Sentences with phrase «not well labeled»
A power button adorns the front while a reset button lurks up top, and while both are easy to access, but they're not well labeled.
https://www.digitaltrends.com/ Not exact matches
The FTC also said that when it comes to labelling, advertisers shouldn't use terms such as «Promoted» or «Promoted Stories,» because they are «at best ambiguous and potentially could mislead consumers that advertising content is endorsed by a publisher site.»
Journey is a great example of an early 80s bands that focused on business as well as art by plowing earnings back into stage, sound, and lighting equipment; purchasing their own trucks and transportation gear; and providing their label (CBS) not only with finished records but also with artwork and merchandising material.
While it was easy to switch the paper label someone might glue to a bottle (the adhesives weren't that good back then), branding the cork was an effective way to ensure you were buying and drinking what you thought you had purchased.
Some 88 percent of participants labeled it a «dangerous» bubble, predicting it «will not end well.»
When it comes to labelling, the FTC said, advertisers shouldn't use terms such as «promoted» because «they are at best ambiguous and potentially could mislead consumers that advertising content is endorsed by a publisher.»
But that doesn't mean jobs will come back because [things are] made in America, because the labels may as well say made «by robots» in America.
«You're paying for privilege and brand and label that makes you feel good and better about yourself,» he adds, «but doesn't actually affect the two things that matter most which is your health and the environment.»
Perepelkin says that failure applied to the pharmacies as well; for example, the Canadian pharmacies didn't carry Target's ClearRX trademark for prescription drug labelling that's been successful in the U.S.
Today's «undecided» students, however, are by no means wearing that label like a scarlet letter; rather, it's often seen as a symbol of whimsical youth, of spontaneous self - discovery, of a Tolkien-esque desire to explore: «Not all those who wander are lost...» Well, sort of.
While plenty of good buys abound on this retail holiday, some aren't as good as they seem, with items costing more than they did just a few weeks ago or stores listing products at the full retail price, but slapping the label «Black Friday deal» onto the flyer to entice shoppers.
«It's private label, private branded, so we're not paying other brands as well, and we have a very efficient labor model, low - cost real estate,» Bird said in a «Mad Money» interview.
Loblaw has been a world leader when it comes to creating an in - house label that is every bit as good, if not better, than the leading national competitors, says David Soberman, national chair in strategic marketing at the Rotman School of Management.
In the second auction, the Desk will auction Treasury collateral for loan against a pledge of AAA / Aaa - rated private - label residential MBS not on review for downgrade, as well as collateral currently eligible for Desk repurchase transactions.
For someone who has been labeled both a «perma - bear» over the past decade, as well as a «one lonely raging bull» in the early 1990's (Los Angeles Times), I can't say that either description is fitting at the moment.
Social currency isn't a label that says one person is better than another.
A judge's ruling on warning labels for coffee isn't backed by evidence and could do more harm than good.
While I definitely wouldn't label it as the best safety razor, it is still a decent product considering the low price.
95 % of online adults aged 18 - 34 are most likely follow a brand via social networking (MarketingSherpa), so you really have a good chance of getting in front of your target using social channels — don't make them unfollow you by posting too much bottom - of - the - funnel / sales content, which gets quickly labelled «spam.»
As investor confidence soared, a fad surfaced that there were about 50 well - known companies (IBM, McDonald's, Pfizer, etc) which were labeled can't miss investments that would continue to grow their dividend and offer healthy stock price appreciation.
Too often, as well, believers will label something as being «in God's hands now» when they are entirely capable of doing something about it, but don't have the motivation to actually do it, see?
well chutty - oh where to start - if you don't beleive in god, fine... then don't... i don't beleive in mermaids, but i don't espouse my non-belief as «passionate»... nor do i denegrate those who may believe in mermaids with derogatory labels like zionist or evangelist... if you don't believe in god, then your belief in your fellow man should be a little stronger than having to slap labels on them....
He is eager to declare the Bible inaccurate, and that is equivalent to saying God is a liar, and saying that God can not be trusted, and saying that man has better answers, which is the same as deniers do, except for the ones who are afraid to admit their hate of God, and instead try to hide their hate behind ignorance and the atheism label.
