Sentences with phrase «not voted for the change»

Not exact matches

All politics aside, changes in the minimum wage have effects on all businesses, large and small, whether you voted for them or not.

Critics complain «say on pay» votes are ineffectual because boards aren't bound to the results, but of the 53 U.S. companies for whom shareholders rejected compensation plans in 2012, 45 made changes and got positive votes the following year, according to Institutional Shareholder Services.

The government wasn't responsible for most of these changes, of course, but votes on free - trade agreements are an easy target for blame.

Parker adds that unlike the fight for the right to vote, which was legislated with the stroke of a pen, today's gaps in equality can't be mandated, and won't change over night.

He argued that the new government's perceived approach to Brexit is not only about leaving the EU, but also fundamentally changing the British economy, saying: «Basically its rewarding people who voted for Brexit, its about infrastructure, its about the productivity gap, its about the regional divide, rebalancing the economy — the stuff that was talked about in 2008, but nothing happened.

It said the tactic was meant to confuse shareholders into voting for a package of reforms, even if it included the stock change that was not in their interests.

Knuckling under to this protection racket is not the change that most people voted for in November 2008.

The Board of Directors reasons for recommending a vote against those proposals have not changed.

This finding — that Liberal - and NDP - voting business owners are more on - board than not with changes to income sprinkling rules — suggests that this specific change may not be a crisis for the federal government in the way some have characterized these changes overall.

We're also doing the change in our voting patterns to really have «new management»; we want to ensure that we will have some money left in the Heritage Trust Fund so that our grandchildren will be able to pay for the land, air and water that the oil and gas industry has contaminated — that they will not do the remediation work on — before they leave Alberta.

Any changes in requirements for insurance companies, which are likely to be an important element of any replacement legislation, could not likely be passed under reconciliation without 60 votes to waive the Byrd rule.

It's time for a real change my brothers and sisters and it won't happen in a voting booth... not in the situation we find ourselves in today.

For one I could point out 20 mispelling errors, «Mormonism» not a word, weird huh.I am a Mormon I do support Mitt and I did in 2008, but religion aside Mitt can get it done, and he has in the past!!!! Obama has failed the USA no doubt about that.Mitt's morals, family values is what America is on.Shame on the people who can't move past that, You (not me) voted on a black man for President and not a Mormon, turns out the Mormon Canidiate coud have changed the whole USA around cool hFor one I could point out 20 mispelling errors, «Mormonism» not a word, weird huh.I am a Mormon I do support Mitt and I did in 2008, but religion aside Mitt can get it done, and he has in the past!!!! Obama has failed the USA no doubt about that.Mitt's morals, family values is what America is on.Shame on the people who can't move past that, You (not me) voted on a black man for President and not a Mormon, turns out the Mormon Canidiate coud have changed the whole USA around cool hfor President and not a Mormon, turns out the Mormon Canidiate coud have changed the whole USA around cool huh.

I am not voting for him and will not change my mind.

As a Christian, I vote for extended rights not because of changing morals, but because Jesus told us to accept all.

Nor, can you vote for the Mormon high priest whose opinion on abortion changes direction like the wind!!!!! Don't be deceived by this wicked and greedy man's lies.

The reason for the present Republican surge is that this isn't change that most Americans believe in, although it is change they voted for (at least if any of them gave a moment's thought to the more or less inevitable policy consequences of their votes for Obama and a Democratic Congress).

Even if Labour gave a free vote, which is unlikely, the pressure from Labour constituency activists (not Labour voters) would force most Labour MPs to vote for the change: just a few people of principle will hold out.

Yep you are right, I moved down here in the state of Mississippi, north of Crystal Springs from Chicago when I was ten years old but still I visit once in a while, now it's twenty years and sad to not much has change, like the parts you said about non-whites discrimatory or rasicts at other non-whites, when I went to school here they treated me as a alien from another galaxy, they pick at my voice cause I didn't had that southern dialog, unlike them I said my words correctly, but not just me, they even hated at others who had better intelect I am not picking at them, It is what I went through all these years, Mississippi and mainly this small town of Crystal Springs see America in a crazy awful view, They don't like difference that even within they own race, ther not that politcal, when some one say God they got there vote, I don't to say much to waste your time, I still remember when I was ten years old I had a constanct back ground check on me to see were I really come from evn though I had the paper saying Chicago Illinois barely no jobs but a church on every street for a town barely under five Thousand, till this very day, they look at me like I am a alien, did you ever had that experiance down here damn my keybroad mess up,

Now, this does not necessarily mean everyone who voted for Donald Trump changed their views about character.

I voted Obama for change in 2008, that change did not really come as I was hoping.

If this lady is voting for Mitt Romney simply because she wants a change and he belongs to her church maybe she should not vote for all the Republican congressmen that have refused to work with a Democratic President.

Better for us all to know you can be bought by the fringe now so when you try and change your tune with higher political aspirations we have the proof you are not worthy of a vote.

Obama even flip flopped and believe me it wasn't for a change of heart it was for votes.

