Sentences with phrase «not via radiation»

Not exact matches

Fanged frogs present an even more exciting challenge, he says, because their diversification likely was influenced not only by the dynamic tectonics of Sulawesi, but also by adaptive radiation via ecological diversification.

However, because of the small amount of radiation exposure, it's typically reserved for patients who have not gotten definitive results via other means.

From about 0.7 solar radii to the Sun's visible surface, the material in the Sun is not dense enough or hot enough to transfer the heat energy of the interior outward via radiation.

The only way heat can escape to space is via radiation because space is a void and therefore heat can not be transmitted by convection or conduction.

Considering also that Northern Hemispheric cooling in 1940 — 70 is attributable to the «global dimming» effect of increasing sulfate aerosols, the sulfate cooling effect is, again, felt more strongly in Greenland, and indirectly via altered atmospheric dynamics not via local radiation budget modification.

Thermal energy or heat is not transferred to gases via radiation.

14), addresses the mechanisms of atmospheric heat transfer not only via radiation but also by convection, which is not mentioned once in the IPCC's scientific reports (Ref.

Given that it's trapped due to that, it's not there to be lost via radiation.

For a «system» to be in radiation - rate - equilibrium, I believe all subsystems of that system must also be in energy - rate - equilibrium — not radiation - rate - equilibrium because the subsystems may exchange energy via convection and conduction.

Only now heat can leave the black body via conduction and convection as well as radiation, so I don't want to say the black body reaches radiation - rate - equilibrium, rather it reaches energy - rate - equilibrium.

Doesn't this make heat release by IR radiation part of the process at a molecular level, or is heat release by dissipation via gas to droplet collisions much more dominant?

The planet doesn't just lose it's energy via the atmospheric window, it loses substantial amounts via radiation by GHGs.

But don't take to much notice of me as I also believe that Advection i.e. the kind of horizontal air movements that follow isobaric surfaces and therefore are predominantly horizontal) have got more of a Green House Effect (GHE) than does a radiation circuit, of say 324 W / m ² originally removed from the surface, and then returned via Green House Gases (GHGs)-- which, by the way, show no sign of having warmed at all (no hot spot) But even so, when somehow the same 324 W / m ² are delivered back to the surface for absorption it is supposed to be getting warmer.

-- The surface is, in the EFC, shown to absorb 168 W / m ² of incoming Solar radiation, but does not even attempt to conserve any energy as it gets rid of (24 +78) = 102 W / m ² via thermals and «evapo - transpiration» and then in stead of being contented with radiating away the remaining 66 W / m ², it sends out a whopping 390 W / m ²

There is no input for back radiation in any heat transfer equation so taking as if it does something can not be shown via standard equations.

If heat in a mixture comes from a source in wavelengths not absorbable by CO2, CO2 will not contribute additional warmth, but will cool via emission of infrared radiation.

Back radiation is not temperaure and no formula you can show someone to demonstrate heat transfer via back radiaion.

It is related to density, it's the altitude where thermalization via collision starts to not be as effective a means for the excited molecules to lose energy compared with radiation, it varies with altitude depending on the gas.

And, therefore, energy exchanged between the surface and the atmosphere via radiation is not proven to be equal.

In terms of climate it means that the energy coming into the earth - system is not only the solar radiation that «everyone» quotes, but also via light itself in the magnetic field, as well as via the polar Birkeland currents, and much like the stellar circuit proposed by Alven as reported in Parker, E. N., 2000, Physics Today, June issue p. 28, where the earth replaces the stellar object and the currents dropped down in density to dark current mode.