Not exact matches
In Buffett's annual letter in 2015, he gloated that 98 % of shares
voted were
against the
proposal, a result he interpreted as, ««Don't send us a dividend but instead reinvest all of the earnings,»» adding, «To have our fellow owners — large and small — be so in sync with our managerial philosophy is both remarkable and rewarding.»
He noted that although Apple has characterized it as a pro-shareholder measure,
not everyone agrees with that assessment, citing a report from one independent proxy service called Egan - Jones that recommended shareholders
vote against the
proposal.
We're assuming they
voted against this
proposal though we don't have a breakdown from Google.
The Board of Directors reasons for recommending a
vote against those
proposals have
not changed.
The Board recommends a
vote AGAINST a stockholder
proposal seeking to have us adopt a policy requiring that senior executives retain a significant percentage of stock acquired through equity pay programs until reaching retirement age because our existing stock ownership guidelines and other compensation policies already effectively facilitate significant stock ownership by our executives, and establishing holding requirements based on a particular retirement age would
not be in the best interests of our stockholders.
In all of this, we must
NOT forget the 38 percent of the electorate who decided to
vote against this
proposal in the teeth of this emotive onslaught, especially those who changed their minds (21 percent).
Trustee Dwight Walton, who
voted against the nature sanctuary
proposal, said that after hearing complaints about the additional traffic and noise problems that would face the Lake Arlington neighborhood, he could
not vote for the plan.
But Wilson said that board members were told after the unsuccessful November referendum
proposal for construction of a community center that many people
voted against the measure because they did
not agree that a fitness center should be included.
A number of state Senate Republicans weren't happy with a breakaway group of Democrats aligned with them after they
voted en masse
against a GOP budget
proposal last week that included many initiatives the independent Dems had sought.
McMahon says a
vote against the ballot
proposal does
not mean a
vote against giving kids access to pre K and computer tablets.
He said he is considering possibly
voting against the House Democratic budget
proposal because it does
not currently include tax hikes on the wealthy and instead offers spending cuts for programs for the poor and middle classes.
Michelle de la Uz — appointed to the City Planning Commission by de Blasio when he was public advocate, and reappointed by current Public Advocate Letitia James — has become one of the de Blasio administration's most ardent critics, often
voting against the city's housing and development
proposals because she believes they do more harm than good and that the housing is
not at the levels of affordability it should be.
This would allow the Commons to characterise any Lords
voting against the
proposal as breaching the Salisbury Convention (whereby the Lords does
not oppose later reading of bills passed by the Commons if the
proposals were included in the manifesto).
A number of state Senate Republicans weren't happy with a breakaway group of Democrats after they
voted against a GOP budget
proposal last week that included many initiatives they had sought.
Despite that
vote, Hochul said she will campaign hard
against the Ryan spending
proposals, because business owners and farmers in her district «are
not buying it that Paul Ryan has dressed things up a little differently this year on Medicare.»
Tustin Unified
voted against the school's
proposal, citing concerns that the charter school
proposal had an incomplete instructional program and lesson plan specifics, its budget was
not realistic and that teachers did
not have the credentials the charter school requested.
This means that if the creditors to whom you owe the highest amount
vote against the
proposal, the IVA may
not go through.
This means that BVF's enemy is likely
not stockholders
voting against BVF's
proposal, but stockholders
not voting at all, because failing to
vote has the same effect as
voting against BVF.
The Board believes BVF would
not be an appropriate steward for all stockholders, and urges stockholders to reject the BVF
proposal by
voting on the WHITE proxy card
AGAINST the removal of your Board.
To be accepted, Joes» trustee must
not have received a majority of the
votes cast
against his consumer
proposal.
The Government of Canada did
not vote for or
against Joe's consumer
proposal.
In order for your
proposal to be accepted, your trustee must
not receive a majority of the
votes cast
against your offer.
In other words, when considering whether or
not your
proposal has been accepted, we actually look to see how much of your debt has
voted against your consumer
proposal (
voted to reject your offer).
A broker non-
vote will have the effect of a
vote against the
proposal to approve the Plan of Dissolution but will not have any impact on the vote on Pro
proposal to approve the Plan of Dissolution but will
not have any impact on the
vote on
ProposalProposal 2.