Sentences with phrase «not violent people»

I can only speak for myself and say that I am not a violent person, although I do find you to be an annoying troll - like person I certainly do not feel violent towards you and I would consider this conversation anything but convenient.

I am not a violent person nor do I normally curse.

The fact I even have to write that last sentence and reassure you I'm not a violent person reveals the level of stigma that exists around mental health.

I'm not a violent person, so this is the 5 seconds of my day where I let it all out.

According to Linda Ikeji, «I spoke with Wizkid through his lawyer on Friday April 15, 2016 where he tendered an apology to me and said he wasn't a violent person, that he didn't mean what he said, that it was just an emotional outburst.

Speaking to some chiefs in the Eastern region as part of his Easter visit to the region, Nana Addo indicated that the machinations against him will not succeed because he is «not a violent person.»

I'm not a violent person at all but thus was my level of annoyance.

It was one of those scenes that sort of appeared on the page, and part of me wished it hadn't, though I knew that it felt true to Stephen, who wasn't a violent person but just didn't know how to handle his anger and sadness.

Not exact matches

Although people who suffer from psychosis are usually not violent, «there is a small subset of psychotic people who are implicated in shootings.

Your phone is not as important as your life, and if someone is willing to attack you to take yours (which I'd be willing to bet doesn't happen as often as people just swiping it from your hand or purse), it would probably be best to let this violent person have the phone and walk away with your well - being intact.

Nice - Matin also reported that he had been condemned to a suspended sentence of six months for committing a violent crime with a weapon, but he was not under the surveillance of French authorities and was not listed as a person who could pose a threat.

Despite the fact that there are an estimated 10 million LGBTQ - identified Americans and 62 % of Americans are in favor of marriage equality, LGBTQ people are not protected from workplace discrimination, face growing numbers of violent hate crimes, including harassment on public transportation, and have been called the cause for «societal collapse» by the sitting Vice President.

I don't see Christians as more honest, more faithful in marriage, less violent, more giving, more polite, or more anything than the millions of people who are indifferent to religion and who only go to a church if there is a wedding or a funeral.

We must fight this... It is because of the actions of evil men like Osama Bin Ladin we have to remind people we are not violent.

All I see is Muslims who say that they are being sterotyped, but I do nt see those same people complaining about sterotypes actually telling the «minority» they are wrong for being violent.

i'm human without a god and allowed to vent my internal anger that prevents me from taking another annoying christians head off their shoulder physically... to answer yes i'm a violent person and i really don't give two cents if i was the only persont hat could save you, i would let you die; it would help the gene - pool later on.

Observer: A person with a violent predisposition or criminally inclined should not attempt to subvert his / her behavior if they recognize the damage to self and others?

One stops to think of actual countries of sand, which include more than a few particularly violent locales, places where people are not as willing as Mary Oliver to concede the comfy and common received idea of liberal Christianity that we all worship the same deity by «whatever name.»

If Muslims don't agree with the sects that are violent against non muslims and other peoples way of life, then they need to get a hold of these lunatics.

@niknak: «Not to make light of it, but people like Vic seem to be getting crazier and more violent as science keeps pushing them into a corner.»

i give people respect for being human and accept them as such, however to love a criminal or violent person not happening.

«Guns don't kill people...» but the presence of a gun in a person's immediate environment has, in psychological experiments, caused frustrated people to have bloodier, more violent fantasies than the presence of a fishing rod.

He often echoes King's attitude that this generation not only must stand against the vitriolic words and violent actions of the bad people, but also must rebuke the appalling silence and indifference of the so - called good people who enable social stagnation.

Strange, strange theories invented by violent, murderous humanity to explain away why not only was it o.k. to kill God in person, but somehow it was a great thing for us.

Hate me if you like, but a place were people are allowed to say things like fuck off back to sodom is not a good place to get help when somebody has been violent to you and emotionally abusive.

When I ask Carter to describe the kind of young person who commits violent crime, he says there are some recurring themes: «The common factors will be a broken family at home, someone who isn't fully engaged in their education — absenteeism from school and truancy — and domestic abuse is a key factor as well.

Jesus says to the two people on the road: can't you see that this had to happen — that the mechanisms of division, the self - deceptive and ferocious need to make ourselves out as innocent, the fear of a violent god who demands blood — how all that had to be undone?

The capitalist who, operating from his headquarters, exploits the mass of workers or colonial peoples is just as violent as the guerrilla; he must absolutely not assume the mantle of Christianity.

Those people committed those violent acts in spite of what the Christian doctrine teaches, not because of it.

What I would like to see from the Mosque's Imam is a public, unequivocal statement that he does not tolerate violent teachings or attacks against Americans and issues a Fatwa forbidding any moral, monetary or logistical support for people planning or contemplating jihadist violence.

I think they mean that most people in the world aren't thinking too much about whether or not God is violent.

Not every Israeli is some violent, racist person.

In regard to the first objection, I would wish to reply by making clear that I do not intend to suggest that, because modernity has lost the organic integrity of Christianity's moral grammar, every person living in modern society must therefore become heartless, violent, or unprincipled.

If one person decides not to throw a punch, kick, shoot... whatever would be deemed «violent» and it is due to their faith... then yes, religion stops violence.

