A left - wing comedian has said he was told by the Labour party that he could
not vote in its leadership election.
Left - wing comedian Jeremy Hardy says he has been told by the Labour party that he can
not vote in its leadership election.
Not exact matches
While I understand that the NDP must feel intense pressure to capture
votes — including from people who have never taken a course from John Smithin — I often wish that the NDP would show a bit more policy
leadership on the issue of the deficit and debt. I was particularly disappointed during the 2008 federal
election campaign when Mr. Layton stated, unequivocally, that the NDP would
not run a deficit
in the following year if elected (even though it was clear that Canada was entering a recession).
Despite a
vote of no confidence, Corbyn has insisted he won't resign, citing the large mandate he won
in the 2015
leadership election, when he finished 40 percentage points ahead of his nearest challenger
in a
vote of party members.
Many of that large majority will
not vote and of those who do, it is worth noting that
in the last two
leadership elections they have
voted for candidates
not supported by the majority of the PLP.
Those polls suggested that almost two - thirds of members
voting in the
leadership contest had joined the Labour Party before,
not after, the 2015 general
election.
On the payment of a small registration fee (the level of which has
not yet been decided), they too could
vote in leadership elections.
There are also rumours critics are prepared to trigger a no - confidence
vote in Cameron's
leadership if the Tories» poll rating does
not improve by summer 2014 — a year before the general
election.
Even on the old system, 60 % of Unite members did
not vote for me
in the
leadership election, although they were recommended to do so.
Affiliated supporters will be able to
vote in leadership elections and
in the London mayoral primary next summer, but
not in parliamentary selection contests.
If Serwotka is
not to be seen as hypocritical, I challenge him to introduce a rule change which will enable supporters to
vote in the
leadership election of the PCS by paying # 3 and stating they support the aims and objectives of the trade union movement.
They don't want me to
vote in the
leadership election and I have no idea why.
Today, however, such a system is
not commonly practiced and most parliamentary system parties» rules provide for a
leadership election in which the general membership of the party is permitted to
vote at some point
in the process (either directly for the new leader or for delegates who then elect the new leader
in a convention), though
in many cases the party's legislators are allowed to exercise a disproportionate influence
in the final
vote.
Not only will you be able to
vote in the upcoming
leadership election, but you can have a say
in forming our policy platform at party conferences as well as choosing local candidates.
I don't object to having some time limit on joining to
vote in the
leadership election but 1) that should be made known when people join and 2) six months is far too long — it should be no more than one or two.
Until the party and its
leadership can admit to the mistakes made
in government, or to the lack of courage shown
in not tackling the clear problems that prevent ordinary people from enjoying the sort of life that the middle classes take for granted, then I fear a whole swathe of Labour supporters will simply choose
not to
vote Labour, whatever promises are made at the next
election (this is essentially ditching the last vestiges of New Labour I suppose).
We didn't see this coming until it became clear that (a) the thousands of new «# 3 members» who joined to
vote in the Labour
leadership election were nearly all Corbynistas, (b) Jeremy was playing to packed houses of adoring crowds everywhere he went to campaign and (c) his rivals were fighting lacklustre campaigns
in comparison.
Around 70,000 people who
voted in the
leadership election did
NOT vote Labour
in May's general
election.
The Liberal Democrats may
not have succeeded
in «decapitating» key members of the Tory
leadership at the last
election (Charles Kennedy had hoped to oust David Davis, Michael Howard and Theresa May) but the Conservatives, says The Telegraph's Andrew Pierce, are hopeful that tactical
voting and some extra resources could defeat six of Labour's leading faces:
«Labour is to look at broadening its electoral base by offering the chance for Labour sympathisers, and
not just members or union levy payers, to be given a
vote in the Labour
leadership election.
However «if the Leader were to lose such a
vote (again, on a simple majority basis) they must resign, and they may
not stand
in the
leadership election which is then triggered (Rule 7)».
I also didn't
vote for Nick Clegg
in the
leadership election, gave him the benefit of the doubt but his bullish behaviour
in not stepping down after a series of dire
election results and sanctioning orange bookers libertarianism means to me he must go and asap.
The first thing to remember is that the relatively few people eligible to
vote in the Labour
leadership election — 400,000 odd until a few weeks ago, now more like 600,000 — are
not remotely representative of the rest of the country.
Part of the reason it hasn't happened is that many CLPs are wedded to the «leader leads» model which is, for them, a reason to prevent a grassroots movement emerging (i.e. it's
not that new members are simply «consumer members» who only want to
vote in the
leadership election).
John Rees, from Stop The War, told Sky News today: «I would be surprised if Labour party members didn't want to see a
leadership that more fundamentally agreed with the leading member that they overwhelmingly
voted for
in the
leadership election.»
The NEC
elections don't represent
leadership, look at the Centre right on the NEC Nominations, Akehurst, reeves Wheeler, they backed Ed miliband, was publicly against Iraq,
in 2010 ′ the Lefts NEC man Ken Livingstone,
voted for Ed balls for leader, who was pro Iraq
She's a national officer for trade union Prospect and
voted for Ed Balls
in the
leadership election, but quoted support from other
leadership candidates (
not including Dianne Abbott).
In another mooted change, registered supporters - those who have registered their support but are not full party members - would be entitled to vote in leadership and mayoral elections «for a small fee»
In another mooted change, registered supporters - those who have registered their support but are
not full party members - would be entitled to
vote in leadership and mayoral elections «for a small fee»
in leadership and mayoral
elections «for a small fee».
Ed Balls will
not be happy to hear that I practised what I preached
in the
leadership election by using only a single one of my many
votes.
The BBC's Iain Watson said the unions were on the verge of agreeing that the electoral college should be abolished -
not for conference
votes, just for the
leadership election - so all members, including the «opted -
in», union - affiliated members, would get one
vote each.
In the
leadership election, soft left
votes went to the hard left candidate precisely because they did
not have a candidate, though I myself, firmly soft left,
voted for Burnham and Cooper as unity candidates.
Don't let history repeat itself
in 2015 — stay tuned next week as Capitol Connection explores what's at stake during the upcoming midterm
election, and the importance of your
vote in determining the membership and
leadership of the 114th Congress.