achieve its anticipated full year 2018 financial results; Gilead's ability to sustain growth in revenues for its antiviral and other programs; the risk that private and public payers may be reluctant to provide, or continue to provide, coverage or reimbursement for new products, including Vosevi, Yescarta, Epclusa, Harvoni, Genvoya, Odefsey, Descovy, Biktarvy and Vemlidy ®; austerity measures in European countries that may increase the amount of discount required on Gilead's products; an increase in discounts, chargebacks and rebates due to ongoing contracts and future negotiations with commercial and government payers; a larger than anticipated shift in payer mix to more highly discounted payer segments and geographic regions and decreases in treatment duration; availability of funding for state AIDS Drug Assistance Programs (ADAPs); continued fluctuations in ADAP purchases driven by federal and state grant cycles which may not mirror patient demand and may cause fluctuations in Gilead's earnings; market share and price erosion caused by the introduction of generic versions of Viread and Truvada, an uncertain global macroeconomic environment; and potential amendments to the Affordable Care Act or other government action that could have the effect of lowering prices or reducing the number of insured patients; the possibility of unfavorable results from clinical trials involving investigational compounds; Gilead's ability to initiate clinical trials in its currently anticipated timeframes; the levels of inventory held by wholesalers and retailers which may cause fluctuations in Gilead's earnings; Kite's ability to develop and commercialize cell therapies utilizing the zinc finger nuclease technology platform and realize the benefits of the Sangamo partnership; Gilead's ability to submit new drug applications for new product candidates in the timelines currently anticipated; Gilead's ability to receive regulatory approvals in a timely manner or at all, for new and current products, including Biktarvy; Gilead's ability to successfully commercialize its products, including Biktarvy; the risk that physicians and patients may not see advantages of these products over other therapies and may therefore be reluctant to prescribe the products; Gilead's ability to successfully develop its hematology / oncology and inflammation / respiratory programs; safety and efficacy data from clinical studies may not warrant further development of Gilead's product candidates, including GS - 9620 and Yescarta in combination with Pfizer's utomilumab; Gilead's ability to pay dividends or complete its share repurchase program due to changes in its stock price, corporate or other market conditions; fluctuations in the foreign exchange rate of the U.S. dollar that may cause an unfavorable foreign currency exchange impact on Gilead's future revenues and pre-tax earnings; and other risks identified from time to time in Gilead's reports filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC).

Bitcoin Gold developers said the Linux version of its official wallet app was not changed during the incident.

The simple (or simplest) textbook version (normally) assumes the exchange rate is not expected to change.

SegWit would use a mechanism called a soft fork to enact its change, meaning that those using the network would not be forced to pick between two competing versions of the software when an update is introduced.

Foundr Version 1.0 features 7 comprehensive chapters covering everything from starting a business, building a team, raising capital and more from over 30 game - changing entrepreneurs — we're not talking a simple collection of mumbo - jumbo interviews where you dig for useful little nuggets of gold: we've broken it down to deliver the stuff you actually need to know immediately.

In plain English, a hard fork is in upgrade or change to the currently running software that will implement changes that are significant enough that if all of the computational power (miners) that are running that software do not agree to the changes, the result is that you have some running the old version and some running the new version.

There is a catharsis in actually selling what you have and it most often leads to many great changes to design and prioritization that would not have happened had we not sold a minimalistic version first.

Facebook is spelling out in plain English how it collects and uses your data in rewritten versions of its Terms of Service and Data Use Policy, though it's not asking for new rights to collect and use your data or changing any of your old privacy settings.The public has seven days to comment on the changes (though Facebook doesn't promise to adapt or even respond to the feedback) before Facebook will ask all users to consent to the first set of new rules in three years.

As part of the change, for investor context, Alphabet today published a version of all of last year's financials as if Nest were part of Google and not an «Other bet.»

It's not that I don't feel like I can, I can... but is that in the vocabulary of the one who I worship, if it's not then why would I as His Son want to take on what is not His, my Father's nature... The versions of the Bible I've read seem to think that words are powerful and speaking them is an action and can even change physics if used properly... Again, the scriptures speak for themselves and circumventing the topical study with christiany cliche come - backs doesn't answer or annul anything that the Word has to say on the matter.

You guys may have your own perspectives on the Bible, but don't change and try interpretating your own version of the Holy Bible.

Alongside paid services such as Netflix and Amazon Instant Video, and commercially supported versions such as ITV Player, it is not only changing the way we consume media, but is also affecting our attitudes to TV consumption.

Whereas the Jansenism of old despaired that anyone could really be loved by God, be good enough to receive Holy Communion, or be saved, its newer version has so little faith in the power of God to change hearts that it presumes God does not care for something so insignificant as the human heart.

In two respects, however, the Thomas version may be more original than the Matthaean, for, as Jeremias points out, the fact that the merchant is a general merchant and not a dealer in pearls, preserves the element of surprise, and that the merchant sold his merchandise is more likely to be original than that he sold all that he had (Ibid., p. 199) Both changes are easy to account for in the tradition; the first under the influence of the fact that the merchant found a pearl, and the second under the influence of v. 44 when the two parables were brought together by Matthew.