Well I sometimes use the Christian label so as not to be oppressed by people like you — for example, when filling out religious preferences for organizations like the Boy Scouts.
scot you said» «yeah well, despite crying and whining i didn't research it and prove you can try hanging labels on me all you want»
It wouldn't be so bad if the labels were meant to help us to better understand each other but it is honestly a little scary how quickly and harshly some chose to judge those around them.
Since when once is seeking an honest answer one does not limit the discussion by setting boundaries such as: «Without arbitrarily labeling as mass mental illness,» especially when that could very well be the case.
Critique, concern and hurt are met with: «then let us make ourselves look like the open - minded soft - hearted good - guys while we simultaneously label you as «not us» and show you the door».
Well Im not a believer... but I do nt believe in labels so im not an athesit Im a human being who is trying to live the dream.
But we can be in it and not of it if we follow your advice (example) and see the people behind the label and the bonds of love that tie them together - of wich the institution that forms as a result it is just a byproduct - often not even a good one.
As with anything, it's better to ask someone what they believe or do not believer instead of relying on a label.
By taking on complex characters who don't easily fit any predetermined bubble, Plaza is helping the rest of us feel better about our own lack of labels.
In addition, the very first public notice of her was as a mystic, a label that has stuck to her, and academic theologians are not well disposed to mystics.
I'm doing my best publicly to not abide by any labels but in my heart of hearts I know I mostly embrace Christianity at any given time... it's kinda in my bones... but doesn't conform to a lot of the trash I learned in my fundi days and for that I am grateful.
People spend way too much effort throwing around labels and pretending to be offended by them, and not nearly enough time discussing substance, like whether the poor people of the world would be better off or worse off under a collectivist system.
What one culture assigns labels that we translate as «good» and «bad» is pretty obviously something assigned by the culture so we aren't saying anything anyone disagrees with.
Humility is a good one too, and we would all be in a better place if we didn't rank our personal labels as better than others.
God can't be confined to them and I've decided to not label myself as well... It just limits my ability to search for the truth.
What I meant was that people who label everything good and bad, tend to avoid «bad» things like anger and sadness and fear so that instead of dealing with those emotions, they just pretend they aren't there — even though they still are.
There are also agnostics, who believe that we don't know if there is a «God»; and there are theists, who believe that there is a higher power, but don't believe religion's claims that he / she / it interacts with us or directs our paths in an afterlife; and there are people with no label to their beliefs, who believe that we are on our own here on Earth to make it as good a place as we can.
Even though we label this abuse «sexual,» it is not merely sexual, since it includes other types of abuse such as emotional, psychological, and spiritual abuse as well.
I understand that every interaction you have with someone with a «Christian» label on themselves will shape your view of Christianity as a whole, but I would encourage you to keep in mind that the negative experiences often aren't representative of the whole, and that they will be much more memorable to you than perhaps dozens of interactions you have had with Christians who treated you well.
It's all rather simple, really... «spiritual but not religious» in its own labeling, gives its adherents permission to judge and divide people into groups — spiritual people — those are the good guys, and religious people — those are the bad guys.
What church christians don't understand is that their is no difference between them and the «world» in regards to a legalistic system that labels you «good» or «bad» according to your works (as well as the measurement of our value and usefulness for that matter).
The hard truth is that those of us who have borne the label «evangelical» have not always put our best foot — or our best gospel — forward.
The way we have previously labelled gods they really don't have to be all powerful, and knowing or all good.
To offer one example: I see no good reason that the label «evangelical» should not be applied to John Wesley, and I recently commissioned a book by a Wesleyan on Wesley on the Christian Life for a series I am co-editing.
Not just the spiritual nutrition label and the triple yin - yang — which I'd also thought of some time back — but there are so many other details, and descriptions which apply to me as well.
I am grateful that you're not like many I've encountered who are quick to label you unsaved if you don't hold to their interpretation but to boldly proclaim that we should deny the violent God who sends souls to hell seems very dangerous to me as well.
Yet it is good to be reminded that people are people, not the labels placed upon them.