Vote for whoever the heck you want but remember that We The People are still gonna be here after election day... Change doesn't happen overnight, not in a year, four, eight, or even fifty if we can't work together.

I will be voting for Romney because Obama has had almost 4 years to try to fix the problems this country has, and he hasn't done a very good job, it is time for a change.

«It's not just changing demographics that are responsible for the growing Green vote - it's people like my family,» says Greens leader Richard di Natale, who grew up in Reservoir.

Well, you know on the inside whether or not you changed your vote so that he's still there for you.

We are not going to persuade each other to change our opposing views on Wenger as it is pointless for me to try me to persuade my wife to change her views on Brexit or friends on who they vote.

They say the specific number of clubs who voted in favour of the rule change is not yet clear but at least fourteen of the twenty clubs must have voted for the proposal in order for it to be sanctioned.

In politics, when you want change you vote even for someone else in order to remove the party you are not happy with so In football until fnas get together at arsenal fc we will keep sinking deeper and deeper.

Anson, speaking in Zurich earlier today following England's failed bid to host the 2018 World Cup finals, was so incensed with the outcome of the 22 - man vote in Switzerland that he said «don't bother» bidding for future finals «until you know that the process is going to change to allow bids like ours [a chance] to win.

The BBWAA itself brought us the rest of the way, as they voted to change things up and reveal who is voting for which players — or who isn't voting at all — rather than let this continue to be a secret.

So the rules provide for senators whose opinion has changed to motion for another vote, whereas those whose opinion stays the same don't get to keep filing to reconsider.

Cuomo said the Legislature didn't have an appetite for the proposed changes, which included constitutional amendments for term limits, limiting private - sector income and bills aimed at making it easier to vote in New York.

When the Senate one - house budget was passed, Avella said he had not changed his mind about either charter schools or co-locations, but wanted to vote «yes» because he believed the plan would result in more money for NYC schools overall.

A key requirement of democracy is equal protection of all stakeholders - i.e., if at some point there is a completely fair vote of 2/3 population preferring the choices advocated and implemented by party A; and 1/3 preferring the choices of party B - then a system must ensure that the minority gets adequate protections and fair treatment; so that while at this moment country gets steered to choice A, the minority doesn't get punished in any way for saying that in their opinion choice B might be best; and if some of the original voters change their mind, the choice B can still be known even if the governing clique that was elected on the idea of A wants to continue with A forever.

It is known that people tend to overestimate the share of immigrants (for instance Ipsos 2014 report shows that British respondents think that 31 per cent of population consists of foreign - born respondents, where the figure is closer to 13 per cent according to 2011 Census); here we also show that people's estimations of levels of immigration do not correspond to actual change in their local areas, it is the perception that seems to be linked with anti-immigration vote.

Today's Marist poll finds voter sentiment hasn't changed much when it comes to the upcoming midterm elections, with voters closely divided on whether they're willing to support incumbents or vote for new faces.

One of the key insights about campaign spending is that it tends not to change voters» minds about who to vote for but rather whether or not they bother turning out to vote at all.

Compounding problems for Democrats hoping to win the seat, a majority of voters — 54 percent — are locked into their decision as to who they will vote for in the special election, while 33 percent said they were «fairly certain» they won't change their mind.

Also, many voters - including Leave voters - reacted against austerity last year by voting for Labour, but the Tories have done little to change course on this and may now decide they don't need to.

The power of agenda setters to manipulate the outcome of referendums helps to explain a frequently observed paradox of referendum voting: high levels of public support for general change frequently don't translate into support for specific change.

At this point, there was a significant push to enshrine the office as a two term limit for the sake of changing status quo and in 1951 they drafted an amendment to the constitution doing just that (Though it allowed the incumbent FDR and VP Truman to be exempt from this law until they were voted out, though this did not happen.

Perhaps if you want more representation for Labour, you should contact the PLP and ask why not a single Labour MP voted for changing the system to AV?

Thus, the second signal that a vote for Teachout will send is a demand for change in the Democratic establishment, which can not continue to dance around the issue of income inequality.

What is forgotten is that trade unions voted for this change because the current system gives parliamentarians, not trade unions, a stranglehold on the vote.

The answer is to persuade the 40 % of the electorate who have currently «given up» not to sit on their hands and abstain from voting — but to vote for the minor parties — if we can persuade enough to do this, then PR and real change will inevitably follow.

For many who have switched to Labour since 2010, buyer's remorse is a big factor, especially if they simply voted for change, or liked David Cameron, but had not considered the likelihood of cuFor many who have switched to Labour since 2010, buyer's remorse is a big factor, especially if they simply voted for change, or liked David Cameron, but had not considered the likelihood of cufor change, or liked David Cameron, but had not considered the likelihood of cuts.

Didn't he cave in a couple of years ago after taking thousands of dollars from NYSUT and vote with a «heavy heart» for a budget that included changes in the teacher evaluation law that quite severely tied teacher ratings to test scores?