The arrogance to act as if your version of Abraham's god is any different... Noah's boat, The Garden of Eden, Living in a fish for 3 days, Satan existing, The slavery, The changing morals, The contradictions, The need to kill jesus, The fact that bible scholars can not agree to what it says, and the 3 gods all rolled up in one thingy.

Finding a dozen versions of a dog, deer, fish, or plant is not the same as finding the slow change of a plant into a fish, into a dog.

(A stronger version of this, which killed or imprisoned the entire inner circle and most top Baathists, would amount to «dynasty change,» but because it would assume the emergence of another strongman, likely from the ranks of Baathist officers, it would not be regime change.)

Indeed, as I examined the New Testament section of the New Revised Standard Version line by line I was astonished by the almost unerring precision and appropriateness of not just some but virtually all its changes.

I will always tell people that I'm catholic, as I believe it to be the only true version of christianity (the rest have spawned off of catholicism), but I will not go to mass again until the church changes many of their outdated polices and practices.

They claim that their Koran has not changed in all these years — it is still Version 1.0.

It is important to recognize too, that he does not love «some future version of us» as if he «kind of» loves us now, but if we would only fix A, B, C and change D, E, and F in our lives, THEN he would REALLY love us.

The Christian versions of the household codes were clearly progressive for their time (more on that in a minute), but does that mean they have the last word, that Christians in changing places and times can not progress further?

(John 14:16 - 24) So radical a change was involved in this Hellenized version of the Messiah's coming that the Jewish objection to it is put upon the lips of «Judas (not Iscariot)» who marveled, we are told, at a second coming so inward and spiritual that it would not be dramatically obvious to the whole world.

Don't you think a lot has changed since the original hebrew to the various recent versions, and the Book of Mormons??

I am no Scholar but, I believe God has the power to change prophecy the way that he did with Hezekiah, his intentions for a perfect people in the beginning changed due to disobedience so who's to say our men or intended leadership has overall been disobedient, and many women have been forced to lead and in that leading women have been more obedient.We all need each other if my husband was a pastor and I'm his help mate if he for some reason can't teach or preach who else other than myself would be the closest to him.I don't believe GOD changes he's always the same but, he does have the power to make changes and he does not need our permission to do so, instead of debating back and forth over our version of the Bible we should be sure we have the Holy Spirit and real relationship with GOD because he will reveal to us his truths but, please know he's not the author of confusion

Something that I keep remembering about the church lately is that death ai nt» pretty and so often we judge others» journeys, try to change them if it doesn't look quite right, the way we think it's supposed to look, the way we think it should look for it to fit into our safe version of God.

Even * if * the bible (pick whichever version you like as a starting point) was not actually changed, as in a version 1 + was never released, christians only pay attention to the bits they like, so in effect, the bible and christian's adherence to it, have changed over the years.

And in the issue of versions such as king James and the new imternational version, the meaning or message has not been changed, just written differently so people can understand it.

I don't think it can be any more clear the this: Romans 1:26 - 27 (King James Version) 26For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: 27And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.

I usually do a version of the ol' soba noodles «n greens with sesame oil and garlic, but this was welcome change of pace... and I have plenty of leftovers.

I made some changes and posted my version at http://gggiraffe.blogspot.com.au/2013/04/topsy-turvy-dinner-savoury-chocolate.html — I just tossed the beetroot and carrot with the dry ingredients and didn't get your love colours — plus my goats cheese didn't seem as creamy as yours and just sat atop my muffins but they were delicious — thanks for a great recipe

I have long loved the unhealthy version of this dip, but the thought of Velveeta just gives me the creeps so I haven't had it in forever... that is all about to change with this recipe!

There are heaps of versions of this Nordic / Viking / Stone Age bread (Stenalder Brød) floating around the internet; my version has a large variety of nuts and seeds but if you don't have one in particular or the walnuts are on special you can chop and change the quantities to your liking.

Julie sent over the recipe, and we both discussed how we wanted to make some changes because of the undesirable texture — her version fell apart easily and did not have any body (they would mash with even the slightest push).

While French onion dip is not something that initially comes to mind when party planning, her version completely changed my perception, and with Labor Day coming up this weekend, I thought there was no better time than now to share.

This wasn't too difficult really since I knew I could make buckwheat and quinoa porridge versions but it's also nice to change things up from using those food which are grey areas for some on a grain feee diet.

The addition of cashews and pine nuts not only adds flavor, it also changes the texture and consistency of this cheese in comparison to the almond - only version.

I don't tend to go in the fruit direction — probably because I like to save my fruit for smoothies or snacks — but this blueberry version is changing my tune.

As for freezing, yes, a sweeter version does freeze well and does not change consistency once thawed out.

Maybe that's why I haven't made it in a long while, but that's going to change now that I have this baked version!

Aside from the roster of celebrity investors, change of colors, and shiny new downtown - adjacent stadium — which I will forever condemn for destroying one of the great temples of rock - n - roll history — it is hard to see much distance between the old and new versions of Chivas USA.

I'm going to go out on a limb and assume Taggart didn't change to his version of a spread with the thought that he'd be making a run at the Oregon job, but it worked that way.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

Rob Manfred wants to enact pace of play changes, and there isn't anything that can be done to stop him from implementing some version of them.