But if God truly does have a violent and bloody side then Jesus was being deceptive, for nowhere in His life or ministry did He reveal God as someone who goes to war against His enemies or commands the genocide of people who do not love or obey Him.

Zod's apologia, «every action I take, no matter how violent or how cruel, is for the greater good of my people,» would be out of place in a Trump speech as a matter of style, but not of substance.

If one truly believes that people are only saved through one's version of god, then wouldn't any action, no matter how violent, be justified in «saving» those people?

Did people just end up imagining God as a «he» because of his often violent behavior, or because those men just couldn't imagine having to answer to a female?

Whether you and they acknowledge it or not, those people have to put aside or ignore their beliefs to properly practice healthcare, else they'd have to follow the violent demands of the bible such as these, rather than actually curing people:

But sometimes people use religion as the excuse not to deal with violence — praying for god to take care of the violent people, rather than doing something about it themselves.

Not sure i am convinced because how do you explain the verse an eye for an eye in the old testament there have always been consequences for wrong doing and stiill are for sin.If we believe the word then that word is from God not satan.As far as satan is concerned he uses violence as his tools of trade he works on our fears and is limited to robbing stealing and destroying he does nt have anything else.Violence confirms to us that there is a spiritual battle going on both on the earthly plane and in the heavenlys and the battle is over souls.The verse the kingdon of heaven is expanding and violent people take it by force is referring to that spiritual battle and as satan uses violence to expand his dominion so does God use violence to counter him.So what does he mean by that term for me i think it is saying that the the force of evil that satan uses or violence is overcome by a greater violence or force a more powerful one that being the Love of Christ.Through the cross we see that clearly portrayed and in our lives that very same battle is still happening right now for dominion be clear if we walk in the flkesh satan will have dominion over us but if we walk according to the spirit and abide in Christ we have freedom from our old nature.and satan.He can oppose us but he wont be able to influence us if we are in ChriNot sure i am convinced because how do you explain the verse an eye for an eye in the old testament there have always been consequences for wrong doing and stiill are for sin.If we believe the word then that word is from God not satan.As far as satan is concerned he uses violence as his tools of trade he works on our fears and is limited to robbing stealing and destroying he does nt have anything else.Violence confirms to us that there is a spiritual battle going on both on the earthly plane and in the heavenlys and the battle is over souls.The verse the kingdon of heaven is expanding and violent people take it by force is referring to that spiritual battle and as satan uses violence to expand his dominion so does God use violence to counter him.So what does he mean by that term for me i think it is saying that the the force of evil that satan uses or violence is overcome by a greater violence or force a more powerful one that being the Love of Christ.Through the cross we see that clearly portrayed and in our lives that very same battle is still happening right now for dominion be clear if we walk in the flkesh satan will have dominion over us but if we walk according to the spirit and abide in Christ we have freedom from our old nature.and satan.He can oppose us but he wont be able to influence us if we are in Chrinot satan.As far as satan is concerned he uses violence as his tools of trade he works on our fears and is limited to robbing stealing and destroying he does nt have anything else.Violence confirms to us that there is a spiritual battle going on both on the earthly plane and in the heavenlys and the battle is over souls.The verse the kingdon of heaven is expanding and violent people take it by force is referring to that spiritual battle and as satan uses violence to expand his dominion so does God use violence to counter him.So what does he mean by that term for me i think it is saying that the the force of evil that satan uses or violence is overcome by a greater violence or force a more powerful one that being the Love of Christ.Through the cross we see that clearly portrayed and in our lives that very same battle is still happening right now for dominion be clear if we walk in the flkesh satan will have dominion over us but if we walk according to the spirit and abide in Christ we have freedom from our old nature.and satan.He can oppose us but he wont be able to influence us if we are in Christ.

Actually Brehvik does not consider himself a christian in his words, «in the strictest sense», so the first part of your point is moot... Secondly I think a fairer statement would be that not «all» muslims are violent extremists, as many who don't live in western countries are, as their book does instruct them to kill any and all who do not procalim allah as the one god and mohammed as his prophet... As far as having extreme passion for one's beliefs, if someone was truly to be an «extreme» christian that person would be completely loving as this was Jesus» command to love both God and everyone... to take that to the extreme would mean «extreme» loving, like the radical kind of love that caused Jesus to endure the cross for the sins of us all... includinig the man who committed this atrocity and yes any and all of the muslim's who have committed similar things.

How can you not see that your very violent bible can lead people to violence?

I made no such assertion, because it doesn't make the comparison between ra - pe, which is a violent act committed against a person's will, and an abortion, which is a concious decision made by the woman any more accurate.

«You knew that you were not a violent Trotskyist,» declares the second - person narrator, the chiding voice of conscience.

These churches and mosques are indeed fighting an uphill battle; they can not totally counter the pervasive influence on black people, especially black youths, of the sexual and violent images purveyed by mass media.

While Greg is absolutely right that «something else is going on» in those violent texts, I do not think that the «something else» is that God is withdrawing from Jesus or from other people.

I am not sure I can answer all the objections, but I hope that my view will have fewer objections than the common view that God and Jesus are violent deities which do harm to people.

Please do not misinterpret us as violent people and read koran to understand us.

Good luck with your violent world, cause it does not accomplish anything to hurt people it just makes people more mad, and starts more wars!